RIP Saints DE Will Smith smh
Options
Comments
-
So the killer's father was killed by the cop who Will Smith had just been kicking it with?
Crazy sh*t.
Another black dude dead, another black dude in prison and more black kids without their father(s).
Its sickening watching 13% of the population have a homicide rate as high as it is.
Yeah hit her twice in the leg
And sat there and waited for the police to come.
They're holding back a lot of details but it'll come out soon. -
your flyness wrote: »So reading the Mathieu tweet, that Fat Stacks must run in the same circles. And the tweets seems to point to that Smith was targeted. As it the fender ? was done to get him to stop (like the hood robberies where they bump your car first)
damn...never thought about it like that -
Wait the ? just sat and waited for the cops to pull up afterwards?
-
-
MY Theory
Dude probably felt played by the city of NO settling out of court for his father's death; He probably was scoping them out at dinner; gone off that boy (A lot of them dudes get high off heroin before they go to murder)
Probably mixed up and followed Smith instead of the Police officer that was with them, and shot the "wrong" person. -
Even Stephen A Smith didn't go full ? like the "why don't black lives matter talk about this" posters did about this...and you know he loves to pull that card.
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Stop feeding the troll
Trolling equals having a difference of opinion?? Got it. Let's focus on this slice of black killings and ignore this one. Makes a ton of sense... #blacklivesmatter
NO, you just sound dumb as ? , which is appalling because you are one of the more level headed posters on board.Ajackson17 wrote: »Rest in power brotha!
Silly cats arguing that BLM should be protesting killers that are caught and locked up. That was never their agenda in the first place and I agree they shouldn't be force to do that. That's a community and cultural problem that is local and should remained local. We should be maintaining our communities and have a individual organization designed for local issues such as this and outreach programs. But we know most of us are going to let our children absorb some of that bull ? and self hate ? until they pull the trigger and ending someone's life that looks like them because they don't have the heart to commit suicide. End of rant.
And this is what makes sense. Good ? -
Even Stephen A Smith didn't go full ? like the "why don't black lives matter talk about this" posters did about this...and you know he loves to pull that card.
Asking why a group that calls itself Black Lives Matter would only be concerned about when cops ? us but then completely disregard black on black violence is full ? ?? Lmao U got it, bruh.
Someone else mentioned that BLM shouldn't have to focus on black on black crimes because there are other groups that are already targeting that. Yet none of the other groups have gotten the media attention in recent years like BLM. This convo has went on long enough.
Those who agree will continue to agree. those who don't, wont. BLM assumes incorrectly that trying to talk logically to a well known terrorist group like the police is beneficial. It's been tried time and time again, to no avail, but I guess exercises in futility have some benefit. Cops now have cameras lol. What's even more hilarious is a lot of these BLM members and supporters believe there's an invisible hand pulling strings in the world, but will then think picketing and disrupting speeches will change anything. Good luck. Where them flags at?? Lol -
manofmorehouse wrote: »Even Stephen A Smith didn't go full ? like the "why don't black lives matter talk about this" posters did about this...and you know he loves to pull that card.
Asking why a group that calls itself Black Lives Matter would only be concerned about when cops ? us but then completely disregard black on black violence is full ? ?? Lmao U got it, bruh.
Someone else mentioned that BLM shouldn't have to focus on black on black crimes because there are other groups that are already targeting that. Yet none of the other groups have gotten the media attention in recent years like BLM. This convo has went on long enough.
Those who agree will continue to agree. those who don't, wont. BLM assumes incorrectly that trying to talk logically to a well known terrorist group like the police is beneficial. It's been tried time and time again, to no avail, but I guess exercises in futility have some benefit. Cops now have cameras lol. What's even more hilarious is a lot of these BLM members and supporters believe there's an invisible hand pulling strings in the world, but will then think picketing and disrupting speeches will change anything. Good luck. Where them flags at?? Lol
No it's going full ? to constantly say " how come nobody is addressing the violence" when it's addressed every damn day as y'all have been doing. Even if BLM doesn't address violence in the community to say because they aren't doing it nobody is is just factually incorrect. You got an issue with BLM then address them but don't say because you don't see them doing something that it's not being done at all. -
manofmorehouse wrote: »Even Stephen A Smith didn't go full ? like the "why don't black lives matter talk about this" posters did about this...and you know he loves to pull that card.
Asking why a group that calls itself Black Lives Matter would only be concerned about when cops ? us but then completely disregard black on black violence is full ? ?? Lmao U got it, bruh.
Someone else mentioned that BLM shouldn't have to focus on black on black crimes because there are other groups that are already targeting that. Yet none of the other groups have gotten the media attention in recent years like BLM. This convo has went on long enough.
Those who agree will continue to agree. those who don't, wont. BLM assumes incorrectly that trying to talk logically to a well known terrorist group like the police is beneficial. It's been tried time and time again, to no avail, but I guess exercises in futility have some benefit. Cops now have cameras lol. What's even more hilarious is a lot of these BLM members and supporters believe there's an invisible hand pulling strings in the world, but will then think picketing and disrupting speeches will change anything. Good luck. Where them flags at?? Lol
No it's going full ? to constantly say " how come nobody is addressing the violence" when it's addressed every damn day as y'all have been doing. Even if BLM doesn't address violence in the community to say because they aren't doing it nobody is is just factually incorrect. You got an issue with BLM then address them but don't say because you don't see them doing something that it's not being done at all.
When did I say that black on black violence wasn't being addressed?? Please point that out. We're addressing it on this forum!! I have a problem with BLM calling themselves black lives matter but only addressing it when it's police related. When did I ever state that, if BLM isn't discussing it, the issue isn't being addressed. This whole conversation started because I asked if BLM would address it lol -
This story is strange
RIP -
Won't you start up your own organization for addressing black on black crime
And the issue is being addressed is his point...just cause BLM doesn't lie there focus there doesn't discount the several organizations around the nation who do
All jokes aside, if you sat and thought about what you saying you'd realize how weird you sound
"If they're not going to address black on black violence, they shouldn't speak on racism "
-
your flyness wrote: »MY Theory
Dude probably felt played by the city of NO settling out of court for his father's death; He probably was scooping them out at dinner; gone off that boy (A lot of them dudes get high off heroin before they go to murder)
Probably mixed up and followed Smith instead of the Police officer that was with them, and shot the "wrong" person.
Dude was wearing a disheki too, so that theory maybe on some "getting back at the man" type ? too. -
Won't you start up your own organization for addressing black on black crime
And the issue is being addressed is his point...just cause BLM doesn't lie there focus there doesn't discount the several organizations around the nation who do
All jokes aside, if you sat and thought about what you saying you'd realize how weird you sound
"If they're not going to address black on black violence, they shouldn't speak on racism "
Is that really what u got from what I said?? Wtf?? U know what? U got it bruh -
Not even going to waste time debating lol...I'm done.
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »Won't you start up your own organization for addressing black on black crime
And the issue is being addressed is his point...just cause BLM doesn't lie there focus there doesn't discount the several organizations around the nation who do
All jokes aside, if you sat and thought about what you saying you'd realize how weird you sound
"If they're not going to address black on black violence, they shouldn't speak on racism "
Is that really what u got from what I said?? Wtf?? U know what? U got it bruh
I got it
That's how stupid your point is but in your head it makes sense -
Wait the ? just sat and waited for the cops to pull up afterwards?
Maybe he thought it was self defense -
-
Well damn.... -
It's not self defense if Will Smith retreated back to his car, the dude pulled the pistol out of his ? , walked up to Will Smith's car and shot his ? up hitting Will and his wife. This video won't help on the fact that he walked up to his car and shot it up. Now, if Will Smith was coming at him outside of his car and he had the gun pointed at him and warned him to stop and he still kept coming, then that's self defense, but shooting up the car won't fly unless Will told him directly that he was going to get his gun.
-
I knew the story sounded funny when it was said dude had road rage for rear ending someone, like who does that? Seeing the video above I now see why he was so upset, Will Smith tried to run after rear ending the Hummer. We can only guess why Smith ran from the initial accident, I'd guess cause he had been drinking, but we don't know. Dude was understandable ? and I'm not saying Smith should have been shot cause we don't really know what happen in the second incident.
All that being said I can't really see why someone had to die over a traffic dispute. -
Damn shame for life to be lost over some ? like this. He barely tapped him so why the hell did he peel off like that?
-
More than likely he was ? , any other sober person would have realized it wasn't that serious and would have stopped to exchange insurance information, the ? prolly thought he'd catch a DUI if the laws was around and saw that ?
-
damobb2deep wrote: »manofmorehouse wrote: »? is sad, man. We're out here exterminating ourselves. Ray Lewis was just taking heat for speaking on this ? . I wonder if BLM will speak to this type of senseless killing. RIP
BLM aint the problem bruh... ? need to stop acting like a situation like this is comparable to police brutality... cops are sworn to protect and held to a higher standard... that ? who killed dude does not have that same standard..
According to me he should still be held to a standard of not being a ? , which he failed. Go ahead and fry his ass so hardworking taxpayers don't have to pay for his 3 hots and a cot.
You can feel that way... but what does that have to do with BLM? and ? act like your tax money (which is a very small amount anyway) is giving these ? 5 star meals.. -
damobb2deep wrote: »manofmorehouse wrote: »? is sad, man. We're out here exterminating ourselves. Ray Lewis was just taking heat for speaking on this ? . I wonder if BLM will speak to this type of senseless killing. RIP
BLM aint the problem bruh... ? need to stop acting like a situation like this is comparable to police brutality... cops are sworn to protect and held to a higher standard... that ? who killed dude does not have that same standard..
Oh so that ? is not suppose to know that killing someone is wrong? He should just use "ignorance" as a defense ...stop defending these fools.
You acting like that man has a job that gives him rights to enforce law and protect people... he didnt... BLM... is defending black people who are hurt and killed for minor infractions of the law...
Iike getting killed for selling loose cigarettes.. or getting beat for a taillight being out... ect you dont see the problem and difference between that and a guy who has no police affiliation killing a person randomly with road rage?
http://youtu.be/F6jWeIfPoU8
