B*tches With Kids Are Damaged Goods
Options
Rozetta5tone
Members Posts: 4,506 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
-
We know no argument here
-
Mentally more than physically. The ? is still VERY good. Trust me. I see this. I do this.
-
-
True.........
-
DaFifthElement wrote: »Mentally more than physically. The ? is still VERY good. Trust me. I see this. I do this.
i respectfully disagree with your post.
i dont want ? that was once a studio apartment that belonged to a fetus -
DaFifthElement wrote: »Mentally more than physically. The ? is still VERY good. Trust me. I see this. I do this.
Yea the issue with that is that she FERTILE you even poke her back its a 50 % chance she gettin pregnant -
Iono maaaan, I dealt with ? with no kids that were damaged goods. Usually far worst than the ones with kids.
-
Yea the issue with that is that she FERTILE you even poke her back its a 50 % chance she gettin pregnant
Are there no more condoms? the ? just snaps back better to me... -
im tryin to give them hoes the benefit of the doubt but its just too many of them out here....i cant help but get aggravated when a ? younger than me got more kids than my mama and my auntie put together
-
of course they are,they let so many dudes run through them and after the kids are born she wanna do right but it's too late for her to find someone to be with her she just a walk bed mattress
-
texasboi409 wrote: »i cant help but get aggravated when a ? younger than me got more kids than my mama and my auntie put together
lmao
truth.com -
SMH @ this shock thread
maybe the ? chicks you deal with t/s LOL -
blakfyahking wrote: »SMH @ this shock thread
maybe the ? chicks you deal with t/s LOL
cool story bro -
-
For the most part yeah...but I will still ? them
-
only when she young
-
Rocket Kidd wrote: »only when she young
the older ones are even worse bcuz they know how to hide the baggage -
T/S can't be taken serious wasn't he the same guy who wifed a female who let him smash on the first date? smh
-
unfactual
psa -
one_manshow wrote: »T/S can't be taken serious wasn't he the same guy who wifed a female who let him smash on the first date? smh
smh exposed -
one_manshow wrote: »T/S can't be taken serious wasn't he the same guy who wifed a female who let him smash on the first date? smh
lol really?
yeah i wifed her but what i left out is the fact i knew her for 6 months prior and we used to kick it as friends before i ? .
Like i said in the same thread.......I sit on the park bench and feed the pigeons bread crumbs and watch em go nuts
LMAO -
one_manshow wrote: »T/S can't be taken serious wasn't he the same guy who wifed a female who let him smash on the first date? smh
oh ? I'm not the only one who sees the inconsistency
SMH @ wifing the first day like the ? made you fall in love LOL -
one_manshow wrote: »T/S can't be taken serious wasn't he the same guy who wifed a female who let him smash on the first date? smh
*leaves thread never to return* -
hannibal_187 wrote: »lol really?
yeah i wifed her but what i left out is the fact i knew her for 6 months prior and we used to kick it as friends before i ? .
Like i said in the same thread.......I sit on the park bench and feed the pigeons bread crumbs and watch em go nuts
LMAO
I ain't throwing shots but I thought it was man code to not wife jumpoffs...I guess some people got the equation all mixed up and making up their own variables.
No need to use rebuttals you were clearly having argument with two other posters justifying it but you wanna make a thread bashing women with kids? Lets keep it real son -
one_manshow wrote: »I ain't throwing shots but I thought it was man code to not wife jumpoffs...I guess some people got the equation all mixed up and making up their own variables.
No need to use rebuttals you were clearly having argument with two other posters justifying it but you wanna make a thread bashing women with kids? Lets keep it real son
those posters are ? and i felt like talking ?
one was tryin to treat me but he proudly calls himself a simp and the other is just lame as hell
i wasnt arguing i just made posts and they automatically assumed i was catching feelings but why would i catch feelings when i know this is a forum and anything and everything will/can be scrutinized.
i'm a troll. that's what i do
she wasnt a jumpoff she was my ? but i painted a picture making it seem like i was a sucka and she was a bussdown
This discussion has been closed.