The Repeal of Net Neutrality

Options
1567911

Comments

  • TheGOAT
    TheGOAT Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 15,916 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    What about the IC?

    Will it be affected?

    1st it was The Maven.... Now dis :'(
  • farris2k1
    farris2k1 Members Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Max. wrote: »

    How is suing going to get them to reverse the decision? Doesn't make sense to me.

    ? illegal plus itll slow it down if its caught up in a ton of lawsuits
  • northside7
    northside7 Members Posts: 25,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2017
    Options
    ? keep our land glorious and free!

    And I pray it stays like that.

    You American folks are going to have it rough if this goes through.
  • 2stepz_ahead
    2stepz_ahead Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 32,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    this will ? large protests and filter much needed info to the poor.
  • Qiv_Owan
    Qiv_Owan Members Posts: 4,125 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    this will ? large protests and filter much needed info to the poor.

    Elaborate on that one bruh
  • 5th Letter
    5th Letter Members, Moderators, Writer Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    Options
    a.mann wrote: »
    So basically with this repeal internet providers will now be allowed to BLOCK or SLOW DOWN service for specific apps or websites, and CHARGE users MORE MONEY for using streaming services like Netflix,Youtube,HULU etc

    The people who will be hit hardest by this,of course are poor and low income communities( i.g. black communities)

    Which is why President Obama, "" who never did ANYTHING for black people!"" was against repealing NN and fought to keep the internet as is..where regardless of your financial status you still have the same web speed and web browsing service as everyone else

    Remind me again who put him there in the first place.
  •  i ro ny
    i ro ny Members Posts: 8,459 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • sunlord
    sunlord Members Posts: 515 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    ? LUPE and his opinion
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2017
    Options
    Cain wrote: »
    a.mann wrote: »
    This affects online gaming as well,right?

    Yep, they can slow the bandwidth down and make you pay more.

    Porn lovers are really going to get hit.
    a.mann wrote: »
    This affects online gaming as well,right?

    Comcast had a deal with Xbox so yeah they could slow down the online gaming for PS4 servers if they wanted to

    That would be counter productive. Microsoft cant pay them enough to cover the cost of people leaving Comcast because they refuse to get Xbox’s due to Comcast throttling speeds for PS.

    They would have to pay Comcast enough to cover the cost of doing so. And enough to cover the cost of value lost due to a weaker standing in the stock market due to people leaving, and threatening to leave Comcast. That’s way to much of an investment than they would be willing to make.

    In addition to that it would be a PR ? storm.
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2017
    Options
    Look people, cable companies do not have to capcity to provide the bandwidth for which it sells. It is very very expensive to have everyone allocated speeds up to and above 500mbps. It’s very very costly

    But they aren’t going to tell u that because what u say u can’t do. It won’t stop the next company from lying to u and saying they can.

    So these companies seem to be in truce mode. Because the only way they can cost effectively provide everyone with the bandwidth they need to provide reasonable ping time is to have control in directing traffic.

    They can’t just give u have a gig step back and say have at it. Even tho it’s what they sell you. They can’t...you been lied to and before it all implodes. ? like this happens. It’s not as much as an attack on consumer as it is an admission of guilt in lying to consumers.

    That attack already came, people were just made to believe the attack was a benefit. When the benefit didn’t truly exist
  • trilladelic
    trilladelic Members Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    They claim they're doing this to increase competitiveness but I've literally watch AT&T and Comcast swallow up nearly all the smaller isp's in my area..

    I hope this comes back to bite them in the ass..
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    That ? is artificial growth, it’s called edge out. It’s meant to trick Wall Street to believe inflated numbers about subs to convince them the company is growing. Thus keeping their price high and allowing them to gain money to pay off debts and repeat the same process.
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    For some reason ever since block buster, there’s a stronger belief in business that if u aren’t growing ur dying. It’s stupid and totally not the reason they and all these other companies went under.

    They went under because they believed their own hype and not in innovation. Basically, so many of these companies are ran by idiots surrounded by yes men.
  • Hevalisk
    Hevalisk Members Posts: 1,595 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Germz101 wrote: »
    Look people, cable companies do not have to capcity to provide the bandwidth for which it sells. It is very very expensive to have everyone allocated speeds up to and above 500mbps. It’s very very costly

    But they aren’t going to tell u that because what u say u can’t do. It won’t stop the next company from lying to u and saying they can.

    So these companies seem to be in truce mode. Because the only way they can cost effectively provide everyone with the bandwidth they need to provide reasonable ping time is to have control in directing traffic.

    They can’t just give u have a gig step back and say have at it. Even tho it’s what they sell you. They can’t...you been lied to and before it all implodes. ? like this happens. It’s not as much as an attack on consumer as it is an admission of guilt in lying to consumers.

    That attack already came, people were just made to believe the attack was a benefit. When the benefit didn’t truly exist

    I don't have a problem with them throttling speeds to 10-20 Mbps when anything faster is unnecessary, ? you only need around 2-3 Mbps for online gaming.(is that gonna stop them pushing 100+ Mbps plans on people?), it's having the ability to block or slow to a snails pace any traffic they dislike that I have issue with.
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2017
    Options
    Hevalisk wrote: »
    Germz101 wrote: »
    Look people, cable companies do not have to capcity to provide the bandwidth for which it sells. It is very very expensive to have everyone allocated speeds up to and above 500mbps. It’s very very costly

    But they aren’t going to tell u that because what u say u can’t do. It won’t stop the next company from lying to u and saying they can.

    So these companies seem to be in truce mode. Because the only way they can cost effectively provide everyone with the bandwidth they need to provide reasonable ping time is to have control in directing traffic.

    They can’t just give u have a gig step back and say have at it. Even tho it’s what they sell you. They can’t...you been lied to and before it all implodes. ? like this happens. It’s not as much as an attack on consumer as it is an admission of guilt in lying to consumers.

    That attack already came, people were just made to believe the attack was a benefit. When the benefit didn’t truly exist

    I don't have a problem with them throttling speeds to 10-20 Mbps when anything faster is unnecessary, ? you only need around 2-3 Mbps for online gaming.(is that gonna stop them pushing 100+ Mbps plans on people?), it's having the ability to block or slow to a snails pace any traffic they dislike that I have issue with.

    They would have no need to, say Netflix. Netflix has a lot of traffic. It causes congestion, u get a Netflix server and all traffic is directed through that pipe line to lesson the load on overall traffic.

    And that’s in peak times, then the burden isn’t on the company. The burden is on Netflix is either update their equipment to handle the more thorough and efficient load. Or they themselves throttle speeds or block ips that originate from that domain.

    And that’s worse case scenario with a company that a lot of people use that service.
  • Germz101
    Germz101 Members Posts: 355 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2017
    Options
    The object of the game is subs..if u have the ability to give all subs efficient ping times by controlling traffic effiently. Why ruin that by u urself hindering those subs when u don’t need to?
  • Lab Baby
    Lab Baby Members Posts: 8,154 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    i ro ny wrote: »

    "Personal relationship with the internet"... this ? talkin about the internet like it's ? . ? celebrities. Download everything.