George Zimmerman juror: Trial ruined my life.. She says she lost friends & a full-time job...
Options
Comments
-
can'tyoutell wrote: »Raging Raven wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »I would hate to be a juror in a high profile case like that.
I'm too emotional and they're required to go by the law, which is ? in itself, especially in Florida.
imo that whole trial was up to interpretation... zimmerman didn't even follow directions and he did say " they always get away"
btw we gotta remember trayvon was a super strong super high " super thug" with 8 arms
You don't think the prosecution put the jury in a position where their hands were basically tied?
The only thing she really could have done is held out for a hung jury.
Hung jury would have been better than letting an obviously guilty person walk free and clear. His ass would have been on pins and needles until the next episode.
Retrial, ya bish.
Maybe she should have done that, but none of us know how we'd react in that situation until we've actually experienced it.
It's one thing to be pressured, but it's another to be pressured with the backing of the law.
I'm sure they worked her over, and I don't think she deserves to ostracized any more then what's been done.
Focus on the REAL problem..which was George Zimmerman and wack ass state laws.
Uhhh.....
I am very much aware of how I would have reacted if I were put into that situation.
An unarmed teenager that presented no obvious suspect behavior, is confronted, forced to defend himself, and then murdered.
Just as Zimmerman claimed the right to stand his ground, Trayvon had the same equal right to do so as well. Zimmerman was fully aware of the fact that he had a gun, and consciously made the decision to confront him. He (Zimmerman) put himself in that position, acting totally in line with his ? nature, and need for control.
Naaahhhhh. Race aside, he would be guilty in my book.
There was more evidence saying Zimmerman was in greater danger than Trayvon than the adverse.
Danger that could have been averted of Zimmerman did not put himself in a precarious position.
The fact is, Zimmerman went looking for a fight, knowing full well that he had a loaded weapon. He did not anticipate Trayvon standing his ground, thus committing a cowardly act. How much of a danger was it, when he went headfirst into the fire?
Can you prove he went looking for a fight? His story is he believed the kid might be up to no good and he was protecting his neighborhood.
Following trayvon and asking him questions was not an infraction of the law.
You really should not be speaking if you don't know the facts.The operator told him not to follow.He later changed his story and.claimed he never followed him.I don't know about you but if a stranger follows me we have a problem.He can say he whatever but he could be lying.He.could have been a child.abductor.
The operator has zero authority. Their words are meaningless. If it was a cop then there could be a claim of obstruction and he would be wrong.
The operator is just a person you do not have any legal obligation to do what they say. Disregarding what they say is not a crime.
Sometimes the operator is a police officer. But that's beside the point.
I didn't know that. Do they still have the same authority in that case or does the law treat them as off duty / civilians "?
I'm not sure. But I jumped the gun. This is more an exception, not the rule. But it is always wise to ask instead of assume if you're going to disregard everything they say.
-
Raging Raven wrote: »Raging Raven wrote: »Tracing dead but her life is ruined.
Trayvon ? auto correct.
To be fair, at one point he was a tracing. -
Raging Raven wrote: »Raging Raven wrote: »Tracing dead but her life is ruined.
Trayvon ? auto correct.
To be fair, at one point he was a tracing.
-
She is reaping hard what she has sawn imo
-
can'tyoutell wrote: »can'tyoutell wrote: »Raging Raven wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »I would hate to be a juror in a high profile case like that.
I'm too emotional and they're required to go by the law, which is ? in itself, especially in Florida.
imo that whole trial was up to interpretation... zimmerman didn't even follow directions and he did say " they always get away"
btw we gotta remember trayvon was a super strong super high " super thug" with 8 arms
You don't think the prosecution put the jury in a position where their hands were basically tied?
The only thing she really could have done is held out for a hung jury.
Hung jury would have been better than letting an obviously guilty person walk free and clear. His ass would have been on pins and needles until the next episode.
Retrial, ya bish.
Maybe she should have done that, but none of us know how we'd react in that situation until we've actually experienced it.
It's one thing to be pressured, but it's another to be pressured with the backing of the law.
I'm sure they worked her over, and I don't think she deserves to ostracized any more then what's been done.
Focus on the REAL problem..which was George Zimmerman and wack ass state laws.
Uhhh.....
I am very much aware of how I would have reacted if I were put into that situation.
An unarmed teenager that presented no obvious suspect behavior, is confronted, forced to defend himself, and then murdered.
Just as Zimmerman claimed the right to stand his ground, Trayvon had the same equal right to do so as well. Zimmerman was fully aware of the fact that he had a gun, and consciously made the decision to confront him. He (Zimmerman) put himself in that position, acting totally in line with his ? nature, and need for control.
Naaahhhhh. Race aside, he would be guilty in my book.
There was more evidence saying Zimmerman was in greater danger than Trayvon than the adverse.
Danger that could have been averted of Zimmerman did not put himself in a precarious position.
The fact is, Zimmerman went looking for a fight, knowing full well that he had a loaded weapon. He did not anticipate Trayvon standing his ground, thus committing a cowardly act. How much of a danger was it, when he went headfirst into the fire?
Can you prove he went looking for a fight? His story is he believed the kid might be up to no good and he was protecting his neighborhood.
Following trayvon and asking him questions was not an infraction of the law.
You really should not be speaking if you don't know the facts.The operator told him not to follow.He later changed his story and.claimed he never followed him.I don't know about you but if a stranger follows me we have a problem.He can say he whatever but he could be lying.He.could have been a child.abductor.
The operator has zero authority. Their words are meaningless. If it was a cop then there could be a claim of obstruction and he would be wrong.
The operator is just a person you do not have any legal obligation to do what they say. Disregarding what they say is not a crime.
Sometimes the operator is a police officer. But that's beside the point.
I didn't know that. Do they still have the same authority in that case or does the law treat them as off duty / civilians "?
I'm not sure. But I jumped the gun. This is more an exception, not the rule. But it is always wise to ask instead of assume if you're going to disregard everything they say.
Actually, disregard this. I think the dispatcher should identify themselves as a police officer before giving orders. Meh, this is not my angle in this argument. -
There weren't any black jurors in that trail.. I specifically remember that. -
She should have suffered in silence and kept her mouth shut about the case.
-
She don't deserve this. Why aren't ppl threataning the other ? on the jury?
Notice all you black folk wanna attack the one colored chick -
Jury duty is terrible
I missed a day of work so they could send me a check for $15
Never again -
Jury duty is terrible
I missed a day of work so they could send me a check for $15
Never again
lol $5 dollars here in my state..Though Rare Some jobs don't pay for Jury Duty. -
You're looking right at her, but you specifically remember that?
-
Do porn now. What those holes lookin like?
-
this is wonderful news
-
No pity for that ? .
No law is going to get me to vote not guilty for some ? racist coward like fat boy.
I hope somebody makes good on their death threats so we could stop hearing about her punk ass. -
Tough break ?
-
SiccoLoccJay wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »I would hate to be a juror in a high profile case like that.
I'm too emotional and they're required to go by the law, which is ? in itself, especially in Florida.
imo that whole trial was up to interpretation... zimmerman didn't even follow directions and he did say " they always get away"
btw we gotta remember trayvon was a super strong super high " super thug" with 8 arms
You don't think the prosecution put the jury in a position where their hands were basically tied?
The only thing she really could have done is held out for a hung jury.
Hung jury would have been better than letting an obviously guilty person walk free and clear. His ass would have been on pins and needles until the next episode.
Retrial, ya bish.
Maybe she should have done that, but none of us know how we'd react in that situation until we've actually experienced it.
It's one thing to be pressured, but it's another to be pressured with the backing of the law.
I'm sure they worked her over, and I don't think she deserves to ostracized any more then what's been done.
Focus on the REAL problem..which was George Zimmerman and wack ass state laws.
If you black and get pressured the 1st thing you do is ? and ask for a lawyer loldamobb2deep wrote: »Stopitfive wrote: »
The law states that he must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The absence of evidence meant that the altercation between Zimmerman and Trayvon preceding the shooting was a mystery.
The woman who was speaking with Trayvon on the phone alleged that Trayvon hit Zimmerman first. Zimmerman said that Trayvon hit him first. Two witnesses allege that Zimmerman was getting his ass handed to him.
His self defense argument could not be refuted beyond a reasonable doubt to the jurors. How did you interpret the laws which would result in a different verdict?
ol girl aint say trayvon hit zimmerman 1st.. she said she heard zimmerman talkin 2 trayvon .. the phone dropping and them fighting in wet grass..
"I believe Trayvon hit first"
Imma wack you just cause u find it ok a kid got killed fck the being black part u don't kll kids bru
I gave you feelings because I never said I think killing kids is justifiable. I am saying the law is flawed and Zimmerman acted legally according to that faulty set of laws.
I'm gonna just start wacking your post
cause your defending a kid killer bru. Dc if I catch a feelins cause I do feel a certain type of way abt the situation. Cause ur defending a guilty man fck you and wat u think point blank period if u wad in my neighborhood I'd trayvon ya ass and see if the law lets me off. -
shouldnt have caved in then, ?
-
so now she isnt considered Black? Now she's a Hispanic/Puerto Rican?
-
SiccoLoccJay wrote: »SiccoLoccJay wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »I would hate to be a juror in a high profile case like that.
I'm too emotional and they're required to go by the law, which is ? in itself, especially in Florida.
imo that whole trial was up to interpretation... zimmerman didn't even follow directions and he did say " they always get away"
btw we gotta remember trayvon was a super strong super high " super thug" with 8 arms
You don't think the prosecution put the jury in a position where their hands were basically tied?
The only thing she really could have done is held out for a hung jury.
Hung jury would have been better than letting an obviously guilty person walk free and clear. His ass would have been on pins and needles until the next episode.
Retrial, ya bish.
Maybe she should have done that, but none of us know how we'd react in that situation until we've actually experienced it.
It's one thing to be pressured, but it's another to be pressured with the backing of the law.
I'm sure they worked her over, and I don't think she deserves to ostracized any more then what's been done.
Focus on the REAL problem..which was George Zimmerman and wack ass state laws.
If you black and get pressured the 1st thing you do is ? and ask for a lawyer loldamobb2deep wrote: »Stopitfive wrote: »
The law states that he must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The absence of evidence meant that the altercation between Zimmerman and Trayvon preceding the shooting was a mystery.
The woman who was speaking with Trayvon on the phone alleged that Trayvon hit Zimmerman first. Zimmerman said that Trayvon hit him first. Two witnesses allege that Zimmerman was getting his ass handed to him.
His self defense argument could not be refuted beyond a reasonable doubt to the jurors. How did you interpret the laws which would result in a different verdict?
ol girl aint say trayvon hit zimmerman 1st.. she said she heard zimmerman talkin 2 trayvon .. the phone dropping and them fighting in wet grass..
"I believe Trayvon hit first"
Imma wack you just cause u find it ok a kid got killed fck the being black part u don't kll kids bru
I gave you feelings because I never said I think killing kids is justifiable. I am saying the law is flawed and Zimmerman acted legally according to that faulty set of laws.
I'm gonna just start wacking your post
cause your defending a kid killer bru. Dc if I catch a feelins cause I do feel a certain type of way abt the situation. Cause ur defending a guilty man fck you and wat u think point blank period if u wad in my neighborhood I'd trayvon ya ass and see if the law lets me off.
I don't thik he's defending a kid killer I just think he's very objective about ? , even when it's ? annoying. -
SiccoLoccJay wrote: »SiccoLoccJay wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »I would hate to be a juror in a high profile case like that.
I'm too emotional and they're required to go by the law, which is ? in itself, especially in Florida.
imo that whole trial was up to interpretation... zimmerman didn't even follow directions and he did say " they always get away"
btw we gotta remember trayvon was a super strong super high " super thug" with 8 arms
You don't think the prosecution put the jury in a position where their hands were basically tied?
The only thing she really could have done is held out for a hung jury.
Hung jury would have been better than letting an obviously guilty person walk free and clear. His ass would have been on pins and needles until the next episode.
Retrial, ya bish.
Maybe she should have done that, but none of us know how we'd react in that situation until we've actually experienced it.
It's one thing to be pressured, but it's another to be pressured with the backing of the law.
I'm sure they worked her over, and I don't think she deserves to ostracized any more then what's been done.
Focus on the REAL problem..which was George Zimmerman and wack ass state laws.
If you black and get pressured the 1st thing you do is ? and ask for a lawyer loldamobb2deep wrote: »Stopitfive wrote: »
The law states that he must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The absence of evidence meant that the altercation between Zimmerman and Trayvon preceding the shooting was a mystery.
The woman who was speaking with Trayvon on the phone alleged that Trayvon hit Zimmerman first. Zimmerman said that Trayvon hit him first. Two witnesses allege that Zimmerman was getting his ass handed to him.
His self defense argument could not be refuted beyond a reasonable doubt to the jurors. How did you interpret the laws which would result in a different verdict?
ol girl aint say trayvon hit zimmerman 1st.. she said she heard zimmerman talkin 2 trayvon .. the phone dropping and them fighting in wet grass..
"I believe Trayvon hit first"
Imma wack you just cause u find it ok a kid got killed fck the being black part u don't kll kids bru
I gave you feelings because I never said I think killing kids is justifiable. I am saying the law is flawed and Zimmerman acted legally according to that faulty set of laws.
I'm gonna just start wacking your post
cause your defending a kid killer bru. Dc if I catch a feelins cause I do feel a certain type of way abt the situation. Cause ur defending a guilty man fck you and wat u think point blank period if u wad in my neighborhood I'd trayvon ya ass and see if the law lets me off.
They wouldn't cause I am lighter skinned than you.
This case is funny. People go into their feelings quickly and wanna throw guilty charges around without looking at the laws in place. -
Gotdayum. The feelings in this ? are still strong.
She had the option of remaining anonymous though, so she brought this upon herself. -
That's what happens when you're fat.
-
Some ? really get on they troll ? whenever this topic comes up.
-
BlackGerald wrote: »She don't deserve this. Why aren't ppl threataning the other ? on the jury?
Notice all you black folk wanna attack the one colored chick
I'm sure the others would be treated and attacked just the same, this dumb ? willing put herself on blast for the entire world to see, nobody forced her into this bruh -
Lol @ her getting it far worse then Zimmerman after all that talk from ? about Zimmerman not being able to walk the streets.
and this is one thing i can and will never understand. i remember seeing fools wearing custom made shirts saying "? ass cracka" underneath zimmerman's face, posting pics of ak's and ar-15's on instagram with hashtags describing how he's a dead man. and making songs on youtube spewing ominous threats about how theyll hunt him down. yet through all of this, he somehow still manages to take pictures smiling with gun manufacturers and can threaten his wife by nailing bullet riddled targets on her wall out in the open. doing all of this while being virtually unscathed. comprehending how the ? 's feeble and incapacitated mind operates sometimes is something im not sure id ever be able to do
