The Official World Politics Thread - All Breaking News here.
Options
Comments
-
No posts about this?The bombshell revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund the controversial anti-Trump dossier last year has lawmakers and the media asking tough questions about how the dubious document was used by the highest levels of U.S. law enforcement – and why Democrats “lied” about its origins.
So..? -
-
-
Let's be fair though, that Hillary ? is damning if true and we shouldn't condone it just because she's "on our side".
That being said, it pales in comparison to what Trump's doing, done, and being accused of. -
why are these ? retiring stay and fight
-
Btw thanks to Senate last night we won't be able to sue banks or financial institutions
-
-
C da Night King wrote: »Let's be fair though, that Hillary ? is damning if true and we shouldn't condone it just because she's "on our side".
That being said, it pales in comparison to what Trump's doing, done, and being accused of.
how is it damning when the RNC did that in the primary as well ?
its just another nonsense distraction tactic , Hillary aint in the picture no more this aint no campaign , this dude been in office 10 months now and aint got ? to show for it other than trynna ? up our institutions thats what’s important here -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Btw thanks to Senate last night we won't be able to sue banks or financial institutions
Why are people not talking about this more?
Forcing everyone into financial gridlock and fuckery. -
C da Night King wrote: »Let's be fair though, that Hillary ? is damning if true and we shouldn't condone it just because she's "on our side".
That being said, it pales in comparison to what Trump's doing, done, and being accused of.
I assume you're referring to the dossier. Aint ? damming about it.
First off, the dossier was initially funded by a republican to get dirt on Trump during the primaries and then was abandoned. Thats where Clinton's team stepped in.
Second, its called opposition research. There isnt nothing wrong with looking into dirt on your opponnent. Stand your ground ?
-
naledgestate wrote: »Trump will attack N. Korea within the next 6 months. I say that with a fair amount of certainty.
Trump is unhinged and has romanticized war and does not give a ? about soldiers and their lives.
Stanford University released an analysis and predicted that 1 million people will die within the first day in a war between the U.S. and N. Korea.
Not to mention an invasion of N. Korea will be a ? storm that would make Vietnam look like a cake walk.
? will be ugly. Buckle up.
But...
Jay-Z concerts.
And Emails... -
Must have never heard of swiftboat...uhh wikileaks. That 25 year Clinton hate campaign was a rousing success
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Btw thanks to Senate last night we won't be able to sue banks or financial institutions
Send me a couple of links. Trying to find out more -
Shizlansky wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Btw thanks to Senate last night we won't be able to sue banks or financial institutions
Send me a couple of links. Trying to find out more
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-arbitration-rule-senate-20171024-story.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-senate-banks-credit-card-companies-lawsuits-20171024-story.html
http://fortune.com/2017/10/25/senate-vote-bank-class-action-lawsuit-arbitration/ -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Shizlansky wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Btw thanks to Senate last night we won't be able to sue banks or financial institutions
Send me a couple of links. Trying to find out more
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-arbitration-rule-senate-20171024-story.html
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-senate-banks-credit-card-companies-lawsuits-20171024-story.html
http://fortune.com/2017/10/25/senate-vote-bank-class-action-lawsuit-arbitration/
Appreciate it -
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/michigan-truck-driver-charged-threatening-trump-s-life-multiple-times-n814001Truck Driver Charged in Michigan With Threatening Trump’s Life Multiple Times
A truck driver was charged in newly unsealed court documents with threatening multiple times to assassinate President Donald Trump over the course of more than a month.
Little information about the man, identified as James Anthony Jackson, was made available in a criminal complaint unsealed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Detroit.
The complaint said only that Jackson is a truck driver and that he was born in 1984.
The documents don't directly say that Jackson is even in custody, but the motion to unseal the case said he was no longer considered a flight risk. No hometown, attorney or court dates were recorded.
According to an affidavit filed by the Secret Service, Jackson began making rambling, obscene phone calls to Secret Service field offices in Detroit and Chicago on Sept. 17. More calls were made on Oct. 12, 13 and 18, the affidavit said.
In one of the calls, Jackson raged against Trump and said he was going to blow the "white brains out of ... his ... head," according to the Secret Service.
NBC News has redacted the full quotations because of their extreme language.
The Secret Service said Jackson managed to "spoof" the caller ID information transmitted by his phone, making it difficult to track him down. Once agents determined the phone's real number, the Secret Service traced the device to a company called James Jackson Profit Group LLC in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Contact information wasn't listed for the company, which isn't registered in state business records.
The Secret Service said Jackson used the same phone to harass an unidentified woman who said he called himself "Jamie." According to the Secret Service, "Jamie" threatened to "cut off her head and parade it in front of the White House for Trump."
Relatives of Jackson told investigators that they had lost contact with him for about a year until he started making harassing, threatening calls to them, as well.
If he's convicted, Jackson could face five years in federal prison.
-
so trump campaign asked wikileaks for help to find clinton's email the reporter who broke the story right now said the white house didn't deny it campaign reach out to assange but he turned it down so he says
According to sources close to a congressional investigation who spoke to the Daily Beast, Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix emailed Assange to lend a helping hand in the distribution of the 33,000 missing emails, but Assange declined. In a statement after the Daily Beast’s report, the WikiLeaks founder confirmed that the exchange took place. If so, “this would be the closest known connection between Trump’s campaign and Assange,” writes the Daily Beast.
The missing emails became a focus for Trump during the campaign—at one point the candidate publicly called on Russia to release them, and a political operative working with the campaign had sought help from hackers to obtain them, the Wall Street Journal reported. But the emails have never been published, and it’s unclear if anyone has them. -
-
Zero ? given ben carson
-
“Somewhere between 1 and 100,”
-
naledgestate wrote: »C da Night King wrote: »Let's be fair though, that Hillary ? is damning if true and we shouldn't condone it just because she's "on our side".
That being said, it pales in comparison to what Trump's doing, done, and being accused of.
I assume you're referring to the dossier. Aint ? damming about it.
First off, the dossier was initially funded by a republican to get dirt on Trump during the primaries and then was abandoned. Thats where Clinton's team stepped in.
Second, its called opposition research. There isnt nothing wrong with looking into dirt on your opponnent. Stand your ground ?
Playing the "they did it first so it's ok that we did it" argument is exactly what they do.
And Trump Jr. was just doing opposition research too, right? Didn't the dossier come from someone with Russian connections?
Just saying, if it's wrong for Trump Jr. it's wrong for Hillary. -
C da Night King wrote: »naledgestate wrote: »C da Night King wrote: »Let's be fair though, that Hillary ? is damning if true and we shouldn't condone it just because she's "on our side".
That being said, it pales in comparison to what Trump's doing, done, and being accused of.
I assume you're referring to the dossier. Aint ? damming about it.
First off, the dossier was initially funded by a republican to get dirt on Trump during the primaries and then was abandoned. Thats where Clinton's team stepped in.
Second, its called opposition research. There isnt nothing wrong with looking into dirt on your opponnent. Stand your ground ?
Playing the "they did it first so it's ok that we did it" argument is exactly what they do.
And Trump Jr. was just doing opposition research too, right? Didn't the dossier come from someone with Russian connections?
Just saying, if it's wrong for Trump Jr. it's wrong for Hillary.
-
Richard Painter is that ?
-
-
Every time I see but her emails I never fail to laugh... Her emails will never be as bad as ed miliband losing because a bacon sandwich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuUcUoH7CAk
