R. Kelly Paid An Underage Woman Not To Speak. Now She’s Telling Her Story
Options
MR.CJ
Members Posts: 64,689 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
She looks like Oprah and Biz Markie had a baby -
Benefit of the doubt given because it involves R Kelly and we know his history. This is ? up.
-
I read the whole article.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimderogatis/r-kelly-underage-woman-speaks-out?utm_term=.tgqrYR2j0a#.uejj7znJv0
Kinda long.............but an interesting read.
2 things stand out.
At the beginning, she says she lied about her age and told him she was 19 when......in fact........she was only 15 or 16.
Towards the end of the article, she complains to her attorneys that she had only received a small portion of the settlement she was supposed to get.
Don't know how this is going to play out, because she did sign a non-disclosure agreement...........but I'm not sure that an agreement like that is legally binding if it encompasses not discussing what would've been an illegal act at the time.
However, if it is legally binding............anything she tries to say regarding that agreement could be ruled inadmissible in court.
The only thing that might go in R. Kelly's favor is that she lied about her age and is only complaining now because her money isn't right.
Other than that, if she decides to pursue criminal charges and can prove.................at some point during the course of their relationship............that she told R. Kelly she was 16, then there's a strong possibility he could end up doing some time.
However, if it's strictly a money thing...........he might be able to throw more money at her to get her to keep quiet. -
They want that money
-
Thank ? i needed this
-
Man this aint the hoe who got ? on ?
-
She lied about her age. Imo she cant get out unblemished in that ? .
-
"jethonda" 24 yrs old and 3 kids deep this ? lost already
-
I wanna know are these allegations true?
-
She lied about her age but she was still a child. The paperwork, she signed, means nothing since she was a kid.
And his sorry ass knew she was a child. Dude is a ? that ? on kids. ? dude
We'll be better off once we stop giving these ? ? a pass -
I read the whole article and I'm actually more disgusted with her mother than R Kelly. Her 15 year old daughter didn't go to school for two weeks so she could attend his sex trial. He's sending over chauffeur driven vehicles to the house to pick the girl up. The girl is spending weeks at a time at his mansion. R Kelly is a ? but he didn't kidnap the girl. Her mother pimped her out to R Kelly. Her mother signed the contract with the attorneys not the girl. Her mother sold her and did it legally. R Kelly keeps getting away with it because so called parents keep supplying the girls. This is another money grab, it has nothing to do with seeking justice.
-
I don't think "? " is technically the correct word but I'm sure it's close enough to pass. If he did this, it's probably a wrap for the pied piper, even if it's clear she lied.
Unless we're in opposite world where the NDA would actually be worth something. -
Kinda long.............but an interesting read.
2 things stand out.
blackgod813 wrote: »Thank ? i needed this
-
babelipsss wrote: »I read the whole article and I'm actually more disgusted with her mother than R Kelly. Her 15 year old daughter didn't go to school for two weeks so she could attend his sex trial. He's sending over chauffeur driven vehicles to the house to pick the girl up. The girl is spending weeks at a time at his mansion. R Kelly is a ? but he didn't kidnap the girl. Her mother pimped her out to R Kelly. Her mother signed the contract with the attorneys not the girl. Her mother sold her and did it legally. R Kelly keeps getting away with it because so called parents keep supplying the girls. This is another money grab, it has nothing to do with seeking justice.
You are 100% spot on. R. Kelly is a ? bag but the parents in these cases appear to be even bigger ? bags. -
These parents are as bad as the sick ? kellz.
All for money -
Eh.....i'mma state the obvious from a male mindstate...
she doo doo.
she know she grew up to be doo doo.
whatever flower that was there the pied piper of K thru 12 saw wilted.
unless a ? got her up to this for the bread...she doing this cuz she know deep down she doo doo.
ain't no broad that feel good about herself under no real ? making her feel good got time for this ? unless the previous line applies. If not, this her only play in life cuz kellz still got a name.
You can hate me now....idgaf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdf-kIvOag4
-
numbaz...80's baby wrote: »She lied about her age but she was still a child. The paperwork, she signed, means nothing since she was a kid.
And his sorry ass knew she was a child. Dude is a ? that ? on kids. ? dude
We'll be better off once we stop giving these ? ? a pass
STOP IT RIGHT NOW! please !! She was supposed to hang out with her friends. She was underaged and supposed to be at home doing her homework.
SHE WASNT SUPPOSED TO STAY MORE THAN 1 MINUTE WITH ANY ADULT. ok its RKelly her fav RNB singer : an autograph,a pic THEN BOUNCE BACK HOME!!
She has seen his millions and fame, he has seen her ? . We call that A CONTRACT!! SHE AINT DUMB, she didnt lie to the average Joe : she was ROOKIE HOEING !!!
She has CALCULATED, but she was inexperienced, and got screwed explicitly and figuratively.
She was looking for an easy way: a baby by RKelly.
Im giving a pass to NOBODY :
- the parents who are instilling HOE MINDSET in their dauggters ' head,
- the sick ass men who deal with them
- these rookie hoe ass young women who think that they are smarter than their elders.
Just like the parents who let them sons sleep with Michael Jackson.
Everybody is GUILTY. Everybody in Jail!! That way the fuckery will stop.
Child are at home at night, in class during the day. Not with RKelly. -
R Kelly is the manifestation of our materialistic, pimpalistic, all money is good money western society. If not he would have been shot years ago at a scholl parking lot. He would have been flagged for that Alyah wedding and in jail.
-
babelipsss wrote: »I read the whole article and I'm actually more disgusted with her mother than R Kelly. Her 15 year old daughter didn't go to school for two weeks so she could attend his sex trial. He's sending over chauffeur driven vehicles to the house to pick the girl up. The girl is spending weeks at a time at his mansion. R Kelly is a ? but he didn't kidnap the girl. Her mother pimped her out to R Kelly. Her mother signed the contract with the attorneys not the girl. Her mother sold her and did it legally. R Kelly keeps getting away with it because so called parents keep supplying the girls. This is another money grab, it has nothing to do with seeking justice.
Real ? -
Kelly is a predator and these parents involved are predators..And seems like most of the girls are scumbags .
-
I read the whole article.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimderogatis/r-kelly-underage-woman-speaks-out?utm_term=.tgqrYR2j0a#.uejj7znJv0
Kinda long.............but an interesting read.
2 things stand out.
At the beginning, she says she lied about her age and told him she was 19 when......in fact........she was only 15 or 16.
Towards the end of the article, she complains to her attorneys that she had only received a small portion of the settlement she was supposed to get.
Don't know how this is going to play out, because she did sign a non-disclosure agreement...........but I'm not sure that an agreement like that is legally binding if it encompasses not discussing what would've been an illegal act at the time.
However, if it is legally binding............anything she tries to say regarding that agreement could be ruled inadmissible in court.
The only thing that might go in R. Kelly's favor is that she lied about her age and is only complaining now because her money isn't right.
Other than that, if she decides to pursue criminal charges and can prove.................at some point during the course of their relationship............that she told R. Kelly she was 16, then there's a strong possibility he could end up doing some time.
However, if it's strictly a money thing...........he might be able to throw more money at her to get her to keep quiet.
The article also says she gave him her state id showing she was 16... -
My first reaction:Why the ? is a 15 year old at a child pornography trial? R Kelly ? up when she gave him her id showing she was 16 and he still kept ? her..where the ? where her parents when your kid misses 2 weeks of school and is in news papers being quoted and you have no idea?....and if she did sign a non disclosure agreement its probably nullified by her speaking out and she's at risk for being sued so the cash grab angle really holds no weight....
-
I read the whole article.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimderogatis/r-kelly-underage-woman-speaks-out?utm_term=.tgqrYR2j0a#.uejj7znJv0
Kinda long.............but an interesting read.
2 things stand out.
At the beginning, she says she lied about her age and told him she was 19 when......in fact........she was only 15 or 16.
Towards the end of the article, she complains to her attorneys that she had only received a small portion of the settlement she was supposed to get.
Don't know how this is going to play out, because she did sign a non-disclosure agreement...........but I'm not sure that an agreement like that is legally binding if it encompasses not discussing what would've been an illegal act at the time.
However, if it is legally binding............anything she tries to say regarding that agreement could be ruled inadmissible in court.
The only thing that might go in R. Kelly's favor is that she lied about her age and is only complaining now because her money isn't right.
Other than that, if she decides to pursue criminal charges and can prove.................at some point during the course of their relationship............that she told R. Kelly she was 16, then there's a strong possibility he could end up doing some time.
However, if it's strictly a money thing...........he might be able to throw more money at her to get her to keep quiet.
The article also says she gave him her state id showing she was 16...
Yeah...? ....but the "Fiesta" remix....you gon front on that??? -
to hell with you stone throwers and accusers kellz can do no wrong!
-
I read the whole article.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimderogatis/r-kelly-underage-woman-speaks-out?utm_term=.tgqrYR2j0a#.uejj7znJv0
Kinda long.............but an interesting read.
2 things stand out.
At the beginning, she says she lied about her age and told him she was 19 when......in fact........she was only 15 or 16.
Towards the end of the article, she complains to her attorneys that she had only received a small portion of the settlement she was supposed to get.
Don't know how this is going to play out, because she did sign a non-disclosure agreement...........but I'm not sure that an agreement like that is legally binding if it encompasses not discussing what would've been an illegal act at the time.
However, if it is legally binding............anything she tries to say regarding that agreement could be ruled inadmissible in court.
The only thing that might go in R. Kelly's favor is that she lied about her age and is only complaining now because her money isn't right.
Other than that, if she decides to pursue criminal charges and can prove.................at some point during the course of their relationship............that she told R. Kelly she was 16, then there's a strong possibility he could end up doing some time.
However, if it's strictly a money thing...........he might be able to throw more money at her to get her to keep quiet.
The article also says she gave him her state id showing she was 16...
Yeah...? ....but the "Fiesta" remix....you gon front on that???
You mean the remix with the homie from the Midwest side? Lol
