Would you have more respect for Christians if...
Options
soul rattler
Members Posts: 18,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
they would just admit that:
- they find loopholes in their scriptures to justify their murder, lies, etc.
- they take SOME of the Bible seriously SOME of the time, but others not at all
- they may be worshipping a figment of their imagination but it helps them get through the day
- they use a book that has been tampered with throughout history and is mistranslated and inaccurate
- their religion is a religion, and thus inherits the traits of religions i.e. seperatism, xenophobia, genocide, enslavement, racism, sexism
- their religion responsible (at least partially) for a sizable portion of tragedies that have occured in the last 1500+ years
- if Jesus did exist in the first place, he is not the founder of Christianity
- they prefer 'faith' over 'logic' when it's most convenient
??? If you're going to participate in '? up' activities, at least be 100% and own up to it.
- they find loopholes in their scriptures to justify their murder, lies, etc.
- they take SOME of the Bible seriously SOME of the time, but others not at all
- they may be worshipping a figment of their imagination but it helps them get through the day
- they use a book that has been tampered with throughout history and is mistranslated and inaccurate
- their religion is a religion, and thus inherits the traits of religions i.e. seperatism, xenophobia, genocide, enslavement, racism, sexism
- their religion responsible (at least partially) for a sizable portion of tragedies that have occured in the last 1500+ years
- if Jesus did exist in the first place, he is not the founder of Christianity
- they prefer 'faith' over 'logic' when it's most convenient
??? If you're going to participate in '? up' activities, at least be 100% and own up to it.
Comments
-
Arbitrarily 'liberalizing' certain parts of the bible when convenient has always irritated me but I'd rather they be logically inconsistent if it means not discriminating against ? , not stoning women to death for being ? or committing adultery, not using psychological coercion (fear of hell) to indoctrinate children and win converts etc.
-
Arbitrarily 'liberalizing' certain parts of the bible when convenient has always irritated me but I'd rather they be logically inconsistent if it means not discriminating against ? , not stoning women to death for being ? or committing adultery, not using psychological coercion (fear of hell) to indoctrinate children and win converts etc.
Christianity seems to be one of those things that you can never follow completely without contradiction. -
No .
-
yes, but I would respect them more if they accepted all other religions.
-
Nope.....
The only time I actually have any respect for a religious man is when he follows what his book teaches. I respect and give more props to religious extremist that are out there killing people because they are told to rather than someone that says "oh well that dont matter no more". I think all religious people should start slaughtering people for the reasons they should. I'll start by claiming that Janklow is evil, one more claim that Janklow is evil means one of you Christians need to go find and murder him, Thank you. -
ThaChozenWun wrote: »Nope.....
The only time I actually have any respect for a religious man is when he follows what his book teaches. I respect and give more props to religious extremist that are out there killing people because they are told to rather than someone that says "oh well that dont matter no more". I think all religious people should start slaughtering people for the reasons they should. I'll start by claiming that Janklow is evil, one more claim that Janklow is evil means one of you Christians need to go find and murder him, Thank you.
But with Christians, they will read something in the bible, ignore it, and then claim that they didn't ignore it. If they would at least say, "Yes, the bible says that... but ? it I like that part." they would at least be upfront about their inconsistency. Instead, they just give the age old copout: "? knows my heart". -
soul rattler wrote: »But with Christians, they will read something in the bible, ignore it, and then claim that they didn't ignore it. If they would at least say, "Yes, the bible says that... but ? it I like that part." they would at least be upfront about their inconsistency. Instead, they just give the age old copout: "? knows my heart".
Why should I respect someone who believes a lie simply because they like it? -
It's not the person I have lack of regard for, it's the thought system.
-
soul rattler wrote: »- they find loopholes in their scriptures to justify their murder, lies, etc.
- they take SOME of the Bible seriously SOME of the time, but others not at all
- they may be worshipping a figment of their imagination but it helps them get through the day
- they use a book that has been tampered with throughout history and is mistranslated and inaccurate
- their religion is a religion, and thus inherits the traits of religions i.e. seperatism, xenophobia, genocide, enslavement, racism, sexism
- their religion responsible (at least partially) for a sizable portion of tragedies that have occured in the last 1500+ years
- if Jesus did exist in the first place, he is not the founder of Christianity
- they prefer 'faith' over 'logic' when it's most convenientThaChozenWun wrote: »I think all religious people should start slaughtering people for the reasons they should. I'll start by claiming that Janklow is evil, one more claim that Janklow is evil means one of you Christians need to go find and murder him, Thank you. -
some of this is acknowledged by Christians and some of it clearly cannot be acknowledged by Christians. you'd respect them if they said they're worshiping a figment of their imagination? come on
what the hell is going on here
I'll never forgive your rig voting Janklow. You putting Shootem in negative categories resulted in fixed poster of the year votes which in turn may have cost me the coveted POY crown... I got e-bread on your head. -
i would respect christians if they had any evidence of the outlandish things they speak whatsoever
-
some of this is acknowledged by Christians and some of it clearly cannot be acknowledged by Christians. you'd respect them if they said they're worshiping a figment of their imagination?
-
soul rattler wrote: »No, not that so much... just to come to terms with the fact that their deity doesn't actually exist. Like someone whose a fan of professional wrestling, they can love every minute of it and still admit that it isn't real. That's the least they could do.
lol
i know for a fact that wrestling is real
how else do you explain the five million cheering fans in the Pontiac Superdome when Hogan slammed Andre, brother? -
if jesus can die and come back to life, so can the Undertaker
-
soul rattler wrote: »........- if Jesus did exist in the first place, he is not the founder of Christianity ...........
Right ! Jesus is not the founder of what you [and most people] call "Christianity."
Roman Empire king Constantine was. -
KTULU IS BACK wrote: »lol
i know for a fact that wrestling is real
how else do you explain the five million cheering fans in the Pontiac Superdome when Hogan slammed Andre, brother?
hogan had a bad back at the time an he even admits it was staged and andre helped him with the slam.its in his book -
thedesolateone wrote: »hogan had a bad back at the time an he even admits it was staged and andre helped him with the slam.its in his book
time for a book burnin' then -
thedesolateone wrote: »hogan had a bad back at the time an he even admits it was staged and andre helped him with the slam.its in his book
All praise be to the Gawd Triple H. -
KTULU IS BACK wrote: »lol
i know for a fact that wrestling is real
how else do you explain the five million cheering fans in the Pontiac Superdome when Hogan slammed Andre, brother?
Are you joking? -
I already respect christians. I was raised by a ? Christian and I love my pops very much. Most of my family are Christians. My girl is the daughter of the pastor of the church I attended in my youth. I just happen to not believe what they believe.
I know that's shocking considering the word around the IC streets is that atheists are amoral and don't about anyone but themselves. -
ThaChozenWun wrote: »I'll never forgive your rig voting Janklow. You putting Shootem in negative categories resulted in fixed poster of the year votes which in turn may have cost me the coveted POY crown... I got e-bread on your head.soul rattler wrote: »No, not that so much... just to come to terms with the fact that their deity doesn't actually exist. Like someone whose a fan of professional wrestling, they can love every minute of it and still admit that it isn't real. That's the least they could do.
-
You live and you die. No religion or science has figured out anything different so while I respect them as human beings there is nothing they can do to make me respect them more other than figure out something different other than you live and you die.Lastly,the bible is interesting but it does not even stand the test of time as a moral compass.
-
thedesolateone wrote: »i would respect christians if they had any evidence of the outlandish things they speak whatsoever
slept on most rationalist of post