So, a ? was on the cover of Playboy
Options
Comments
-
To be honest I saw the original news headline w/ the words "? " and "Playboy" and ignored the ? out of it.
-
@DoubleShotHelix ...I feel u on that fam! I didn't have a choice on being black. All that born this way ? is for marketing. They made a conscious choice 2 play whatever position they wanna play. Heard a racists ass sounding CAC on a web show say some real ? as 2 Y he don't trust the ? and trans community Said: "Any man or woman that would " purposely" put themselves in harm's way harming their own body 2 is a very dangerous person. If they're willing 2 do this 2 themselves, what will they do or allow happen to me and my business?". I felt that.
-
-
Lol getting offended over playboy?
-
blue_london wrote: »Lol getting offended over playboy?
offended.. there is a bigger picture here..
i dont think one needs to be spoon fed to know.. -
Really wish agenda mfers would get another word other than "problematic".
? is so overused and normally accompanied by nonsense that soon as it is said most people especially myself just automatically roll my eyes and begin to tune out the snowflake ass diatribe that's about to follow.
The word problematic has ironically become problematic -
Playboy magazine will feature a transgender Playmate, a decision that Cooper Hefner, a top executive at the magazine, said on Thursday was in keeping with its founding mission of embracing changing attitudes about sex.
-
Playboy's full of ? . It's one thing to put a black WOMAN in their magazine at a time when the country was far more racist than today, but to put a MAN in Maybelline their magazine ain't even close to being the same. They're being intellectually dishonest with them tweets and they know it. -
fortyacres wrote: »who gives a ?
Well when they compare this to highlighting black women, who are women, this is a big issue.
To equate trannie issues with black issues is problematic but "who cares?"
Tbh that's black female's fault. They stay linking up with the she boys and conflating issues even tho they are conflicting.
Ion collect playboy so to each his own. -
Wait how did african Americans get drug in this....
People returned their magazines and unsubscribed when you had your first black playmate...and now they do it for transsexuals but don’t make it seem as if , since we accept blacks now, we might as well accept abnormal sexual behavior/ identity.....
Accepting humans or the refusal to accept humans is different than accepting sexuality -
jetlifebih wrote: »Wait how did african Americans get drug in this....
People returned their magazines and unsubscribed when you had your first black playmate...and now they do it for transsexuals but don’t make it seem as if , since we accept blacks now, we might as well accept abnormal sexual behavior/ identity.....
Accepting humans or the refusal to accept humans is different than accepting sexuality
because these homosexuals and mentally confused muhfuckas always trying to parallel their "struggle" with the Civil Rights Movement. They stay comparing themselves to Black folks. -
I don't care more power to her, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior. -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »I don't care more power to her, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior.
Wiz look like a ? though. she prolly found out and it was a wrap
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »I don't care more power to him, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior.
fixed that for ya.
Plus, show me ONE straight chick that's a sympathizer to these trannys that's willing to date a female-to-male ? . All that ? will go right out the window and a flood of excuses will commence. For that matter, all them straight men out there claiming "transwomen are real women" ain't finna date or ? a ? either. -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »I don't care more power to her, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior.
Isnt that ? ? shaming? -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »I don't care more power to her, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior.
Isnt that ? ? shaming?
Don't give that washed ? anymore ideas -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »I don't care more power to her, the only issue I have with this agenda is that women force this on men, but then arent sexually accepting of men who are bisexual.
Im willing to bet money that the majority of women would be turned off by a guy who said he ? /been ? by a guy/transexual. ? , Amber Rose said she wouldnt have sex with a guy thats been with dudes. Thats hypocritical as ? , yet demonize men for the same behavior.
Isnt that ? ? shaming?
EXACTLY -
Also Tyson Beckford had no problem with her, but Im not gonna post the pictures cuz I'll be Flagged into Bolivia
-
I guess they are trying to expand their base. I doubt many will buy that ? . They are basically telling you a fake woman is on the cover and thinking that ? is ok.
I never purchased a playboy. Like, why? It was basically a magazine for kids to rip pages out, bring to school, and look at in the restroom during gym. The bush game was serious back then. Then some ? ass kid would tell the teacher...
Yeah, that was kind of detailed...... -
unspoken_respect wrote: »I guess they are trying to expand their base. I doubt many will buy that ? . They are basically telling you a fake woman is on the cover and thinking that ? is ok.
I never purchased a playboy. Like, why? It was basically a magazine for kids to rip pages out, bring to school, and look at in the restroom during gym. The bush game was serious back then. Then some ? ass kid would tell the teacher...
Yeah, that was kind of detailed......
We were trading whole magazines back inna day. Playboy was lightweight. We had Hustler, Oui, ? , High Society, Chic, Players, Players Pictorial, Genesis, and the occasional issue of Swank.
I used to have this brown Nike duffel bag under my bed that had 12-14 ? magazines in it and my moms found it while I was staying with my dad the summer after the 7th grade. My stepfather had to intervene on that one 'cause she was finna light my ass up but he calmed her down and let me know he didn't care that I had 'em, but I gotta hide 'em better. -
I hate these ? parallels the LBGT community try to make between what happened with blacks and what's happening between them. So now not wanting to see a woman of a different shade is the same as not wanting to see a woman in a man's body? -
So glad I no longer watch porn, these days you could be wanking to a bloke and not even know it.
-
Preach2Teach wrote: »So glad I no longer watch porn, these days you could be wanking to a bloke and not even know it.
Usually pornos are good about labeling trannies. -
fortyacres wrote: »who gives a ?
Well when they compare this to highlighting black women, who are women, this is a big issue.
To equate trannie issues with black issues is problematic but "who cares?"
Tbh that's black female's fault. They stay linking up with the she boys and conflating issues even tho they are conflicting.
Ion collect playboy so to each his own.
White women are much more cool with ? than black women.
They be out here marching for them much more than AA women -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »
I hate these ? parallels the LBGT community try to make between what happened with blacks and what's happening between them. So now not wanting to see a woman of a different shade is the same as not wanting to see a woman in a man's body?
And in all seriousness, a lot of folks in the LGBTQ community are as racist as ? too.
