RGIII > Mike Vick.... Yes or No???
Options
Comments
-
one thing is certain........romo>>>>>>>>>>>>>vick
-
bankrupt baller wrote: »one thing is certain........romo>>>>>>>>>>>>>vick
negative -
bankrupt baller wrote: »one thing is certain........romo>>>>>>>>>>>>>vick
negative
positive -
A fluke? why because of what happened this year? you a hater lol. you need more than one year of observation breh. if Vick plays horrible for the next 2 or 3 years, then you got a point.
IT was a ? fluke...you clearly dont know jack ? about football. Vick was nothing more than an Avg QB in ATL...the numbers he put up in 2010 was his best season of his entire football career. -
-
Hell ya Romo is better and it's not even close. Vick has 2 post-season wins to Romo's 1. People exaggerate the difference like it's some Brady v Manning ? . Only reason people think Vick is up there with Romo is because everyone still looks at Vick like he's a young guy coming outta college, and wanna talk about potential. Like Maalik earlier saying wait another 2-3 years to determine if that was a fluke season for Vick.
Who else you know in football that's over 30 and people talkin about let's give him another few years to see what type of player he really is? That's the same thing people are sayin about RG III and rookies, haha. -
bow to royalty wrote: »Hell ya Romo is better and it's not even close. Vick has 2 post-season wins to Romo's 1. People exaggerate the difference like it's some Brady v Manning ? . Only reason people think Vick is up there with Romo is because everyone still looks at Vick like he's a young guy coming outta college, and wanna talk about potential. Like Maalik earlier saying wait another 2-3 years to determine if that was a fluke season for Vick.
Who else you know in football that's over 30 and people talkin about let's give him another few years to see what type of player he really is? That's the same thing people are sayin about RG III and rookies, haha.
romos numbers destroy vicks......then when you bring up stats people act as if some how they dont matter.....how else do you judge an individual in a sport with 22 starters? both havent won ? so stats is all there is to go by -
Mike Vick is a slightly better version of Marcus Vick
-
KINGOFDAARCADE wrote: »Mike Vick is a slightly better version of Marcus Vick
ether -
icecoldstew wrote: »Glad I missed this thread post..
.................... -
You say the word Vick and a mountain of feelings tumbles down the Cheap Seats lmao.
-
VIck is a better runner. RG3 is a better passer at this point.
-
Meet The Sniper wrote: »You say the word Vick and a mountain of feelings tumbles down the Cheap Seats lmao.
especially in the romo>>>>>vick thread from last year.......somebody bump that ?
-
bankrupt baller wrote: »Meet The Sniper wrote: »You say the word Vick and a mountain of feelings tumbles down the Cheap Seats lmao.
especially in the romo>>>>>vick thread from last year.......somebody bump that ?
That thread was hilarious when people tried defendin Vick. Romo had dude beat in like every category. Call that ? Player X vs Player Y and there would be NO contest. But when it's Romo vs Vick people act like they don't know. -
bow to royalty wrote: »bankrupt baller wrote: »Meet The Sniper wrote: »You say the word Vick and a mountain of feelings tumbles down the Cheap Seats lmao.
especially in the romo>>>>>vick thread from last year.......somebody bump that ?
That thread was hilarious when people tried defendin Vick. Romo had dude beat in like every category. Call that ? Player X vs Player Y and there would be NO contest. But when it's Romo vs Vick people act like they don't know.
meet the sniper was one of those people going hard for vick.....lol thats why i said bump it up.
feelings come up when vick is brought up.....but its from vick fans
romo>>>>>>>>vick -
Vick and Romo both extremely talented. Vick is injury prone and Romo doesn't have clutch genes like Lebron.
-
A fluke? why because of what happened this year? you a hater lol. you need more than one year of observation breh. if Vick plays horrible for the next 2 or 3 years, then you got a point.
IT was a ? fluke...you clearly dont know jack ? about football. Vick was nothing more than an Avg QB in ATL...the numbers he put up in 2010 was his best season of his entire football career.
i don't know ? about football....? all of you ? was on his ? last year. yall the fakest football fans on the internet.
In 2010, ? was saying he had a better than Brady. In 2012, he's not better than some college kid. FOH. -
A fluke? why because of what happened this year? you a hater lol. you need more than one year of observation breh. if Vick plays horrible for the next 2 or 3 years, then you got a point.
IT was a ? fluke...you clearly dont know jack ? about football. Vick was nothing more than an Avg QB in ATL...the numbers he put up in 2010 was his best season of his entire football career.
i don't know ? about football....? all of you ? was on his ? last year. yall the fakest football fans on the internet.
In 2010, ? was saying he had a better than Brady. In 2012, he's not better than some college kid. FOH.
U must got me confused with someone else....I have always said on this board that in 2010 was Vick greatest season ever close MVP level but aside from that one season he was nothing more than an AVG QB, if anything he reverted back to way of playing last season.
Brady>Vick now and forever... -
Vick and Romo both extremely talented. Vick is injury prone and Romo doesn't have clutch genes like Lebron.
romo is clutch....cowboys D not so much -
Vick elicit so many feelings
-
Vick elicit so many feelings
I think it's cuz of the huge difference in what people think of his talent level. Some people talk on here like they think dude's gonna be in the HOF one day -
-
bow to royalty wrote: »
its possible depending on how his career finishes out
hard 2 make a case right now but he robbed himself of 3-4 years -
-
major pain wrote: »
true....
