Happy Born Day Cancers!
Options
Comments
-
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ? ITS COMMING SOON!!!!
-
-
DA_Executionah! wrote: »
-
-
CRAB GANG !!!!!!!
-
-
Crab Gang lifestyle ain't for everyone
July 7th in this ? -
July 9th in the building
#JulyDoesItBetter -
June 29th in this bih!!!
-
My birthday coming soon, I'm dripping with anticipation.
-
Hoe ass ?
-
Wazzam Fellow Water Signs,
Pisces Checcin In lol -
-
JonnyRoccIT wrote: »Wazzam Fellow Water Signs,
Pisces Checcin In lol
FOH
[IMG]http://i1067.photobucket.com/albums/u423/jamaicaqueens22/? -Iron-man-vs.-Thor-GIF_zps8ng7y9a5.gif[/IMG] -
Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity.[6]:85;[11] Where it has made falsifiable predictions under controlled conditions, they have been falsified.[11]
One famous experiment included 28 astrologers who were asked to match over a hundred natal charts to psychological profiles generated by the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) questionnaire.[125][126] The double-blind experimental protocol used in this study was agreed upon by a group of physicists and a group of astrologers[11] nominated by the National Council for Geocosmic Research, who advised the experimenters, helped ensure that the test was fair[10]:420;[126]:117 and helped draw the central proposition of natal astrology to be tested.[10]:419 They also chose 26 out of the 28 astrologers for the tests (two more volunteered afterwards).[10]:420 The study, published in Nature in 1985, found that predictions based on natal astrology were no better than chance, and that the testing "...clearly refutes the astrological hypothesis."
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity.[6]:85;[11] Where it has made falsifiable predictions under controlled conditions, they have been falsified.[11]
One famous experiment included 28 astrologers who were asked to match over a hundred natal charts to psychological profiles generated by the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) questionnaire.[125][126] The double-blind experimental protocol used in this study was agreed upon by a group of physicists and a group of astrologers[11] nominated by the National Council for Geocosmic Research, who advised the experimenters, helped ensure that the test was fair[10]:420;[126]:117 and helped draw the central proposition of natal astrology to be tested.[10]:419 They also chose 26 out of the 28 astrologers for the tests (two more volunteered afterwards).[10]:420 The study, published in Nature in 1985, found that predictions based on natal astrology were no better than chance, and that the testing "...clearly refutes the astrological hypothesis."
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity.[6]:85;[11] Where it has made falsifiable predictions under controlled conditions, they have been falsified.[11]
One famous experiment included 28 astrologers who were asked to match over a hundred natal charts to psychological profiles generated by the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) questionnaire.[125][126] The double-blind experimental protocol used in this study was agreed upon by a group of physicists and a group of astrologers[11] nominated by the National Council for Geocosmic Research, who advised the experimenters, helped ensure that the test was fair[10]:420;[126]:117 and helped draw the central proposition of natal astrology to be tested.[10]:419 They also chose 26 out of the 28 astrologers for the tests (two more volunteered afterwards).[10]:420 The study, published in Nature in 1985, found that predictions based on natal astrology were no better than chance, and that the testing "...clearly refutes the astrological hypothesis."
Get out -
Y'all are a cancer to society foh
Two years later and still no cure for this disease... -
-
-
Cancers strongest zodiac sign
-
Birthday bash tonight!!!
-
Birthday bash tonight!!!
What strip club you be at Pico?
I'll bring the duffle bag
-
-