SPINOFF: Why Is ? Frowned Upon?
Options
Comments
-
People in here acting like its just our society that is repulsed by ? , when its actually a universal taboo in every culture since the dawn of man.
-
? was oft present in many a royal lineage; ancient and not-so-ancient.
-
it ? up the gene diversity
-
Because people are secretly into ? .joseph sun wrote:why is this thread, and would you have sex with a cousin a regular staple on the IC?
I'm openly supportive of ? , so I don't make threads about it. -
damobb2deep wrote:id ? a stripper wit aids, raw dawg b4 id ? a family member....
sounds like spinoff thread to me -
Definitions of ? however, are not the same in every culture. Just go down south, they ? first cousins down there. -
freehuey89 wrote:damobb2deep wrote:id ? a stripper wit aids, raw dawg b4 id ? a family member....
sounds like spinoff thread to me
u can make it if u want.... i aint... smh -
Plap Sun wrote:Will Munny wrote:Definitions of ? however, are not the same in every culture. Just go down south, they ? first cousins down there.
only in the white trailer trash community
And educated person would say royalty in Japan or ancient greece... but that really ain't you now is it.
-
Will Munny wrote:Plap Sun wrote:Will Munny wrote:Definitions of ? however, are not the same in every culture. Just go down south, they ? first cousins down there.
only in the white trailer trash community
And educated person would say royalty in Japan or ancient greece... but that really ain't you now is it.
muthfuckas did alot of ? in the past that later turned out 2 be ? up... so who gives a ? who did it and why its still nasty... -
damobb2deep wrote:Will Munny wrote:Plap Sun wrote:Will Munny wrote:Definitions of ? however, are not the same in every culture. Just go down south, they ? first cousins down there.
only in the white trailer trash community
And educated person would say royalty in Japan or ancient greece... but that really ain't you now is it.
muthfuckas did alot of ? in the past that later turned out 2 be ? up... so who gives a ? who did it and why its still nasty...
Did I ever say it wasn't nasty? -
Will Munny wrote:damobb2deep wrote:Will Munny wrote:Plap Sun wrote:Will Munny wrote:Definitions of ? however, are not the same in every culture. Just go down south, they ? first cousins down there.
only in the white trailer trash community
And educated person would say royalty in Japan or ancient greece... but that really ain't you now is it.
muthfuckas did alot of ? in the past that later turned out 2 be ? up... so who gives a ? who did it and why its still nasty...
Did I ever say it wasn't nasty?
lol no im jus sayin... -
Exhibit A You nasty ass cousin ?
-
Wouldn't this have happened somewhere along the lines of ou evolution to get a stable population growth?
-
PublicEnemigo1 wrote:Exhibit A You nasty ass cousin ?
i guess people want they kids 2 look like
smh.....
-
? proves that the offspring will eventually be sterile, so doesnt that disprove the whole Adam and Eve theory?
-
? want their kids eyeballs to be touching and ? ...
Do better ? ,,,some ? is off limits, just deal with it.... -
? is fine as long as the family doesn't have any genetic disorders in the family.
Also helps if the family doesn't have any extremely undesirable traits. -
lol @capitalc and c/s only ? that got serious problems and get no ? at all will think about ? fam...
-
CapitalC wrote:? want their kids eyeballs to be touching and ? ...
Do better ? ,,,some ? is off limits, just deal with it....
Exactly...smh @ these depraved muthafuckas. -
Cause that ? 's the ultimate disgusting
-
nasty ass ? up in here wanna ? their sisters, cousins, and aunt's and ? trying to find justification for the ? .
-
I had to do a report back in High School about consensual ? . There are several support forums online where people go to share their experiences on dating family members. ? 's disgusting.
-
Just because no genetic disorders are observed doesn't mean they aren't carried.
-
This thread man.. I learning a little bit too much about some of you all. ? son. Some of you all's depravity knows no bounds.
-
Wouldn't this have happened somewhere along the lines of ou evolution to get a stable population growth?
scientists don't actually really know why all human cultures treat ? (between siblings) as taboo. they used to say that it might have evolved because inbreeding causes reduced virility but that has never been proven without question.
so the truth is we don't know.
is it wrong? yes. that's how everybody has been socially programmed.
why did our ancestors decide it was wrong?
your guess is as good as mine
