Judge Orders NBA BALLER Stephan Marbury . . . To Pay His Jumpoff $200K
Options
ImTheKangRoundHere
Members Posts: 4,649 ✭✭✭✭✭
In what has to be one of the STRANGEST cases we've ever heard, an arbitrator has ordered former NBA player Stephon Marbury $930K . . . for firing her after she freaked him off 5 times.
Here is how the NY Post is reporting it:
[Stephan Marbury] hired Mitchell as a “private chef” in January 2006, the same month the team and coach Isiah Thomas were hit with a $10 million sexual-harassment suit by one of their executives, Anucha Browne Sanders.
Mitchell was soon serving up more than hot meals to her boss, the papers say.
“Starbury” fired her in 2006, and Mitchell complained that she’d been the victim of sexual harassment.
Marbury said he had considered their relationship “consensual” — but offered her $900,000 to keep her mouth shut.
Marbury, however, stopped making the payments in January 2010 after he’d already shelled out about $600,000 and, at Mitchell’s request, the case went to an arbitrator.
“It is uncontroverted that during Ms. Mitchell’s employment, she had a sexual relationship with Stephon Marbury which she described as occurring on approximately five occasions,” the arbitrator found.
Mitchell said the star “made her believe that ‘keeping him happy’ was a requirement of keeping her job,” the ruling said.
The other requirement was cooking for his wife, Latasha, and their three kids.
The arbitrator awarded Mitchell $330,000, saying she could have sued Marbury or sold her story for more money than she received, and that Marbury had his eyes open when he made the deal.
So all in the chick got $930K for FIVE freak offs. These HEAUX nowadays is WINNING!!!
Here is how the NY Post is reporting it:
[Stephan Marbury] hired Mitchell as a “private chef” in January 2006, the same month the team and coach Isiah Thomas were hit with a $10 million sexual-harassment suit by one of their executives, Anucha Browne Sanders.
Mitchell was soon serving up more than hot meals to her boss, the papers say.
“Starbury” fired her in 2006, and Mitchell complained that she’d been the victim of sexual harassment.
Marbury said he had considered their relationship “consensual” — but offered her $900,000 to keep her mouth shut.
Marbury, however, stopped making the payments in January 2010 after he’d already shelled out about $600,000 and, at Mitchell’s request, the case went to an arbitrator.
“It is uncontroverted that during Ms. Mitchell’s employment, she had a sexual relationship with Stephon Marbury which she described as occurring on approximately five occasions,” the arbitrator found.
Mitchell said the star “made her believe that ‘keeping him happy’ was a requirement of keeping her job,” the ruling said.
The other requirement was cooking for his wife, Latasha, and their three kids.
The arbitrator awarded Mitchell $330,000, saying she could have sued Marbury or sold her story for more money than she received, and that Marbury had his eyes open when he made the deal.
So all in the chick got $930K for FIVE freak offs. These HEAUX nowadays is WINNING!!!
Comments
-
-
Smh, damn.
-
The arbitrator awarded Mitchell $330,000, saying she could have sued Marbury or sold her story for more money than she received, and that Marbury had his eyes open when he made the deal.
now thats some crazy ? -
? slipping these days
-
awhole lot of vaseline
-
what she look like?
-
Damn....that ? got 900,000....hoes winning
-
Lol @ this gossip. Close this ? .
-
His wifey looks good tooo...lol @ ? your personal chef....what if she did some steve mcnair ? and poisoned his wife and kids out of spite -
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
-
alot of Starberrys to sell
-
Black_Samson wrote: »time to start holding these judges physically accountable for these ? judgements.
let these fools start catching hot ones and i bet they'll be more down to earth.
Huh?? She got awarded exactly what Starbury agreed to pay her in the first place, nothing extra. Whats the problem? -
I would've told the judge ? no she's hoe I aint giving her ? .....left it at that
-
Black_Samson wrote: »time to start holding these judges physically accountable for these ? judgements.
let these fools start catching hot ones and i bet they'll be more down to earth.
Please tell that's not you in your sig? -
hoes getting paid now gotta be careful
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
the ? ??
-
-
I'm sure he got a lot more LS coming I know he rammin them chinks
-
This ? STAYS losing.
-
"? don't think ..? don't ..? don't think " -Ab Soul
-
numbaz...80's baby wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »time to start holding these judges physically accountable for these ? judgements.
let these fools start catching hot ones and i bet they'll be more down to earth.
Huh?? She got awarded exactly what Starbury agreed to pay her in the first place, nothing extra. Whats the problem?
Besides the fact that she received anything more than jail time for admitting to be a prostitute?
No problem with it at all. Judicial system condoning prostitution now & I cant smoke my got dam weed?
yea its feelings all thru my post. Mark up my feelings.
Uh no...Starbury agreed to a sexual harassment settlement of $900K...if he was dumb enough to do that, hows this on anybody but him? He let the ? LEGALLY trick off him. -
it pays to play