What do you think about this 3-D movement?
Options
VIBE
Members Posts: 54,384 ✭✭✭✭✭
Movies, now on tv's soon to be on gaming systems not too long from now.
Do you think it's gonna ? tv? Has it killed the movies?
Do you think it's gonna ? tv? Has it killed the movies?
Comments
-
It hasnt killed anything.. i could careless about it.. ? gonna be walkin around in 3-D stunna shades soon.. people wont be able to see without them.. from watchin that ? so much... they are definitely gonna make a killing off of it but i wont be thirsting for this tech
-
it's already over done
-
As far as movies go, I think it depends on the movie. Certain movies are going to work really well in 3-D, Avatar was great in 3-D. Yet, I don't see a trend where there are more 3-D movies in theaters compared to traditional ones.
TV has another few years I think before people really want to check it out. -
thenatureboy wrote: »As far as movies go, I think it depends on the movie. Certain movies are going to work really well in 3-D, Avatar was great in 3-D. Yet, I don't see a trend where there are more 3-D movies in theaters compared to traditional ones.
TV has another few years I think before people really want to check it out.
Well, the 3-D tv has already started. Seen commercials on 'em. But wtf? 3-D glasses cost like $80 and up PER glasses. Many reviews came in and said that they give nice 3-D but aren't comfy at all.
This 3-D movie thing is over done, like, I can give a ? less about seeing a movie in 3-D that I gotta pay like what, 5-10$ extra for? Not worth it. I've enjoyed movies in regular format for the past like 20 years so why 3-D? Especially in gaming later on, that ? is going to fail.
As for tv, you know that Nickolodeon, Disney, Cartoon Network are gonna jump on that ? with special edition shows for the 3-D tv viewers. Kids love that 3-D effect. Then what? News in 3-D? Game shows in 3-D? Network shows in 3-D? wtf a 3-D tv for anyway? -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
I think they're over doing it now it was cool when they first brought it back out but now selling 3-D tv's and putting it on just about every other movie that comes out....smh it's gonna get played out soon
-
? hate 3d. its starting to get over done. its startin to ? moives. i dont think t.v will be hit as hard, i dont think ppl are gonna shell out the racks for a 3d t.v if there are even out yet.
-
Stating genuinely my perception regarding 3D, I would say that this 3D system would not ? the world. It is totally depending on the producers. It is not ethical that to increase the capital and fame the excess loss of technologies should be conducted. There is no need of every movie's conversion in to 3D. I believe that there is not necessary of advanced technology in all the field.
Actually the real graded disadvantage of the 3D screen savers is that the amount of system resources it requires. Well in a computer this 3D system can slow the whole system and also it other programme work at a reduced speed in comparison to normally. One other big disadvantage is the processor heats up too much which in turn decreases the life of the processor. -
If aint shot with that expensive ass camera that James Cameron got.... its a fail. Only one other movie I know to date that has used the same 3-d camera as Cameron and thats the new Resident Evil movie.
All these ? movies trying to do 3-D suck. Half of the time they take the shorcut and shoot the movie with a standard film camera then try to go and mak it 3-D in editing which does nothing but make the ? blurry, like the Clash of Titans. To me its wack cuz they just trying to get people to pay more for ? . If you're not going to take the time or money to shoot your movie right in 3-D then don't waste you time.
Oh and them 3-D TVs is just over the top and a reason to sell overpriced flat screens. I already wear glasses. So u want me to take off the glasses that help me actually see to put on a pair of glasses just to watch a ? episode of Greys Anantomy.....? YOU -
wants to watch Ireversible in 3d....
I pray you're just joking and aren't that sick in the head. -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
If aint shot with that expensive ass camera that James Cameron got.... its a fail. Only one other movie I know to date that has used the same 3-d camera as Cameron and thats the new Resident Evil movie.
All these ? movies trying to do 3-D suck. Half of the time they take the shorcut and shoot the movie with a standard film camera then try to go and mak it 3-D in editing which does nothing but make the ? blurry, like the Clash of Titans. To me its wack cuz they just trying to get people to pay more for ? . If you're not going to take the time or money to shoot your movie right in 3-D then don't waste you time.
Oh and them 3-D TVs is just over the top and a reason to sell overpriced flat screens. I already wear glasses. So u want me to take off the glasses that help me actually see to put on a pair of glasses just to watch a ? episode of Greys Anantomy.....? YOU
I wear glasses too, and most all of the reviews said that all pairs of 3-D glasses aren't user friendly to those that already wear glasses.(that you wear at home for your 3-D tv) -
Tron will be dope.
-
I wear glasses too, and most all of the reviews said that all pairs of 3-D glasses aren't user friendly to those that already wear glasses.(that you wear at home for your 3-D tv)
They should have some type of clip-on for people who wear glasses. -
It's being used to cover up ? movies and puts a break in between all the damn unwanted remakes being produced lately.
-
Ok... I’m not gonna lie, I wanna see upcoming “Piranha 3-D”! lol.
I’m in the minority though, because I don’t mind 3-D movies. I think they're fun
Especially when done properly.
They probably just use 3-D, so people actually go to the cinema & pay, avoid piracy -
Hilarious.If aint shot with that expensive ass camera that James Cameron got.... its a fail. Only one other movie I know to date that has used the same 3-d camera as Cameron and thats the new Resident Evil movie.
All these ? movies trying to do 3-D suck. Half of the time they take the shorcut and shoot the movie with a standard film camera then try to go and mak it 3-D in editing which does nothing but make the ? blurry, like the Clash of Titans. To me its wack cuz they just trying to get people to pay more for ? . If you're not going to take the time or money to shoot your movie right in 3-D then don't waste you time.
Oh and them 3-D TVs is just over the top and a reason to sell overpriced flat screens. I already wear glasses. So u want me to take off the glasses that help me actually see to put on a pair of glasses just to watch a ? episode of Greys Anantomy.....? YOU
I feel your pain. -
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/b26bfbf7cca7b014faa8ceaf4da7ed14.svg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89TLbK6o-og