Megan Fox not coming back for Transformers 3!!!!
Options
dat_bk_nicca
Members Posts: 1,526 ✭✭
Earlier this month, Megan Fox was spotted doing previz shots for Transformers 3, but now Variety is reporting that she will not appear as Mikaela in the third installment after all.
Paramount Pictures reportedly decided not to pick up her option as the studio and director Michael Bay want to take the story line in another direction and plan to cast another actress as the love interest for Sam Witwicky, played by Shia LaBeouf. The trade says the decision "was unrelated to a September interview with a British magazine in which Fox compared Bay with Adolf ? ."
The third installment is scheduled to hit theaters on July 1, 2011.
Paramount Pictures reportedly decided not to pick up her option as the studio and director Michael Bay want to take the story line in another direction and plan to cast another actress as the love interest for Sam Witwicky, played by Shia LaBeouf. The trade says the decision "was unrelated to a September interview with a British magazine in which Fox compared Bay with Adolf ? ."
The third installment is scheduled to hit theaters on July 1, 2011.
Comments
-
biggyboy_karl wrote: »Man, ? the love interests!
I wanna see some real autobot ? .
no robo.
c/s this ? gonna turn into spider-man 3 if they keep going with this love ? -
c/s this ? gonna turn into spider-man 3 if they keep going with this love ?
FACT^^^
although i liked Spiderman 3... -
They should ? off Sam too and just set the ? back on Cybertron
-
this ? is now on minute 13.....
-
FACT^^^
although i liked Spiderman 3...
nah that was the worst of the 3 if they woulda not had that ? ass dance scene and added that time to the venom fight scene then that woulda been ill -
hahaha. She might not have been fired b/c of her rant, but I'm betting it had something to do with them "going in a different direction."
Stupid ? . -
Lorenzo de Medici wrote: »hahaha. She might not have been fired b/c of her rant, but I'm betting it had something to do with them "going in a different direction."
Stupid ? .
Agreed. It was probably why they got rid of her. They just don't want to say it publicly.
I can just imagine the nerd rage that's going to result from this. Anyway, her career is pretty much shot now. I expect to see her doing softcore movies on Skinemax before too long. -
biggyboy_karl wrote: »Man, ? the love interests!
I wanna see some real autobot ? .
no robo.
yeah i gotta cosign this. ? **** sam his love interest or his life. the ? movie is called TRANSFOMERS. not SAM feat. the tranformers. -
-
darkone360 wrote: »13? ? that dropped to 9mins LOL!!
i was counting up, not down lol -
I remember going to see the 2nd Transformers movie and the cinemas on an X pill with my ex and I was wiggin out, geeked up in my seat, couldnt sit still, sweatin, wantin to get up and jog on the spot and ? and then Megan Fox came on the screen and the only thing I could do was stare at the screen, grab my ex on the ? and I was still as ? , I got lost in Megan Fox's eyes on that giant screen.....I was in love.
It'll suck without her but as long as she gets replaced by another hotty, I'm iite. -
m. inferno wrote: »this ? is now on minute 13.....
lol cosign you aint gonna see her getting them movie roles no more, then comes playboy -
nothin to do with her comments? Yea right....? should've kept her mouth shut and collected her check. Although I do agree with the comments she and Shia made about the movie (he just was smart enough to word his comments better) I would have kept my mouth shut till we finished up all the movies and had my checks in hand for I said ANYTHING.
-
Until Michael Bay walks away from the franchise, I wont care. ? him and his ADD movie makin ass.
-
why is there a transformers 3 when the 2nd one was weak
-
detcatinva wrote: »why is there a transformers 3 when the 2nd one was weak
Cuz the ? still rakes in over $700mil no matter how wack it is thats why.
Transformers: $709.7mil worldwide
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen: $836,297,228 worldwide
Think about it... Avatar took like $300mil or more to make. I'm pretty sure Transformers didn't cost that nearly as much to make. I would keep making them ? too if thats gone be my profit margin EVER ? time. And thats not even recouped money like James Cameron cuz JC came out his own pocket for Avatar. Micheal Bay had studio backing and didn't come out of pocket so he don't see nothing but profit. Only difference its that JC was just trying to one up himself cuz he wanted to have the top 2 biggest box office movies of all time. -
http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/05/19/let-the-transformers-3-recasting-rumors-begin-gemma-arterton-may-be-new-love-interest/
i hope they use this chick shes hot she was in casino royale, clash of the titans and shes in pricnce of persia -
FACT^^^
although i liked Spiderman 3...
I'd be honest and say I liked Spiderman 3, knowing they messed up the storyline!
What killed it for me is the fact that they just quit, they're not doing Spiderman 4 and at least finishing the job.
Because they left Spiderman 3 as a cliffhanger and now they don't finish it, thats ? ass!! -
-
Well, the movie industry is not getting my $10...unless they replace Megan Fox with Ashley Greene...then we can talk.
-
swag_of_krypton wrote: »Well, the movie industry is not getting my $10...unless they replace Megan Fox with Ashley Greene...then we can talk.
Bruh that can go down!! -
I'd be honest and say I liked Spiderman 3, knowing they messed up the storyline!
What killed it for me is the fact that they just quit, they're not doing Spiderman 4 and at least finishing the job.
Because they left Spiderman 3 as a cliffhanger and now they don't finish it, thats ? ass!!
Well, to be fair, that was the studio's decision to do that. Sam Raimi was all set for "Spider-Man 4", and Tobey Maguire had just been re-signed. Sony pulled the rug out from under them and decided to re-boot the franchise.
