Smartest posters on the IC?
Options
Comments
-
Word, who graduated from an Ivy League School?
i drove by a few and worked in a couple -
-
I m not even gonna take the fact that I haven't been mentioned as disrespect .....
-
Intelligence cannot be readily measured..
Everybody is a genius in their own right whether you agree with them or not
Even my opposition on this board is extremely intelligent..
I'm not quick to label anyone smart or dumb because we all have areas to master in life..
And that "cub" you look down on may grow to be a ferocious lion one day
-
the guy @elzo is suppersmart.
he knows alot about a lot and hes cool people too.
him and sion are make the goat firm one day -
mryounggun wrote: »@BOSSExcellence and @Black_Samson too.
yeh...
i dont consider myself smart.. i aint sittin at home missin out on life burried in books..
but what i do have is wisdom.. and i cant take full credit for that cause alot of it was handed down to me and/or i learned thru others success and failures..
its like they say "common sense aint common" ..so i jus seem like a "know it all" lol -
@zzombie there's nothing wrong with weed bruh
you people misuse weed. You smoke too much of that ? and it dulls your brain -
Sion, Chuck, Zombie when he is speaking bout history stuff and not religious/republican/so and so is a heathen ? , Pico cause I wanna ? her and she surprises me when not trolling, Kai because she is smart and I want to ? her too, and a few others I don't remember right now.
-
-
There's a difference between intelligence and wisdom.
@Kai
@mryounggun
@BOSSExcellence
@Sion
@DWO
and believe it or not, my ? @Ajackson17 be on some other ? when he not on that other ? .
A lot of other ? I interact with too, there's a lot of intelligence here, that's why I ? wit it so tough. -
You can't adequately judge anonymous strangers' intelligence by their ability to convey themselves with no time limits on an internet forum. So every post in here is speculative and there's a great chance many of us would change our list if we all met one another and actually spent time discussing various subjects.
-
The Iconoclast wrote: »You can't adequately judge anonymous strangers' intelligence by their ability to convey themselves with no time limits on an internet forum. So every post in here is speculative and there's a great chance many of us would change our list if we all met one another and actually spent time discussing various subjects.
yeh.. i be at muthafuckas ..my response time be a minute if that.. but they take 10-15 mins to respond.. sometimes even longer.. a.mann is good for that ? ..
google geniuses. lol -
BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Iconoclast wrote: »You can't adequately judge anonymous strangers' intelligence by their ability to convey themselves with no time limits on an internet forum. So every post in here is speculative and there's a great chance many of us would change our list if we all met one another and actually spent time discussing various subjects.
yeh.. i be at muthafuckas ..my response time be a minute if that.. but they take 10-15 mins to respond.. sometimes even longer.. a.mann is good for that ? ..
google geniuses. lol
? be googling for answers? -
The Iconoclast wrote: »You can't adequately judge anonymous strangers' intelligence by their ability to convey themselves with no time limits on an internet forum. So every post in here is speculative and there's a great chance many of us would change our list if we all met one another and actually spent time discussing various subjects.
That's actually a great point.
-
Ajackson17 wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Iconoclast wrote: »You can't adequately judge anonymous strangers' intelligence by their ability to convey themselves with no time limits on an internet forum. So every post in here is speculative and there's a great chance many of us would change our list if we all met one another and actually spent time discussing various subjects.
yeh.. i be at muthafuckas ..my response time be a minute if that.. but they take 10-15 mins to respond.. sometimes even longer.. a.mann is good for that ? ..
google geniuses. lol
? be googling for answers?
not a.mann...
he jus aint as witty as he'd like to portray himself.. atleast quick witted..
but other ? ..
yeh.. they usin lifelines like a muthafucka. hahaha -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »
Did a year doing architecture switched to a degree in business management (this should let you know off the bat) specializing in technology, but I'm an idiot.
@_Jay_ is an erudite, since he's the admin -
-
Big ass coin
-
@Kai is smart.
I think boog is smart but he be bullshitting.
I think many people on the IC are wise in their own ways, completely clueless in other ways, and then some are just a lost cause.
Nobody is above learning from another, we all have something to offer. -
Well ? yall
-
There are a lot of smart people on here, until a topic where they are emotionally invested comes then most of them just say a bunch of dumb ? and pat each other on the back for it. That not withstanding you can get some good insight from a variety of people on here.
-
Too subjective for me, I wouldn't know.
-
Btw OP if I were to play your game of dissecting anonymous strangers' posts without time limits...
I'd ask you to give me a clear, universal standard to judge all posters by.
So if by smart you mean likely to have a high IQ, I'd view those who naturally excel and have an academic background in math and science as more likely to score higher than the general IC population. So for instance I wouldn't be surprised if posters like SixSickSins and Kai scored highest in that regard out of the female posters and someone like And_So_It_Burns fits that category on the male side but unlike the aforementioned females he isn't well known on this forum.
Nonetheless, perceived academic credentials isn't solely what I take into consideration because there's lots of idiots who've obtain degrees - I've associated with plenty of them irl.
One salient question that I consider from my perspective: If we were in a group setting offline would the level of discourse drop off considerably from what they've shown here?
Anyway there's about 20-25 people that stick out to me on this forum in terms of intelligence/mental capacity and I don't agree with some of them on most topics.
Although some in that group have been mentioned in this thread, many of them haven't been mentioned which hilarious due to some of the names that have been. Some are clearly confusing knowledge on a topic or the ability to convey common sense on the internet with intellect. Just as some people I know in irl erroneously believe academic accomplishments are synonymous with intellect or IQ.
Hell, I'm pretty sure a portion of the posters listed in this thread wouldn't even be able to form an opinion on or even process complex topics like string theory or post-structuralism even if you gave them a few hours to google it and post about it in a thread. Yet it's quite a few that haven't been mentioned (many are my favorite posters and posters who I don't really give a lot of reactions to but respect nonetheless) that likely could pull that off with little to no difficulty. -
The Iconoclast wrote: »Btw OP if I were to play your game of dissecting anonymous strangers' posts without time limits...
I'd ask you to give me a clear, universal standard to judge all posters by.
So if by smart you mean likely to have a high IQ, I'd view those who naturally excel and have an academic background in math and science as more likely to score higher than the general IC population. So for instance I wouldn't be surprised if posters like SixSickSins and Kai scored highest in that regard out of the female posters and someone like And_So_It_Burns fits that category on the male side but unlike the aforementioned females he isn't well known on this forum.
Nonetheless, perceived academic credentials isn't solely what I take into consideration because there's lots of idiots who've obtain degrees - I've associated with plenty of them irl.
One salient question that I consider from my perspective: If we were in a group setting offline would the level of discourse drop off considerably from what they've shown here?
Anyway there's about 20-25 people that stick out to me on this forum in terms of intelligence/mental capacity and I don't agree with some of them on most topics.
Although some in that group have been mentioned in this thread, many of them haven't been mentioned which hilarious due to some of the names that have been. Some are clearly confusing knowledge on a topic or the ability to convey common sense on the internet with intellect. Just as some people I know in irl erroneously believe academic accomplishments are synonymous with intellect or IQ.
Hell, I'm pretty sure a portion of the posters listed in this thread wouldn't even be able to form an opinion on or even process complex topics like string theory or post-structuralism even if you gave them a few hours to google it and post about it in a thread. Yet it's quite a few that haven't been mentioned (many are my favorite posters and posters who I don't really give a lot of reactions to but respect nonetheless) that likely could pull that off with little to no difficulty.
Blah blah bloo bloop -
The Iconoclast wrote: »Btw OP if I were to play your game of dissecting anonymous strangers' posts without time limits...
I'd ask you to give me a clear, universal standard to judge all posters by.
So if by smart you mean likely to have a high IQ, I'd view those who naturally excel and have an academic background in math and science as more likely to score higher than the general IC population. So for instance I wouldn't be surprised if posters like SixSickSins and Kai scored highest in that regard out of the female posters and someone like And_So_It_Burns fits that category on the male side but unlike the aforementioned females he isn't well known on this forum.
Nonetheless, perceived academic credentials isn't solely what I take into consideration because there's lots of idiots who've obtain degrees - I've associated with plenty of them irl.
One salient question that I consider from my perspective: If we were in a group setting offline would the level of discourse drop off considerably from what they've shown here?
Anyway there's about 20-25 people that stick out to me on this forum in terms of intelligence/mental capacity and I don't agree with some of them on most topics.
Although some in that group have been mentioned in this thread, many of them haven't been mentioned which hilarious due to some of the names that have been. Some are clearly confusing knowledge on a topic or the ability to convey common sense on the internet with intellect. Just as some people I know in irl erroneously believe academic accomplishments are synonymous with intellect or IQ.
Hell, I'm pretty sure a portion of the posters listed in this thread wouldn't even be able to form an opinion on or even process complex topics like string theory or post-structuralism even if you gave them a few hours to google it and post about it in a thread. Yet it's quite a few that haven't been mentioned (many are my favorite posters and posters who I don't really give a lot of reactions to but respect nonetheless) that likely could pull that off with little to no difficulty.
Him. Lol.
