CNN Rick Sanchez dropped that ether on John Stewart and the jews, he got fired! lol

Options
1246

Comments

  • anthony7q
    anthony7q Members Posts: 782
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Around 2,000 years ago, the last group of black people left the land of Israel during the Roman invasion. They crossed the land bridge to join their people in Egypt who had left earlier. Soon thereafter most of these black people migrated south and west into Africa, where they settled among the many African tribes who had been living there for many millennia. Their migration into the African continent occurred at the same time that the natives of Egypt also migrated deeper into Africa. They abandoned their great civilization after the invasion of the semites and others, mostly Persians, Greeks, and Romans.

    By this time the religion practiced by the ancient Hebrews had gone into such deep secrecy that it was practiced by only a few who were initiated into it. In the meantime, the superficial form of their religion had gained a large following among the semites who would later be known as Jews.
    At the early period of the unfolding of these events, the name 'semites' did not yet exist. These people were simply known as the second race from the fact that they were the second white/light skinned race to branch off. But I use the name 'semite' because it defines them better than any other name in modern times. That race includes all the non-black people of today's middle east and north Africa, including Pakistanis, Persians, Jews, non-black Indians and so on.
    The Jews re-interpreted the religion of the ancient Hebrews so much that it was barely recognizable by the time of Jesus 2,000 years ago. Today this version is being practiced in Israel and other places where Jews live and is called Judaism. The other semites, Arabs, Persians, etc, practice a version of Yahweh's religion that was brought much later by Muhammad.

    (the upon was taken from an online study group)
  • CMac
    CMac Members Posts: 5,748 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Yo good drop I heard that ? on the radio and wondered why, Rick was a G he kept it real to the end. I guess that's so long to The Rick's list, we need more people like him on the news.

    If he's smart he will just go to radio and get his own show, that way he can make much more money.
  • jackthemack
    jackthemack Members Posts: 11,491 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Yo And Step's sig is some uncalled for ether lmao
  • Skeratch
    Skeratch Members Posts: 1,395 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Razah Cutz wrote: »
    whoa, whoa, whoa....so now we hatin on Jewish cats?

    Sanchez may of just stated the truth in regards to Jews runnin CNN, but Jon Stewart ain't no bigot....i'll say that much....

    and SMH @ sticking up for Sanchez...duke is a republican/conservative and a minority AKA the worst type of dumb muthafucka there is...

    Sanchez was just hot b/c Stewart stay clowning his ? and his ? show...and yes, Sanchez's show is dumb as as ? ...he covers ? fluff stories non-stop and the important stories he tries to cover and interview ppl about he ? sounds so out of his depth....

    now, I know Rick came up tough, so yeah, that's peace that he know the struggle, but I' sorry, I gotta call a ? a ? and what he said bout Stewart wasn't true...period! And that's from a Latino muthafucka!!

    This right here should be repeated.
    Swiffness! wrote: »
    this is key

    Did anyone here ever watch Sanchez's show? ? was ? terrible in a multitude of ways and epitomized everything that's wack about cable news.

    The Daily Show rips apart the cable news networks every other episode. Rick was just mad about that ether Stewart would habitually pour on his head....

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-1-2010/the-uninformant

    And this.

    Rick Sanchez is a windbag, Jon Stewart is a funny dude who's usually on point.
  • Swiffness!
    Swiffness! Members Posts: 10,128 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    garv wrote: »
    To compare the two in the first place just shows how incredibly stupid you are.

    Yeah, you're right. You can't compare an extermination program that killed 2/3rds of Europe's Jewish population to lynchings and slavery. Clearly the Holocaust is worse in that regard. Now if we were talking Middle Passage vs Holocaust....it'd be another story.

    Stop it 5. The point wasn't to compare them, the point is to note that anyone who says "Look, that genocide was wrong and all, but I understand why they committed genocide" is ? ? or insane.
  • And Step
    And Step Members Posts: 3,726 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    It wasn't just Jews that were killed in Germany. Many Ethnic groups suffered the same fate. Serbians, Polish, Slavic, ? , Jehovah Witnesses, Romanians among others.

    I wonder what ? had against the Jehovah Witnesses? They must have knocked on his door too early.
  • Skeratch
    Skeratch Members Posts: 1,395 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    And Step wrote: »
    It wasn't just Jews that were killed in Germany. Many Ethnic groups suffered the same fate. Serbians, Polish, Slavic, ? , Jehovah Witnesses, Romanians among others.

    I wonder what ? had against the Jehovah Witnesses? They must have knocked on his door too early.

    True, but the largest group that was affected was Jews:

    Jews - 5-6 million
    Serbs - 350,000
    Poles - 1.8 million
    Slavs - 1 million
    ? - less than 15,000
    Jehovah's Witnesses - less than 5,000
    Mentally ill or disabled - 200,000
    Roma - between 200,000 and 500,000

    Jehovah Witnesses were targeted because they don't serve in the military or carry out oaths.
  • KTULU IS BACK
    KTULU IS BACK Banned Users Posts: 6,617 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    And Step wrote: »
    Baaaaaaah. A genetic study done by Jewish volunteers?

    I knew you wouldn't believe it because it was done by the Jews. You're the typical confirmation bias victim. You will refuse to believe anything that doesn't go along with your pre-conceived notions. You didn't have any problem with Jewish sources when they were agreeing with you, obviously.

    And you're a ? .
  • KTULU IS BACK
    KTULU IS BACK Banned Users Posts: 6,617 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    btw, the reason they fired sanchez is that he's a ? who has repeatedly embarrassed himself on CNN

    they couldn't just fire him for being dumb tho because he's Hispanic and it might look racist

    so they waited until he said something that could be racist and then got rid of him
  • anthony7q
    anthony7q Members Posts: 782
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Skeratch wrote: »
    True, but the largest group that was affected was Jews:

    Jews - 5-6 million
    Serbs - 350,000
    Poles - 1.8 million
    Slavs - 1 million
    ? - less than 15,000
    Jehovah's Witnesses - less than 5,000
    Mentally ill or disabled - 200,000
    Roma - between 200,000 and 500,000

    Jehovah Witnesses were targeted because they don't serve in the military or carry out oaths.

    Homosexuality in ? Germany
    From Conservapedia
    Jump to: navigation, search
    Homosexuality was supported in ? Germany, although modern ? rights activists claim that an estimated 100,000 homosexual men were arrested for this crime, of whom approximately 5,000 to 15,000 were interned in concentration camps.[1] See Homosexuals and the Holocaust for further details.

    Yet, according to some historians, homosexual men constituted the core of the ? Party in Germany.[2] In contrast to the wimpy "swish" homosexual, ? homosexuals were ultra-macho or "butch".

    The OSS addressed the reason why so many homosexuals found the ? party inviting,

    “ this may be due to the fact that they are all fundamentally social outcasts and consequently have a community of interests which tends to make them think and feel more or less alike. In this connection it is interesting to note that homosexuals, too, frequently regard themselves as a special form of creation or as chosen ones whose destiny it is to initiate a new order....The fact that underneath they feel themselves to be different and ostracized from normal social contacts usually makes them easy converts to a new social philosophy which does not discriminate against them. Being among civilization's discontents, they are always willing to take a chance of something new which holds any promise of improving their lot...[3] ”

    Bryan Fischer of the Idaho Values Alliance writes,

    “ Even today in America, it is chic in some homosexual circles for individuals to wear replicas of ? Germany uniforms, complete with iron crosses, storm trooper outfits, military boots and even swastikas. ”

    In 1941 the Office of Strategic Services prepared A Psychological Analysis of Adolf ? . Langer attributed the belief of many that ? was homosexual "(a) from the fact that he does show so many feminine characteristics, and (b) from the fact that there were so many homosexuals in the Party during the early days and many continue to occupy important positions." Langer added, "It does seem that ? feels much more at ease with homosexuals."

    Some parts of the American ? movement are explicitly homosexual. The National Socialist League, a group that existed from the mid to late seventies, restricted its membership to homosexual Nazis.[4]

    Scott Lively wrote:

    “ "Most people don't realize that male homosexuality does not always lean to the effeminate. Historically, male homosexuality was much more often associated with hyper-masculine warrior cults which were usually very brutal and very politically aggressive. The most recent example was in Germany. ? 's initial power base when he launched the ? Party was a private homosexual military force organized and trained by a notorious pederast named Gerhard Rossbach. Rossbach's homosexual partner Ernst Roehm, who was also ? 's partner in forming and building the ? Party, converted the "? " Rossbachbund into the dreaded SA Brownshirts."
  • KTULU IS BACK
    KTULU IS BACK Banned Users Posts: 6,617 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    anthony7q wrote: »
    From Conservapedia

    wtf lol are you ? ?
  • The Prime Minister
    The Prime Minister Members Posts: 2,883 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    wtf lol are you ? ?

    I always knew you were a jew.

    I don't discriminate though. I'll skeet in a jew ? 's fat ass and when she turn up pregnant then I'll be off grid just like all the other stereotypical Black men.

    Word.
  • And Step
    And Step Members Posts: 3,726 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    I knew you wouldn't believe it because it was done by the Jews. You're the typical confirmation bias victim. You will refuse to believe anything that doesn't go along with your pre-conceived notions. You didn't have any problem with Jewish sources when they were agreeing with you, obviously.

    And you're a ? .

    You of all people shouldn't be making this claim.

    It's not a question if I believe it. It doesn't answer the question of who inhabited that land, first. Even the time marker they give does not coincide with the "origin" of the "Jews" I just threw that in there to mess with you. When I presented the African Origin of the Chinese, I presented the link to the actual scientific study. I know that Jews did originate there. Just not the majority of the ones claiming it. Besides you claim to be atheist yet you hold on to Biblical notions of Jewish Lineage and heritage. Yet claim your not a Jew anymore. Something ain't right.

    I have no preconceived notions. For instance I used to think you were a miserable, North East ? who didn't have a social life and hated himself therefore he projected that on to others by perusing 5 websites all day and night spewing sour grapes at everyone because of your unhappy lot in life. I don't believe that anymore. I know it's only 4 sites.

    I learned not to judge...............
  • the_apprentice
    the_apprentice Members Posts: 156
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Rosenberg and Silverstein on Sanchez
    By Ron Kampeas · October 2, 2010
    Two different perspectives on the Rick Sanchez "Jews control the media" debacle, from the Jewish left.

    MJ Rosenberg, at the Huffington Post, calls for context:

    I feel bad for Sanchez because his attack on [Jon] Stewart and Jews was not the adult Sanchez talking but the hurt Latino immigrant child who has always felt (rightly or wrongly) that white America looked down on him.

    That is how it must have been for him at 6. And he still can't get over it.

    Richard Silverstein at Tikun Olam is reminded that "racism is an equal opportunity employer":

    Just because you’re a discriminated-against minority doesn’t mean that you too can’t be racist.

    Paul Campos, at Lawyers, Guns and Money notes he and Sanchez have similar upbringings -- and takes the ex-CNN anchor to the woodshed:

    It’s unfortunate that a CNN pooh bah once said something tactless to you, but if that’s your best example of what sort of things you’ve had to overcome as a “minority” in America, then I suggest you might ask yourself why your last name is still Sanchez while Jon Stuart Leibowitz’s is now Stewart.
  • the_apprentice
    the_apprentice Members Posts: 156
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Rosenberg and Silverstein on Sanchez
    By Ron Kampeas · October 2, 2010
    Two different perspectives on the Rick Sanchez "Jews control the media" debacle, from the Jewish left.

    MJ Rosenberg, at the Huffington Post, calls for context:

    I feel bad for Sanchez because his attack on [Jon] Stewart and Jews was not the adult Sanchez talking but the hurt Latino immigrant child who has always felt (rightly or wrongly) that white America looked down on him.

    That is how it must have been for him at 6. And he still can't get over it.

    Richard Silverstein at Tikun Olam is reminded that "racism is an equal opportunity employer":

    Just because you’re a discriminated-against minority doesn’t mean that you too can’t be racist.

    Paul Campos, at Lawyers, Guns and Money notes he and Sanchez have similar upbringings -- and takes the ex-CNN anchor to the woodshed:

    It’s unfortunate that a CNN pooh bah once said something tactless to you, but if that’s your best example of what sort of things you’ve had to overcome as a “minority” in America, then I suggest you might ask yourself why your last name is still Sanchez while Jon Stuart Leibowitz’s is now Stewart.

    And they dropped that ether right back..
  • sonofliberty
    sonofliberty Members Posts: 501
    edited October 2010
    Options
    I always roll my eyes at this aspect of the Jews.

    You can't say a single word about them. Anything that sounds like it might be criticism and boom! backlash.

    Brando had been making the Jews money for decades and only said "yeah they run Hollywood and it's kind of ? they'll exploit perceptions of other races" and they had his ass whimpering up an apology asap.

    And how much different is that with black folks or any other group?? Let's be honest everybody is ? sensitive when they the one getting talked about. I mean I ? wit Sanchez but he put his foot in his mouth and got what was coming, same with Imus and whoever else got too comfortable while on air.
  • Knives Amilli
    Knives Amilli Members Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    And how much different is that with black folks or any other group?? Let's be honest everybody is ? sensitive when they the one getting talked about. I mean I ? wit Sanchez but he put his foot in his mouth and got what was coming, same with Imus and whoever else got too comfortable while on air.

    Thing is with the jews is..you can't mention anything about them period.

    How offensive is saying "the jews run media"? It's true and imo it can be said with no "sinister implications". In fact only morons would see it that way.

    Yet if you said that, you'd probably be labeled an Anti-Semite and would be blackballed completely.

    Don Imus made racial sensitive marks and got to keep his career out of it + somehow Hip Hop took the blame for it. Hannity, Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck say racially ignorant ? all the time and are heroes to the GOP and the Tea Party.

    Its not the same.
  • anthony7q
    anthony7q Members Posts: 782
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Just because you’re a discriminated-against minority doesn’t mean that you too can’t be racist.

    Ditto...
  • haute
    haute Members Posts: 11,581 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    lol only thing that ? ethered was his employment status.

    ...........................
  • Miami6
    Miami6 Confirm Email Posts: 1,290
    edited October 2010
    Options
    i will miss his show.....it was great.................
  • northside7
    northside7 Members Posts: 25,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    usmarin3 wrote: »
    Cofucking sign, i've seen those mfs use code words for Obama and other black politicians and figure heads, yet nothing happen. You got ? insinuating Obama and his family are spear chuckers and nothing happen, say one ? damn thing about a jew and the ? get canned. I don't want to hear that ? about them being powerless!

    Pretty much.
  • politicalthug202
    politicalthug202 Members Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    Thing is with the jews is..you can't mention anything about them period.

    How offensive is saying "the jews run media"? It's true and imo it can be said with no "sinister implications". In fact only morons would see it that way.

    Yet if you said that, you'd probably be labeled an Anti-Semite and would be blackballed completely.

    Don Imus made racial sensitive marks and got to keep his career out of it + somehow Hip Hop took the blame for it. Hannity, Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck say racially ignorant ? all the time and are heroes to the GOP and the Tea Party.

    Its not the same.

    wrong hannity and Beck have accused the president unfairly of being a racist.They have not taken shots at blk ppl
    Oh and Rush Limbaugh got fired from ESPN and was not allowed to buy a football team,because he said some racially in sensitive remarks
    about donnovan Mcnabb. There are consequences for saying things about blk ppl.

    Dog was kicked off his show had to go cry on Larry King to get it back on the air
  • Copper
    Copper Members Posts: 49,532 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    lol only thing that ? ethered was his employment status.

    .....word!!!
  • KTULU IS BACK
    KTULU IS BACK Banned Users Posts: 6,617 ✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    if jews run the media, why did Jon Stewart have to change his real last name before he could get on TV?

    (Leibowitz)
  • Copper
    Copper Members Posts: 49,532 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2010
    Options
    kai_valya wrote: »
    i'm not even gonna get into the whole jew thing. i just want to know when jon stewart ever said anything bigoted? he's a bigot, but the anchors @ fox news aren't?

    nope ...theyre real americans fighting for liberty