Getting NEWS from AHH is like quoting WIKIPEDIA on a RESEARCH PAPER
Options
yellowtapesport
Members Posts: 4,662 ✭✭✭✭✭
SMH at you ? that get your news stories from a hip hop site
That ? is funny and sad at the same time LOL
Ol 'some gunmen just shot up some ? out Cali, lemme log on to the IC for the scoop' ass ?
And them threads do numbers so lets not act like most of you ? ain't checkin for the latest national headlines....
On a ? hip-hop site. SMH.
That ? is funny and sad at the same time LOL
Ol 'some gunmen just shot up some ? out Cali, lemme log on to the IC for the scoop' ass ?
And them threads do numbers so lets not act like most of you ? ain't checkin for the latest national headlines....
On a ? hip-hop site. SMH.
Comments
-
-
wikipedia has sources you idiot, that's what you quote on the research paper not the ? wikipedia article itself
he won't understand this at all... -
wikipedia has sources you idiot, that's what you quote on the research paper not the ? wikipedia article itself
None of that ? will be accepted by 99.9% of professors anyway so....Brother_Five wrote: »
My degree says I don't need to -
I can be a source on Wikipedia...feel free to quote me:
"Pull your bottom lip over your face and swallow." -
wikipedia has sources you idiot, that's what you quote on the research paper not the ? wikipedia article itself
And just like that....
Freepost thread -
-
You ? .. people are watching/reading the coverage elsewhere
-
playmaker88 wrote: »You ? .. people are watching/reading the coverage elsewhere
Assumed by your assumption -
-
-
Damn @Brother_Five your reactions splattered through the comments like spots in ur pad my ?
Give ur feelings a break homie -
-
Everyone sources their stuff 95% of the time and then we ask for a source 5% of the time. I don't know what you are rambling about.
Wikipedia has sources bruh.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raccoon#Notes
Even the raccoon wiki has references and notes and where they gotten their resources from. It's not hard bruh. -
Conspiracy forum news>>>>>>>>>>
-
I know Wikipedia has sources but DO YOU KNOW the credibility of those sources??
NO. Cuz your crackhead uncle prob wrote a few articles on there. But carry-on -
yellowtapesport wrote: »wikipedia has sources you idiot, that's what you quote on the research paper not the ? wikipedia article itself
None of that ? will be accepted by 99.9% of professors anyway so....Brother_Five wrote: »
My degree says I don't need to
Don't nobody give a ? about that ICDC college degree except yo grandma -
yellowtapesport wrote: »wikipedia has sources you idiot, that's what you quote on the research paper not the ? wikipedia article itself
None of that ? will be accepted by 99.9% of professors anyway so....Brother_Five wrote: »
My degree says I don't need to
Don't nobody give a ? about that ICDC college degree except yo grandma
Yea my grandma and yo ? -
I hate the news, nothing but bad depressing news, if I had my way I would shut all that ? the ? down, the world would be happier.
-
yellowtapesport wrote: »I know Wikipedia has sources but DO YOU KNOW the credibility of those sources??
NO. Cuz your crackhead uncle prob wrote a few articles on there. But carry-on
Lol he still doesn't get it
-
yellowtapesport wrote: »I know Wikipedia has sources but DO YOU KNOW the credibility of those sources??
NO. Cuz your crackhead uncle prob wrote a few articles on there. But carry-on
That's your job to do the research buddy. Cross references. -
Ajackson17 wrote: »yellowtapesport wrote: »I know Wikipedia has sources but DO YOU KNOW the credibility of those sources??
NO. Cuz your crackhead uncle prob wrote a few articles on there. But carry-on
That's your job to do the research buddy. Cross references.
Or...use a credible source.
Work smart not hard -
Independent thinking is DYING
? willing to defend Wikipedia wit they lives smh -
-
The IC is just a vessel. 90% of the time the news is directly quoted from CNN, MSNBC, etc
No different from logging into your Yahoo account and they TELL you what the 'hot' stories are, and you choose to click
'Getting news from the IC' would be either
A) You literally see ? create threads like:
Yea this bama shootin in San Bernardino! Yea, i heard about it, it was 8 Isisessess"
B, Believing ? w/ no sources
or
C) Using bogus sources that you wouldn't find anywhere else , dimefreaknews.net
Unfortunately C is done by quite a few ( @blacksamson and @1cks ) and some ? follow -
yellowtapesport wrote: »Ajackson17 wrote: »yellowtapesport wrote: »I know Wikipedia has sources but DO YOU KNOW the credibility of those sources??
NO. Cuz your crackhead uncle prob wrote a few articles on there. But carry-on
That's your job to do the research buddy. Cross references.
Or...use a credible source.
Work smart not hard
Or the links you can easily see if they are credible sources. You cross reference to make sure it's a credible source.
