MissAllhiphop.com 7™ CROWNING CEREMONY LIVE ON TINYCHAT17 TONIGHT 6pm/9est
Options
Comments
-
KatMistyKnight wrote: »
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
You think it's possible for a bisexual guy to just be more into guys than girls? Like 70% guys and 30% girls?
Technically it would make then MORE ? but still bisexual.
Right?..
Nah its like the one drop rule.
If there is a slight hint of faggotry, .000001%, that man is 100% ? , just hasnt acted on it yet.
I feel like straight men can find another man attractive but be 100% straight.
Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? . -
BiblicalAtheistdalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Dude u been wit for a few months tells u he's sucked a ? in his life...not a problem wit chu huh?
I don't know. I'm an open minded person. I would ask a lot of questions.
Lol...what u gone ask..how it taste?
Get da ? outta here Westie
U know good and damn well...
? you do.not.? .know.me.
Word.... -
MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »But again, I have no desire to be romantically involved....Like I can never date and tell her I love her and ? . I am just not interested in that AT ALL.
Edited minor parts of your post to say.....
Sounds like u just hard on hoes
I thought about that.
Does that make me a bad person or ? bag though?
It's not like a woman ever hurt me to make me not have interest in dating them/being romantically involved.... It's just how I'm built.
Its fine embrace it. ? baggetry is a skill not many possess.
These women are objects to u. Only there to feed your ? n make u a sandwich.
U good b
This conclusion makes me sad.
Is that really who I am?
I mean, I care about women and their feelings and ? . I just don't care FOR them... Except for sexual purpos.....
Yeah...... The more I type, the more I realize how ? I sound.
Youre HOH all the way. Soon youll only ? with single mothers for that tax money. When they give u lip youre gonna lock that ? up in your glove box n say "guess ur not gettin ? tonight, but i still need my feet rubbed" -
KatMistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »But again, I have no desire to be romantically involved....Like I can never date and tell her I love her and ? . I am just not interested in that AT ALL.
Edited minor parts of your post to say.....
Sounds like u just hard on hoes
I thought about that.
Does that make me a bad person or ? bag though?
It's not like a woman ever hurt me to make me not have interest in dating them/being romantically involved.... It's just how I'm built.
Its fine embrace it. ? baggetry is a skill not many possess.
These women are objects to u. Only there to feed your ? n make u a sandwich.
U good b
This conclusion makes me sad.
Is that really who I am?
I mean, I care about women and their feelings and ? . I just don't care FOR them... Except for sexual purpos.....
Yeah...... The more I type, the more I realize how ? I sound.
Youre HOH all the way. Soon youll only ? with single mothers for that tax money. When they give u lip youre gonna lock that ? up in your glove box n say "guess ur not gettin ? tonight, but i still need my feet rubbed"
Super sad face. -
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math. -
BiblicalAtheist@wesite let me ask u a question
Do u believe that the way I am online is the way I am offline -
Kat
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
It's been ingrained in you that anything that veers off the straight and narrow is homosexual and that equals bad. That doesn't mean no straight man has never been curious. You're not allowed to explore. Doesn't mean the feeling isn't there. Doesn't mean a straight man or 2 even in your life hasn't experimented behind closed doors. Society beats it into you, and men in general. That doesn't change anything inside you tho. -
Kat
Idc -
BiblicalAtheist
That hurt way more than I thought it would -
Kat
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
You think it can possibly be more of a male ego thing though?
Like if homosexuality wasn't as taboo/ frowned upon (especially in certain cultures) , then everyone would be more open to entertaining the idea that a truly bisexual man does exist?
Sure, he might be more into guys then girls... But if he does crave the ? sometimes... Then is he really 100% ? ?
Help me understand... -
MistyKnight wrote: »Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? .
Youre trollin now
Some ? like that will get u time in the Pause Pod
-
KatMistyKnight wrote: »Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? .
Youre trollin now
Some ? like that will get u time in the Pause Pod
I've seen straight dudes compliment other dudes on their appearance though.
Like "Damn bruh, you built! That's wassup!"
Which translates to "Damn ? you is fine!"
I've seen a few dudes on here sweat @Black_Samson... Don't make them ? tho.
-
MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? .
Youre trollin now
Some ? like that will get u time in the Pause Pod
I've seen straight dudes compliment other dudes on their appearance though.
Like "Damn bruh, you built! That's wassup!"
Which translates to "Damn ? you is fine!"
I've seen a few dudes on here sweat @Black_Samson... Don't make them ? tho.
"Damm bruh u built!" Is suspect, which is a whole other thang.
And is also different than "your muscles look nice fam" -
KatMistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? .
Youre trollin now
Some ? like that will get u time in the Pause Pod
I've seen straight dudes compliment other dudes on their appearance though.
Like "Damn bruh, you built! That's wassup!"
Which translates to "Damn ? you is fine!"
I've seen a few dudes on here sweat @Black_Samson... Don't make them ? tho.
"Damm bruh u built!" Is suspect, which is a whole other thang.
And is also different than "your muscles look nice fam"
I think saying "your muscles look nice" sounds more sus... Tbh.
It's like "what else you think look nice?"
-
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
It's been ingrained in you that anything that veers off the straight and narrow is homosexual and that equals bad. That doesn't mean no straight man has never been curious. You're not allowed to explore. Doesn't mean the feeling isn't there. Doesn't mean a straight man or 2 even in your life hasn't experimented behind closed doors. Society beats it into you, and men in general. That doesn't change anything inside you tho.
If you were datin a guy n found out he got ? in his ass multiple times u probly wouldnt stay with him very long much less consider him fathering a child of yours.
I dont even know u, but im pretty sure of that tho.
N if he did do it he wouldnt tell u.....bc he dont want u to know that hes ?
Gayer than blinking lights on a christmas tree -
MistyKnight wrote: »
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
You think it can possibly be more of a male ego thing though?
Like if homosexuality wasn't as taboo/ frowned upon (especially in certain cultures) , then everyone would be more open to entertaining the idea that a truly bisexual man does exist?
Sure, he might be more into guys then girls... But if he does crave the ? sometimes... Then is he really 100% ? ?
Help me understand...
Bisexual men exist to ? men. Bisexual men are ? to straight men. -
Atribecalledgabi@Sion
-
MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Yall ? ever watch a movie and a super buff good looking dude come on screen and you say "Damn!" "that's a good looking dude"... No ? .
Youre trollin now
Some ? like that will get u time in the Pause Pod
I've seen straight dudes compliment other dudes on their appearance though.
Like "Damn bruh, you built! That's wassup!"
Which translates to "Damn ? you is fine!"
I've seen a few dudes on here sweat @Black_Samson... Don't make them ? tho.
"Damm bruh u built!" Is suspect, which is a whole other thang.
And is also different than "your muscles look nice fam"
I think saying "your muscles look nice" sounds more sus... Tbh.
It's like "what else you think look nice?"
Theyre both sus. The way a real hetero man would compliment a man who works out regularly is by saying "idc how big yo muscles is ill still beatcho ass!" -
BiblicalAtheistBrad Pitt is a handsome man
-
-
Kat
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
It's been ingrained in you that anything that veers off the straight and narrow is homosexual and that equals bad. That doesn't mean no straight man has never been curious. You're not allowed to explore. Doesn't mean the feeling isn't there. Doesn't mean a straight man or 2 even in your life hasn't experimented behind closed doors. Society beats it into you, and men in general. That doesn't change anything inside you tho.
If you were datin a guy n found out he got ? in his ass multiple times u probly wouldnt stay with him very long much less consider him fathering a child of yours.
I dont even know u, but im pretty sure of that tho.
N if he did do it he wouldnt tell u.....bc he dont want u to know that hes ?
Gayer than blinking lights on a christmas tree
So if someone ? women and men and has attraction to them both, they're ? . Explain the logic in that please. -
BiblicalAtheist
U would let yo girl stay wit brad Pitt for a week? -
I'm aware there are double standards. Doesn't make somebody fully ? tho, just because people have biases.dalyricalbandit wrote: »MistyKnight wrote: »Once ur tongue touches a woman ur bisexual. I know lots a women that would never
See, that's what hubby says.
But I feel like there are some women who just like to experiment.. Whether it's one time or whatever.
Also, there's alot of ? that do ? porn for the money, or suck ? for money during hard times... Doesn't necessarily mean their ? .... Right?
once a dude does that aint no coming back he's ? forever aint no such thing as unsucking a ? (Pause)
There's a such thing as experimenting and going back. Sexuality can be fluid.
Sexuality can be fluid but double standards are real.
If a chick likes chicks, good for her.
Only ppl thats into ? dudes is ? dudes.
Bisexuality is only for women. Even if a guy enjoys both equally hes still ? .
Again for a girl ? both genders = not fully ?
For a guy even CONSIDERING suckin ? but not doin it = fully ?
Yeah, you can say it like that all you want. Still aint true. Biases don't equal facts.
The only people that would disagree with me are females and ? men. U do the math.
It's been ingrained in you that anything that veers off the straight and narrow is homosexual and that equals bad. That doesn't mean no straight man has never been curious. You're not allowed to explore. Doesn't mean the feeling isn't there. Doesn't mean a straight man or 2 even in your life hasn't experimented behind closed doors. Society beats it into you, and men in general. That doesn't change anything inside you tho.
If you were datin a guy n found out he got ? in his ass multiple times u probly wouldnt stay with him very long much less consider him fathering a child of yours.
I dont even know u, but im pretty sure of that tho.
N if he did do it he wouldnt tell u.....bc he dont want u to know that hes ?
Gayer than blinking lights on a christmas tree
So if someone ? women and men and has attraction to them both, they're ? . Explain the logic in that please.
I already did
Girl ? guys and girls = not fully ?
Guy ? guys and girls = fully ?
Females get penetrated....a girl cant ? inside a girl.
A ? man can bust a nut in another man.
U better hurrup n understand cuz this convo getting to ? for me
Disclaimer: nh -
Westie
Go figure posted a gif of Brad Pitt and nearly got some e-? by association. That man is fine..especially Fight Club Brad Pitt. -
BiblicalAtheist
Ima need u to relax
