Should the good people of the IC be involved in the appointing of new mods?
Options
Comments
-
-
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modLol At trapped in my ?
U niggaa is stupid -
@ThatDamnJay I think the IC should also get that "rep" system as other forums has.
That way you get credited for your posting and also a good way to see who is a good poster/wack/troll -
-
Busta Carmichael wrote: »@ThatDamnJay I think the IC should also get that "rep" system as other forums has.
That way you get credited for your posting and also a good way to see who is a good poster/wack/troll
I looked into it for this site, but couldn't find the option ("closest" thing to it is the stars deal that's been implemented, but it's not the same)...our next upgrade, we may be able to implement that kinda system from the beginning tho, so good looks
-
Nah I couldn't give a ? who is made a mod as long as they dont ban me
-
Black_Excellence wrote: »Could any of the already appointed mods give me a reason why Stringer Bell isn't one yet.
Bcuz posting links about black/white issues doesnt make someone a mod
? wanted a newsfeed as a mod? -
i think i should be a mod by now
-
Nah I couldn't give a ? who is made a mod as long as they dont ban meGazaHoodlum wrote: »i think i should be a mod by now
-
-
Has not being involved produced the desired outcomes?
-
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modTheHeroNoltey wrote: »Has not being involved produced the desired outcomes?OMEGA_CONFLICT wrote: »Oh look six is posting two ? kissing in the backstreets good job @thatdamnjay
From here on out ill be picking the mods
-
OMEGA_CONFLICT wrote: »Cuz alll of meee
Loves all of Du
Love his toilet and his edges
Add his pics to my collection
Yep. Still funny. -
there are many reasons that traffic on this site sucks... one of them is the choice of moderators...
look at what the latest appointee is doing... -
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a mod
he brought attention to it, claiming flags would never get him banned...
then he got banned.
? a matt -
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modThirdEyeFive wrote: »there are many reasons that traffic on this site sucks... one of them is the choice of moderators...
look at what the latest appointee is doing...
But ion know nothing -
ThirdEyeFive wrote: »there are many reasons that traffic on this site sucks... one of them is the choice of moderators...
look at what the latest appointee is doing...
? -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
ThirdEyeFive wrote: »there are many reasons that traffic on this site sucks... one of them is the choice of moderators...
look at what the latest appointee is doing...
You have to put things in context. Moderators are only going to reflect the quality of their leader. Bad admininistrators = ? moderating.
If a moderator feels they can post ? porn and alienate 95% of the community then that is a clear indication that the moderator was given the green light to do so. Which if you recall is not shocking because Jay has a history of allowing gayliases to spam ? porn on the board; even going so far as covering up the identities of said gayliases.
Recall that the forum downgrades and the major losses of traffic occurred during this same administration. Most importantly remember that the admin is a self professed former ? addict and cut him some slack.
-
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modBlack_Samson wrote: »
he brought attention to it, claiming flags would never get him banned...
then he got banned.
? a matt
Matt got banned cause you wouldnt stop @ing us with pics of his offensive post.
You snitched until we took notice.
i see u got ya Koon Klux ? Kape on tight as usual
post screenshots of me @ing u or any mod... dont deflect dont type nonsense.. post screenshots of me @ing u or shut yo tap dancing crackhead ass up -
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modearth two superman wrote: »OMEGA_CONFLICT wrote: »Cuz alll of meee
Loves all of Du
Love his toilet and his edges
Add his pics to my collection
Yep. Still funny.
Now I know fa sho yo ? ass edited my post. Oh what a surprise @dwo ? ass didn't say who done it. I bet if I @ciinTheHeroNoltey wrote: »ThirdEyeFive wrote: »there are many reasons that traffic on this site sucks... one of them is the choice of moderators...
look at what the latest appointee is doing...
You have to put things in context. Moderators are only going to reflect the quality of their leader. Bad admininistrators = ? moderating.
If a moderator feels they can post ? porn and alienate 95% of the community then that is a clear indication that the moderator was given the green light to do so. Which if you recall is not shocking because Jay has a history of allowing gayliases to spam ? porn on the board; even going so far as covering up the identities of said gayliases.
Recall that the forum downgrades and the major losses of traffic occurred during this same administration. Most importantly remember that the admin is a self professed former ? addict and cut him some slack.
Oh look its Matt -
he brought attention to it, claiming flags would never get him banned...
then he got banned.
? a matt
You think eventually you'll get me demodded? @trillfate?
Impossible. His criminal file is tooooo heavy imo -
Yes... we, the posters should have a say who is appointed as a modthe only mods on here that MOD WITHOUTFEELINGS ARE
@mrssouthern
@DWO
@Black_Samson (majority of the time)
@cain
@stew
the rest of the...they get in they feelings way to much for the job.....yes we need to start voting whenever theres a new spot open -
this bird is truly demented...