Hollywood Sex Abuse Scandal Thread - Harvey , Kevin, Andy etc
Options
Comments
-
They're saying that Russel Simmons is on the summer jam screen. Well ? C called him out years ago.
Also Benny Medina. Producer of The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air. He's a ? man that is friends with Clive Davis and L.A. Reid.
Also The Fresh Prince show is based off his own life. -
black caesar wrote: »They're saying that Russel Simmons is on the summer jam screen.
he like em young or was he a perv? -
Russel Simmons name always comes up
-
-
black caesar wrote: »They're saying that Russel Simmons is on the summer jam screen. Well ? C called him out years ago.
Also Benny Medina. Producer of The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air. He's a ? man that is friends with Clive Davis and L.A. Reid.
Also The Fresh Prince show is based off his own life.
Uh oh -
DarthRozay wrote: »and Sean Connery missed on something crazy like $500 million because they offered him a nice back end deal if he took the gandalf role in LOTR but he turned it down
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen turned him off from acting for good -
Was on the set of Natural Born Killers
Edit... Hol up that dont add up if it was 2003
Reading conflicting stories -
So Sizemore who was in Natural Born Killers... Was removed from the set of a film called Born Killers in 2003.
A film nobody has seen starring a bunch of nobodys. -
black caesar wrote: »They're saying that Russel Simmons is on the summer jam screen. Well ? C called him out years ago.
Also Benny Medina. Producer of The Fresh Prince Of Bel-Air. He's a ? man that is friends with Clive Davis and L.A. Reid.
Also The Fresh Prince show is based off his own life.
Uh oh
-
? on there Adam Schefter in here with up to the minute updates and ? lol
-
KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role. -
KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
She did, tf? -
Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol
Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture -
Ok, how are yall "hearing" who up next? Yall know ? private investigators?
-
fortyacres wrote: »Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol
Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture
Not exactly hip-hop, but Chris Stokes has had ? allegations against him for years. LA Reid was facing sexual harassment allegations awhile back. Afrika Bambaataa. What's done in the dark eventually comes to the light (no AccompanyMeToHeaven). -
fortyacres wrote: »Heard Lars Von Trier might be next im really not surprised lol
Surprised that Hiphop musicians aint been exposed like that yet, coz im pretty sure there has been some really questionable behaviour in the culture
Already mentioned Lars Von Trier on here, though I wouldn't be surprised if there was more dirt. Björk has already aired him out twice (in detail) with the backing of her manager, plus the likes of Nicole Kidman and Paul Bettany absolutely despise him. He's been known in the past to treat actors like ? and Cannes already banned him for antisemitism.
https://www.facebook.com/bjork/posts/10155782628166460
Edit: Just had a look and yeah, there's more women coming out against him. The man is ? . -
KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable. -
Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
This is kinda a false equivalency
RDJ had to do much more with less. -
Lars von Trier’s Production Company Faces Sexual-Harassment Allegations
After Björk claimed the Danish director sexually harassed her on the set of Dancer in the Dark, numerous women are accusing von Trier’s company of creating a hostile work environment.
Weeks after Björk accused director Lars von Trier of harassing her on the set of the 2000 film Dancer in the Dark, nine women who worked for von Trier’s production company are claiming that it was a hostile environment full of degradation and sexual harassment, per Variety. The claims were originally published in a report by Danish newspaper Politiken.
The women who came forward allege that Zentropa, a Scandinavian company von Trier co-founded with Peter Aalbæk Jensen, was a toxic place to work. Former employees claim that Jansen groped their ? and spanked them. He used the company Christmas party, they allege, as a platform for “several sexually degrading acts.”
“I think that everyone who has been employed by Zentropa has been exposed to or witnessed certain things—both sexually charged acts and bullying or ‘teasing.’ All of this was an ingrained part of the culture,” said Meta Louise Foldager Sørensen, a producer who worked there from 2006 to 2010. She co-produced the von Trier films Antichrist and Melancholia.
Anne Mette Lundtofte, a writer who worked there for three years and published the book Zentropia, said she “saw women being degraded” in a workplace that reinforced “an old-fashioned, patriarchal power structure.”
Aalbæk Jensen told Politiken he has “no interest in submission and humiliation [but he’s] interested in challenging boundaries, even up to the red line.”
Anders Kjærhauge, the company’s managing director, told Politiken the allegations “are personal experiences and I am sad that this is how they feel, but this is not the Zentropa I know.”
He said that the company is working with its employees to establish clear guidelines moving forward. “We will initiate a process with our employees in order to prepare a more clear vision in regards to what is a good working place. Zentropa has always been an act of balance between art and business, between rules and chaos, between women and men, between challenging boundaries and respecting boundaries, and so forth. The various discussions and writings in Denmark has made it clear to us that we need to make a ‘service check’ on our act of balance.”
The company’s management also released a statement on Monday: “The company culture at Zentropa will continue to be colourful and alterative, but we do not wish to violate anyone’s rights or insult anyone.”
Representatives for von Trier have not responded to Vanity Fair’s request for comment.
The allegations arrive a few weeks after Björk posted a lengthy Facebook message alleging that she was sexually harassed when she starred in Dancer in the Dark, though she did not explicitly name either the director or the film. (Instead, she alluded to a “Danish director” on a film set; Björk has appeared in just a handful of feature films, and just one, Dancer in the Dark, was directed by a Dane.) In her message, Björk was immediately uncomfortable, alleging that “humiliation” and sexual harassment were a routine part of the job.
"I became aware of that it is a universal thing that a director can touch and harass his actresses at will and the institution of film allows it,” she wrote.
Von Trier soon denied her allegations. “That is not the case—although we didn’t get along, that’s a fact. . . . On the other hand, she delivered one of the greatest-ever performances in my movies,” he told Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, via Variety.
His denial emboldened Björk to double down on her claims. She responded by writing a second Facebook post, this time detailing von Trier’s alleged behavior, including unwanted touching, violent behavior, inappropriate sexual offers, and “fabricated” rumors that painted her as a difficult star to work with—pointing directly to the false report that she ate her own shirt during production.
“If being difficult is standing up to being treated like that, I’ll own it,” she wrote. Also: “I have never eaten a shirt. Not sure that is even possible.”
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/11/lars-von-trier-production-company-zentropa-allegations -
Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on -
Idiopathic Joker wrote: »Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity. -
fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.
He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular -
Idiopathic Joker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.
He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular
the numbers dont support your argument
Iron Man 3
$409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)
Iron Man 2
$312,433,331
Iron Man
$318,412,101
Captain America
$176,654,505
Cap:Winter Soldier
$259,766,572
Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
$408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)
they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it -
fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.
He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular
the numbers dont support your argument
Iron Man 3
$409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)
Iron Man 2
$312,433,331
Iron Man
$318,412,101
Captain America
$176,654,505
Cap:Winter Soldier
$259,766,572
Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
$408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)
they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it
People were gonna see Spiderman anyways after his performance in Civil War. He's Spiderman. The franchise for Marvel. -
Idiopathic Joker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Idiopathic Joker wrote: »Like Water wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.KingFreeman wrote: »
Flexed on em. She about to get that Katherine Heigl treatment tho.
? thinking that she made that movie pop off. It was gonna pop off no matter who they put in the role.
No, it wouldn't have. WW is DC at the moment. Everything else from them has sucked. Gal Gadot is to WW what Robert Downey is to Iron Man. She literally has the DC universe on her back.
Barring death, or some ridiculously damaging scandal, she is currently irreplaceable.
I'd replace RDJ with Chris Evans but other than that, spot on
nope, RDJ is the anchor to the MCU's popularity.
He was, and still is a top dog, but Cap is the most popular
the numbers dont support your argument
Iron Man 3
$409,013,994 (1.2 Billion Worldwide)
Iron Man 2
$312,433,331
Iron Man
$318,412,101
Captain America
$176,654,505
Cap:Winter Soldier
$259,766,572
Cap:Civil War (With Ironman/RDJ as main co star)
$408,084,349 (1.1 Billon worldwide)
they had to put RDJ in Spiderman Homecoming to ensure people come and see it
People were gonna see Spiderman anyways after his performance in Civil War. He's Spiderman. The franchise for Marvel.
It was a stale franchise on its 3rd reboot with an unknown kid star they needed a big draw , thus the joint deal with Sony & Marvel/Disney, for them to do something fresh with it to ensure success this is why RDJ was brought onboard to help sell this movie , this is well documented.