Discovered on a faded scrap of papyrus, the words "Jesus said to them, 'My wife …'"
Options
FucktheIC
Members Posts: 1,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/us/historian-says-piece-of-papyrus-refers-to-jesus-wife.html?_r=1
Damn. Dan Brown was right, afterall.
Damn. Dan Brown was right, afterall.
Comments
-
So jesus was ? ??!? Catholic church lauce...
-
Jesus smashed the homie.
-
Perhaps this will put the rest the suspicions that Yehoshuah was a ? .
It won't. -
400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...
about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?
*waits for christians to come and ? on this*
-
Pico Roscoe wrote: »So jesus was ? ??!? Catholic church lauce...
why?
why would this diminish his 'message'? -
yaaaaaawwwn. the gnostic church been on that.
#Sa7ut3 -
I won't diminish it, I was refering to the fact they won't let women or married men hold preisthood cause they arn't "jesus like"Louis Cipher wrote: »Louis Cipher wrote: »Pico Roscoe wrote: »So jesus was ? ??!? Catholic church lauce...
why?
why would this diminish his 'message'? -
Pico Roscoe wrote: »Pico Roscoe wrote: »
I won't diminish it, I was refering to the fact they won't let women or married men hold preisthood cause they arn't "jesus like"Louis Cipher wrote: »Louis Cipher wrote: »Pico Roscoe wrote: »So jesus was ? ??!? Catholic church lauce...
why?
why would this diminish his 'message'?
ahhh
'sees your point' -
Word, priests out chea ? little boys and ? , when they could be getting ? like the "messiah".
-
YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?
... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE -
DROSODAMFUNNY wrote: »YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?
... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE
ever heard of symbolism?
this is an example why people shouldnt take every word in the bible literally.... -
DROSODAMFUNNY wrote: »YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?
... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE
um...........yeah
i think thats the point non-believers try to get across -
Already Home_17 wrote: »DROSODAMFUNNY wrote: »YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?
... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE
um...........yeah
i think thats the point non-believers try to get across
my point is...that the bible doesnt necessarily have to be a lie...just a guide...its the people who take it literally that would have a problem with this...
of course people do pick and choose what it is they choose to follow tho...but thats another thread -
Louis Cipher wrote: »Already Home_17 wrote: »DROSODAMFUNNY wrote: »YALL DO KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST RIGHT?
... IT WOULD LITERALLY, PHYSICALLY, AND SPIRITUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR JESUS TO BE HAVING SEX.. IF HE WAS, THE WHOLE BIBLE, CHRISTIANANITY, ECT WOULD BE A LIE
um...........yeah
i think thats the point non-believers try to get across
my point is...that the bible doesnt necessarily have to be a lie...just a guide...its the people who take it literally that would have a problem with this...
of course people do pick and choose what it is they choose to follow tho...but thats another thread
That's exactly what my professor said in a religion class I took. The Bible is a guide and it made sense in that respect. -
Louis Cipher wrote: »400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...
about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?
*waits for christians to come and ? on this*
It was from the 4th century so probably closer to 300 years after Jesus died. That's not that big a deal considering the accepted Gospels were written around 200 years after Jesus died.
I don't think this find is all that significant really. There are a bunch of books that say things about Jesus that aren't widely accepted. This article references the Gospel of Mary Magdalene and I'm pretty sure that book suggests that Mary was either his wife or close to it. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »Louis Cipher wrote: »400 yrs after Jesus dies...this was written...
about as valid as the rest of the bible...who knows?
*waits for christians to come and ? on this*
It was from the 4th century so probably closer to 300 years after Jesus died. That's not that big a deal considering the accepted Gospels were written around 200 years after Jesus died.
I don't think this find is all that significant really. There are a bunch of books that say things about Jesus that aren't widely accepted. This article references the Gospel of Mary Magdalene and I'm pretty sure that book suggests that Mary was either his wife or close to it.
none if its a big deal...because people that believe the bible will continue to believe...no matter what evidence is found...
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Temptation gets THE BEST of us it seems.
-
In that culture a man was supposed to be married far past Jesus' age. That and he was a rabbi right? I think they were required to be married before they could be rabbis anyway.
And what grown ass man who achieves that level of popularity (and in Jesus' case infamy) is going to die a 33 year old ? ? U dont get that popular without all the Canaanite & Hebrew Hoes trying to twerketh thine ? unto thee. -
Fan fiction is old as ? , so who knows.
-
-
The working theory is that this goes back to "The disciple whom Jesus loved.".In that culture a man was supposed to be married far past Jesus' age. That and he was a rabbi right? I think they were required to be married before they could be rabbis anyway.
And what grown ass man who achieves that level of popularity (and in Jesus' case infamy) is going to die a 33 year old ? ? U dont get that popular without all the Canaanite & Hebrew Hoes trying to twerketh thine ? unto thee. -
Jesus was the only person in history before mexicans to be named Jesus?
-
Nah, crakkkas didn't like calling him "Yehoshuah" or whatever-the-? his "actual"/fictional name was.The_Maryvale_Joker wrote: »Jesus was the only person in history before mexicans to be named Jesus?
So they anglicized the ? out of it. -
it was written many things will be said about Christ after his death to disapprove the truth. its all about what we choose to believe. His Father believed that man should marry woman in holy matrimony so im sure he considered it while he was alive but Jesus was no ordinary man. He came to earth to take care of His Fathers business not to get married to a woman, at least thats my point of view until real actual evidence proves me wrong
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
