CNN: Having older brothers increases men's likelihood of being ?
Options
Comments
-
Oldest on my whole dad’s side of the family.
? damn I’m straight -
Fifth born. Fifth boy. I've got two lil brothers tho' so them ? got the ? alie?
-
These ? threads got these ? feeling some type of way.
Next month there's gonna be a study that says if you eat sausage more than three times a month you might be a ? . -
I hope people ain't taking this so called research seriously, but just to point out ? like this when people say there's no ? agenda.
I look at this along the lines of the whole "born-? " theories. -
-
These ? threads got these ? feeling some type of way.
Next month there's gonna be a study that says if you eat sausage more than three times a month you might be a ? .
and exactly what type of way is that, ? ?
more ? than you were when you read the thread?
u dont like women, fammo.
super fact.
-
Busta Carmichael wrote: »
Which is pretty weird considering I only use this browser for the IC (because of it's built-in VPN) and I've had ads for Bugatti, McLaren, Asian/Russian/Latino dating sites, SAS, and other tech ? but not once have I searched for any of that. If I need to search for something like a gif to use as a reply I use a completely separate browser. -
These ? threads got these ? feeling some type of way.
Next month there's gonna be a study that says if you eat sausage more than three times a month you might be a ? .
Depends how you eat the sausage.
-
Will Munny wrote: »Oldest on my whole dad’s side of the family.
? damn I’m straight
I'm the oldest on both sides of the family.
-
konceptjones wrote: »Will Munny wrote: »Oldest on my whole dad’s side of the family.
? damn I’m straight
I'm the oldest on both sides of the family.
Ironically - you know they used to say Sherman Hemsley was ? right ?
Not that they don't say that about every celeb. Just sayin tho. -
All the ? with mad older brothers in here protesting. Lol.
-
I just read another new study that said if you eat male animals you're ?
-
konceptjones wrote: »Will Munny wrote: »Oldest on my whole dad’s side of the family.
? damn I’m straight
I'm the oldest on both sides of the family.
Ironically - you know they used to say Sherman Hemsley was ? right ?
Not that they don't say that about every celeb. Just sayin tho.
Never heard that about him. -
mryounggun wrote: »All the ? with mad older brothers in here protesting. Lol.
im convinced that mad ? is just ? , mad and confused about themselves and in threads like this where their gayness can be questioned, they act out in strange ways.
bunch of "UNH-UH" ass ? in here. if the ? said "studies show that having older brothers increases men's likelihood of having larger ? ", ? would be in here like "youngest of 5 brothers checking in".
yall some weirdo silly ? . -
HerbalVaporCapers wrote: »I just read another new study that said if you eat male animals you're ?
But only if you're a dude -
CeLLaR-DooR wrote: »They wanna prove faggism is biological bad
I would say so. Everything we do is biological. -
This explains why my cousin had a ? dog, last out the ? and litter was mostly male.
Little ? ignored ? and targeted male dogs. -
konceptjones wrote: »Will Munny wrote: »Oldest on my whole dad’s side of the family.
? damn I’m straight
I'm the oldest on both sides of the family.
Ironically - you know they used to say Sherman Hemsley was ? right ?
Not that they don't say that about every celeb. Just sayin tho.
Sherman Hemsley might have been. But that's George Jefferson. LMAO!!! -
Obviously doing some foolish research here. They have no proof of what determines attraction and if a molecule as big as a protein was responsible for this then they would know it long ago in the thousands of physiology and molecular biology experiments done.
This is a psychology, a field of research that blends science and arts to formulate hypothesis. They ride the coat tails of real scientists and make all kinds of bold claims like this. Those of you who went to college for a science degree and had to take psych classes will know exactly what I'm talking about.
-
Ajackson17 wrote: »CeLLaR-DooR wrote: »They wanna prove faggism is biological bad
I would say so. Everything we do is biological.
Nah King we all have psychological and societal influences -
CeLLaR-DooR wrote: »They wanna prove faggism is biological bad
Well unless you can pinpoint when you consciously chose to like whoever you like then go ahead. Because a choice means options meaning you had to consider something else...and not once in my life have I had to make a choice. I've always loved women. There was no other option -
Busta Carmichael wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »
Eh, if I had a ? search history, you know I would have zero problem saying so.
I got the Papa John's ad on one of Kap's thread when Papa John's had their anthem statement and I didn't have them in the search history either.
http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/104936/if-you-was-in-prison-for-life-would-u-smash-a-? /p5
I ain't gonna quote what your clearly ? search resulted in, but... you know... the ? is out there. On top of that the ? search result was accompanied by ? that could only be made by someone of the ? persuasionR0mp wrote:If it were these two, I'd bend both of 'em over the nearest bunk, and ? 'em right up the ? , ZERO ? given. Yeah I said it, ? . -
Busta Carmichael wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »
Eh, if I had a ? search history, you know I would have zero problem saying so.
I got the Papa John's ad on one of Kap's thread when Papa John's had their anthem statement and I didn't have them in the search history either.
Bruh u have legit posted trannies on multiple occasions.
There is literally no way u can save face.
You can get ads for something whether it is in your search history or not was the point.
And there is no face to save.
Case in point on certain ads coming up for certain threads and ads coming up whether it's in your search history or not:
-
Everyone thinks everything is right until its wrong, and then when its wrong, it was never right to begin with.
-
Everyone thinks everything is right until its wrong, and then when its wrong, it was never right to begin with.
That's some deep ? .