New Sexual Harassment Allegations Against Bill O’Reilly...
Options
Comments
-
I'm not with this vague "he made a comment" ? . This is why MSNBC has all those ugly Cacs on TV. Maddow and Andrea Mitchell won't be getting any kind of comments. The only one who is borderline is Mika and....she's messing with Morning Joe.
-
Heh, FNC aint even a little bit subtle about selling the sex.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Maximus Rex wrote: »I know it's a corporation as opposed to a municipality, but how are ? getting cash outs in the tens of millions of dollars because a muthafucka is trying to ? , but a citizen is killed by a racist white supremacist and his next of kin gets a settlement between $3 - $5 million dollars?
Because she likely has hard evidence that the public hasnt seen yet, that would bury mad people at fox news if made public.
You think a silly mid tier ? like her would be given a "40 million dollar going away present" if she didnt have the ? on video and audio.
IMO she played all of them. Next time you see her, shes gonna be a libertarian, smoking weed, and getting dicked by a minority. With a book about her ordeals at fox news, and how fake everyone is there. lol -
Rex is right though. how can you give someone millions for receiving rude comments? I get back pay, and maybe something close to around a few months pay, but 50 million?
This is why guys don't like working around attractive women, you have on walk on eggshells and not be your normal self. I can't stand O'Reily, but what did he really do other than having awkward conversations. No ? , no assault, no threatening of her job, nothing. And then she calls out Scott Brown randomly for coming on to her? -
We do not know that,what we do know is bill O'Reilly has had a previous sexual harassment lawsuit before so he has a history of this.ThaNubianGod wrote: »Rex is right though. how can you give someone millions for receiving rude comments? I get back pay, and maybe something close to around a few months pay, but 50 million?
This is why guys don't like working around attractive women, you have on walk on eggshells and not be your normal self. I can't stand O'Reily, but what did he really do other than having awkward conversations. No ? , no assault, no threatening of her job, nothing. And then she calls out Scott Brown randomly for coming on to her?
-
We do not know that,what we do know is bill O'Reilly has had a previous sexual harassment lawsuit before so he has a history of this.ThaNubianGod wrote: »Rex is right though. how can you give someone millions for receiving rude comments? I get back pay, and maybe something close to around a few months pay, but 50 million?
This is why guys don't like working around attractive women, you have on walk on eggshells and not be your normal self. I can't stand O'Reily, but what did he really do other than having awkward conversations. No ? , no assault, no threatening of her job, nothing. And then she calls out Scott Brown randomly for coming on to her?
True, but what she's claiming is that he offered an invitation to his place on Long Island when she sought career advice. This is normal in the professional world, but I'm seeing more and more not getting personally anymore because some women take it another way. Which is funny because when guys at work got together after hours without women, it was called sexist. Now maybe O'Rly was scheming to smash on the low, that's a possibility. The problem with this case is he didn't ask her anything sexual, nor did he touch her. She asked him for help, he offered, and then she claims sexual harassment. -
These are the same dudes who go out of their way to find the hottest women possible to sit up there and read the prompter. Anybody really surprised by any of this? The guy who was in charge, and the guy with the highest rated show and probably the biggest paycheck getting caught up in some ? like this? There's a bunch of horndogs in the news biz who hire these girls to try and live out their twisted fantasies lol.
-
ThaNubianGod wrote: »
We do not know that,what we do know is bill O'Reilly has had a previous sexual harassment lawsuit before so he has a history of this.ThaNubianGod wrote: »Rex is right though. how can you give someone millions for receiving rude comments? I get back pay, and maybe something close to around a few months pay, but 50 million?
This is why guys don't like working around attractive women, you have on walk on eggshells and not be your normal self. I can't stand O'Reily, but what did he really do other than having awkward conversations. No ? , no assault, no threatening of her job, nothing. And then she calls out Scott Brown randomly for coming on to her?
True, but what she's claiming is that he offered an invitation to his place on Long Island when she sought career advice. This is normal in the professional world, but I'm seeing more and more not getting personally anymore because some women take it another way. Which is funny because when guys at work got together after hours without women, it was called sexist. Now maybe O'Rly was scheming to smash on the low, that's a possibility. The problem with this case is he didn't ask her anything sexual, nor did he touch her. She asked him for help, he offered, and then she claims sexual harassment.
No its not. Intelligent men know that is disastrous. Why would you invite an attractive woman to you home for business advice? There's a Starbucks on damn near every corner. He was setting himself up for failure and he gets everything he deserves. -
Heh, FNC aint even a little bit subtle about selling the sex.
Seriously, the dresses are so short you can see if they color coordinated. -
Hold on.....
Where's Michelle Beadle at? She stays going at dude that are accused of ? like this....except, she only comes at guys like Floyd or Ray Rice or Greg Hardy.....the melanin-laden dudes. -
Hold on.....
Where's Michelle Beadle at? She stays going at dude that are accused of ? like this....except, she only comes at guys like Floyd or Ray Rice or Greg Hardy.....the melanin-laden dudes.
You already know what it is. -
Of course. I'm just trying to ? two birds with the same ? snowflake stone.
-
have been in many so called corporate environments......man these women be dressed like .....well anyway.
it has been said on here many times.....
they dress to get the attention from the people they like or those except compliments from those they like or to show other women they aint ? . very few dress because they like to look nice.
anyone else......very fine line -
"I got dirt on u doggy"
-
https://www.mediaite.com/online/oreilly-settled-32-million-sexual-harassment-claim-month-before-signing-fox-news-contract/O’Reilly Settled $32 Million Sexual Harassment Claim Month Before Signing Fox News Contract
Earlier this year, conservative TV host Bill O’Reilly was ousted from Fox News following a sexual harassment scandal. Following reports that he had paid out millions of dollars to settle multiple allegations of sexual harassment, O’Reilly was pushed out from the network that he had made home for over 20 years, during which time he had become the biggest star in cable news.
According to a new report by the New York Times, a month prior to O’Reilly signing a new contract extension with Fox News that would pay him $25 million annually for four years, he reached a $32 million agreement with a network analyst to settle sexual harassment allegations. And it appears the network was aware of that deal when O’Reilly signed his contract.
Although the deal has not been previously made public, the network’s parent company, 21st Century Fox, acknowledges that it was aware of the woman’s complaints about Mr. O’Reilly. They included allegations of repeated harassment, a nonconsensual sexual relationship and the sending of ? pornography and other sexually explicit material to her, according to the people briefed on the matter.
Per this latest piece, Fox News apparently tried to contain this story and stand by O’Reilly despite this coming to a head just months after Roger Ailes was pushed out as chief of the network over his long history of sexual harassment and misconduct. It was during this time that Megyn Kelly had decided to leave Fox News, so it appears the Murdochs wanted to retain their biggest star and reliable ratings machine.
Of course, it would be in April when the NYT came out with their bombshell report highlighting five settlements O’Reilly had reached over sexual harassment claims. It would be that report that would lead to O’Reilly’s departure from Fox News. However, prior to his being fired and after the Times report hit, O’Reilly warned the Murdochs that details of the January settlement would likely come out.
The settlement was made with Lis Wiehl, who worked as an analyst on Fox News for 15 years and appeared frequently on O’Reilly’s program. In a statement on the settlement, 21st Century Fox described it as a “personal issue between the two of them.”
-
-
Is nonconsensual sex anything like ?
-
https://www.mediaite.com/online/oreillys-attorney-once-again-the-new-york-times-has-maliciously-smeared-bill-oreilly/O’Reilly’s Spox: ‘Once Again, The New York Times Has Maliciously Smeared Bill O’Reilly’
Following today’s bombshell report by the New York Times detailing a $32 million deal former Fox News star Bill O’Reilly made to settle a sexual harassment allegation back in January, O’Reilly’s spokeseperson Mark Fabiani released a statement on behalf of the ex-O’Reilly Factor host.
In the statement, Fabiani writes that the Times has misrepresented the situation and didn’t include the sworn affidavit that accuser Lis Wiehl signed:
Once again, The New York Times has maliciously smeared Bill O’Reilly, this time even failing to print a sworn affidavit from his former lawyer, Lis Wiehl, repudiating all allegations against Bill O’Reilly. The Times ignored that evidence, sworn under oath, and chose to rely on unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous sources and incomplete leaked or stolen documents.
Fabiani also bragged about the “record breaking” contract that O’Reilly signed in February of this year, a month after he settled with Wiehl, while adding that April’s blockbuster by the Times that reported on O’Reilly’s other sexual harassment allegations included “inaccurate settlement figures.”
The affidavit that Fabiani sent that was signed by Wiehl states that she resolved her issues with O’Reilly following a draft complaint filed by her counsel, and would no longer make the allegations or complaints contained in the draft. -
-
-
-
$32 million for "alleged" ?
-
Hilarious. My dude said his investigative team has exposed the lies. So that mean he paid $32 million for something that coulda easily been exposed as a lie.
-
put this pinhead under the jail.
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
