What do you make of WIKILEAKS?
Options
elzo69
Confirm Email Posts: 2,707 ✭✭
Comments
-
explain what that is?
im not up on the white boy phrases -
texasboi409 wrote: »explain what that is?
im not up on the white boy phrases
get your intelligence game up my ? . anyway, its a little too early to tell cuz they are exposing some things but if u read some of it, it can be made for a case to go to war with Iran. They could be a CIA front but they could be also doing us a service and letting us know whats really up with our government. Now if they dropped some ? on 9/11 then i'd believe fully that they're the real deal. -
I approve of the information/document posting.
Keeps things interesting. -
I know one thing, since those hackers jammed up their server the whole netz been slow today, so it seems to me
-
Yea I mean that ? is crazy, it ll get someone killed.
-
A double edged sword. And yes, someone may get killed, it's that serious.
-
They need to drop somethin on 9/11 and the inside job that it is, like homie said earlier they could be a front. I heard there CEO or whatever is on the lamb for some kind of Molestation charges in Norway or Sweeden?????????????
-
bruh that ? ain't cool IMO
it def will get some poor mofos killed over some ? being exposed
freedom ain't free -
its always some ? ......aye we just had a fine ass muslim wannabe terror man out here in portland he's 19 his name was muhhamad something ? that boy is fine as ? !!..
-
louis the great wrote: »They need to drop somethin on 9/11 and the inside job that it is, like homie said earlier they could be a front. I heard there CEO or whatever is on the lamb for some kind of Molestation charges in Norway or Sweeden?????????????
I just read that the US govt is looking to take legal action against them. So if its a front then they are doing a good job at it. -
Aquaf!nafloe wrote: »its always some ? ......aye we just had a fine ass muslim wannabe terror man out here in portland he's 19 his name was muhhamad something ? that boy is fine as ? !!..
BEAT IT yo this is for smart and educated posters only -
BEAT IT yo this is for smart and educated posters only
shut up i can come in wit my side comment i dont wanna be part of this conversation anyways....deuces... -
louis the great wrote: »They need to drop somethin on 9/11 and the inside job that it is, like homie said earlier they could be a front. I heard there CEO or whatever is on the lamb for some kind of Molestation charges in Norway or Sweeden?????????????
putting ? out there, so people can't say they were never told the truth, they just ignored it because the gov. didn't release the info themselves -
Aquaf!nafloe wrote: »shut up i can come in wit my side comment i dont wanna be part of this conversation anyways....deuces...
Au revoir ? -
putting ? out there, so people can't say they were never told the truth, they just ignored it because the gov. didn't release the info themselves
But what good would that do, if it was a front? -
But what good would that do, if it was a front?
Make a case for war with Iran....u saw it said basically all of their neighboring countries feel like they should be dealt with somehow. -
-
But what good would that do, if it was a front?
makes em sleep better at nite, kinda like a ? that cheats and indirectly tells her man, it makes her less concerned with feeling guilty if the dude chose to ignore the facts -
dmv_use2thewait wrote: »Make a case for war with Iran....u saw it said basically all of their neighboring countries feel like they should be dealt with somehow.
I feel u on that but then y not just drop that i mean the report goed into ? that deals w more than Iran. Spying on diplomats and etc... but i feel u tho -
The cables are part of the daily traffic between the State Department and some 270 embassies and consulates and, according to the Times, amount to a secret account of Washington's relations with the world in an era of global terrorism.
Among disclosures that could potentially cause a problem for Washington, according to The Guardian, are fears in Washington and London over Pakistan's nuclear program; suspected links between the Russian government and organized crime; criticism of British military operations in Afghanistan; and claims of inappropriate behavior by a British royal family member.
The Times cited "gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea: American and South Korean officials have discussed the prospects for a unified Korea, should the North's economic troubles and political transition lead the state to implode. The South Koreans even considered commercial inducements to China, according to the American ambassador to Seoul. She told Washington in February that South Korean officials believe that the right business deals would 'help salve' China's 'concerns about living with a reunified Korea' that is in a 'benign alliance' with the United States.''
The Times also cited "suspicions of corruption in the Afghan government: When Afghanistan's vice president visited the United Arab Emirates last year, local authorities working with the Drug Enforcement Administration discovered that he was carrying $52 million in cash. With wry understatement, a cable from the American Embassy in Kabul called the money 'a significant amount' that the official, Ahmed Zia Massoud, 'was ultimately allowed to keep without revealing the money's origin or destination.' (Mr. Massoud denies taking any money out of Afghanistan.)"
The Times said that more than 251,287 cables, first obtained by WikiLeaks, were obtained by the newspaper from an intermediary to whom the newspaper promised anonymity. Many of the documents, the Times said, were unclassified and none were marked "top secret." But some 11,000 are classified "secret."
Heres part of the article. -
Who are "wikileaks" getting this information from?
What "high ranking individual" would be irresponsible enough to pass off information that can be traced back to them? -
I feel u on that but then y not just drop that i mean the reportgoed into ? that deals w more than Iran. Spying on diplomats and etc... but i feel u tho
Yeah, i feel what u sayin....thats why i'm not sure if its a front or not. I don't think those diplomats were that naive thinking that they weren't being checked up on either though. They gotta make the site look like its on your side, in order for you to back it and keep up your trust in it for whatever they got coming next. but i could be wrong....thats why i'm 50/50 on that site til i see some 9/11 stuff because with that its either it was an inside job or it wasn't. -
dmv_use2thewait wrote: »Yeah, i feel what u sayin....thats why i'm not sure if its a front or not. I don't think those diplomats were that naive thinking that they weren't being checked up on either though. They gotta make the site look like its on your side, in order for you to back it and keep up your trust in it for whatever they got coming next. but i could be wrong....thats why i'm 50/50 on that site til i see some 9/11 stuff because with that its either it was an inside job or it wasn't.
Yea i think it is coming tho the 9/11 stuff -
Yea i think it is coming tho the 9/11 stuff
if it does...all hell is breaking loose, foreal. -
dmv_use2thewait wrote: »if it does...all hell is breaking loose, foreal.
i m looking forward to that but trust someone is getting JFKd if that happens....
