IC Reaction Ratios: Indicitive Of A Donkey Poster's Quality?
Options
p-tavern
Members Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭✭✭
By "reaction ratios," I mean the total number of negative reactions in contrast to the total number of positives.
Are people with far more WFN points very ? posters, or are they victims of the wrath of "haters?"
Are the posters with a greater number of CEG buttons of a higher quality, or just the benefactors of "dickriding?"
I've done a little numbers crunching and they seem to be on point imo for about 80% posters, but I'm still looking...
Thoughts?
Are people with far more WFN points very ? posters, or are they victims of the wrath of "haters?"
Are the posters with a greater number of CEG buttons of a higher quality, or just the benefactors of "dickriding?"
I've done a little numbers crunching and they seem to be on point imo for about 80% posters, but I'm still looking...
Thoughts?
Comments
-
Too early to tell. I say eventually yes. Right now its just too new and trendy to get a serious baseline.
-
haters bro!
-
23
Wack
12
Feelings
22
Nosign
38
Cosign
1
Ether
5
GOAT
1
Spam
0
Abuse
15
Troll -
82
Wack
24
Feelings
68
Nosign
131
Cosign
18
Ether
30
GOAT
2
Spam
7
Abuse
7
Troll -
for most people (like me) it is.....anybody/everybody is gonna have some wfn's tho....i got a low post count average period so my numbers pretty much match that
-
13 Wack 27 Feelings 15 Nosign 32 Cosign 17 Ether 5 GOAT 0 Spam 0 Abuse 2 Troll
my numbers are still low, but im not posting a large amount. btw I gave ptavern a feelings vote for this thread -
18 Wack
2 Feelings
14 Nosign
54 Cosign
15 Ether
8 GOAT
1 Spam
1 Abuse
0 Troll -
10 Wack
1 Feelings
7 Nosign
29 Cosign
8 Ether
1 GOAT
0 Spam
0 Abuse
1 Troll
I keeps it real. -
folks should be able to see who gave them what reactions
-
Agreed lolMs Southern wrote: »folks should be able to see who gave them what reactions
that would make things interesting
-
21 Wack 17 Feelings 28 Nosign 104 Cosign 12 Ether 5 GOAT 0 Spam 0 Abuse 5 Troll
-
making it anonymous makes more people use it I think. Half these fools wouldn't have the sack to say ? publicly.
-
-
Ratings mean not a ? thing, specially when u got them haters mane.
Prime example would be to look at Pico's (a lame) and my ratings ( a boss).. she can type "Ha", so can I, but she will get a goat rating, while I get a wack. Simple.
Very few ratings are accurate as far as having an indication as to the quality of the poster.
U knew from jump it wouldnt favor me, or say a TB.. too much haters bro. -
Who gives a ? about any of this stuff?
-
Elzo69Reloaded wrote: »Who gives a ? about any of this stuff?
-
they should give everyone a certain amount of reactions a month ....
the more points u earn the more reactions u earn ....
stop all the unnecesary reactions from folks who *coughs* seek the attention of others via keyboards .... -
Lol at giving me a feelings caught
-
i think if you post any opinions in reason you gotta be prepared to ruffle some feathers. those kids are incredibly emotional.
-
Tommy Bilfiger. wrote: »52 Wack 38 Feelings 65 Nosign 62 Cosign 6 Ether 5 GOAT 0 Spam 6 Abuse 205 Troll
I think its more indicative of how mad u make these emotional people
lol @ this post getting flagged. Yeah I would imagine the posters that evoke the most reactions would get the worst ratings. -
Why are Riddles post transparent? :-/
-
? really hate the kid. i still have yet to use a single reaction.
-
Why did they bury riddle's first post; because he got 5 'wacks' nh? I gave it a GOAT in hopes of resurrecting him like JesusKKKrist.
-
its weird cause my 2nd post has 5 wacks (last time i checked) and isnt buried. idk how that works.
-
yeah its lame
![[Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4d5f18e60a0c14866b074c72ec2ab49d.svg)
