The OFFICIAL FALL/WINTER WARDROBE THREAD

<Trillmatic> wrote: »

so is the purpose of wearing polo to show that you spend more money on a shirt than others, or is it just that you guys like to have a lil cute horsey on ya shirt? i really don't understand the big deal with Polo shirts. school me.

Can't speak for everyone but I like polo as a brand. Its nowhere near the top like some make it to be but it offers good clothing. I have a lot of polo shirts without the horse being present. A few of them cost more than the average polo shirt with the horse. But yes you will find a lot of brainwashed dudes that will skip over a better quality polo shirt without the horse logo for a cheaper one with the horse just to show others they are wearing the brand.just like some dudes was against wearing decks or canvas shoes but soon as they saw everybody in some plain decks/canvas shoes with a horse they had to have it and flaunt like its big ? . I also have a coat that you wouldn't know is polo unless you looked inside at the tag. Just looks like a regular plain coat but I like the fit,color and look.

? back wrote: »

Yo, CapB..., I love those Louboutin, son. Really do

i see u my ? ..
keep the website bookmarked and refresh that mu'? every 5 or so days.. thats bout the only way u go gett'em..
if u aint in Cali.. NY.. or Vegas ? 's damn near impossible..

where do u stay at??

? back wrote: »

Boston. Ill keep checking the site.. If u don't mind, how much u spent on em?

$750.......

CapitalB wrote: »

me with Polo.. for one its an esteemed brand.. i have baby pics with me in Polo and my nephew jus turned one and he got pics in Polo.. ? 's timeless.. i got shirts iv had for over 5 yrs that i can still rock.. what other brand y'know can say that?? ? 's like Levi's.. they dont get old..

and im not the trendy type.. that and i dont like my fits to call for too much attention... Polo is on some subtle ? .. but anyone with some class and culture go know u on ur ? ..

and yeh.. Polo costs more.. but because u can wear it for years.. its actually a smarter buy then say a black label or whatevers the current brand shirt that rivals it in price but u cant wear next season.. its not rocket science as to why one would ? with Polo so tuff...

gon have to give this one a big co-sign


if you gon drop monthly car note and house mortgage money on clothes,

may as well have it be a "respectable" brand with timeless style

PUPU_IZ_DRO wrote: »

i like polo just cause i like polo.. But if ima wear a polo its gone have a horse on it...

And i dont buy polo unless its on sale.. I aint bout to pay no 78$ for a shirt when i can go 2 the outlet and get 2 shirts for the same price

ok fair enough i understand your logic about on sale vs retail.

PUPU_IZ_DRO wrote: »

i just got the belt cause it matched the ribbon on the shoe.. But i dont tuck the shirt in so you cant even see the belt

i was almost certain you werent gonna tuck the belt in but it would even it out imo when the belt is actually in view.

chilly wrote: »

Can't speak for everyone but I like polo as a brand. Its nowhere near the top like some make it to be but it offers good clothing. I have a lot of polo shirts without the horse being present. A few of them cost more than the average polo shirt with the horse. But yes you will find a lot of brainwashed dudes that will skip over a better quality polo shirt without the horse logo for a cheaper one with the horse just to show others they are wearing the brand.just like some dudes was against wearing decks or canvas shoes but soon as they saw everybody in some plain decks/canvas shoes with a horse they had to have it and flaunt like its big ? . I also have a coat that you wouldn't know is polo unless you looked inside at the tag. Just looks like a regular plain coat but I like the fit,color and look.

cool i def feel what you are saying.

CapitalB wrote: »

me with Polo.. for one its an esteemed brand.. i have baby pics with me in Polo and my nephew jus turned one and he got pics in Polo.. ? 's timeless.. i got shirts iv had for over 5 yrs that i can still rock.. what other brand y'know can say that?? ? 's like Levi's.. they dont get old..

and im not the trendy type.. that and i dont like my fits to call for too much attention... Polo is on some subtle ? .. but anyone with some class and culture go know u on ur ? ..

and yeh.. Polo costs more.. but because u can wear it for years.. its actually a smarter buy then say a black label or whatevers the current brand shirt that rivals it in price but u cant wear next season.. its not rocket science as to why one would ? with Polo so tuff...

i understand its an esteemed brand and i def agree about it being a better investment in the long run. I wasn't implying it was rocket science lol but it seems alot of people mess with certain things for the wrong reasons and start tellin other ? how much more polo they got than the next ? like they some broads talking bout heels lol..thats all im sayin. but i def see your perspective on it.

CapitalB wrote: »

hahahaha what u tryin to say ? ??! lol

lol

nah no slick talk,

just sayin if cats gon drop major bread on clothes
make if worth while,
not off brands that fade colors after a few washes

or trendy fads that play out in a year or 2

a.mann wrote: »

lol

nah no slick talk,

just sayin if cats gon drop major bread on clothes
make if worth while,
not off brands that fade colors after a few washes

or trendy fads that play out in a year or 2

oh aiight.. can never be too sure w/ yo ass! hahahaha

............