Who would u sign first, ? C or Bun B?
Options
HalfwayHandsome
Members Posts: 248
Imma go with ? C, but I think Bun was a better overall rapper.
Comments
-
Bun B cause he breathes.
-
? c bun b gets boring
-
bun b cuz ? c was wack
-
the ? ...
-
Bun B.
? C needed Bun's balance and it showed on his solo records. ? were laughable. -
? C. Bun B was the better rapper but was not as marketable as ? C would have been. Plus ? C was a producer so he could have been a double threat. ? C makes you more money and saves you money, so ? is the better sign.
-
the_omniscient wrote: »? C. Bun B was the better rapper but was not as marketable as ? C would have been. Plus ? C was a producer so he could have been a double threat. ? C makes you more money and saves you money, so ? is the better sign.
Co signed. U my friend have been repped. -
I personally would've gone with ? C, just because he has a more appealing voice, in my opinion. But as far as lyricism, I might say Bun is better. Plus Bun's solo albums were really better than ? 's. I don't know that that's a fair comparison though, since The Sweet James Jones Stories was put together while he was in jail, using old verses. And The Pimpilation was more of a compilation than a solo album. But it's really hard to choose. On some UGK songs I think ? C had the better verses and on other songs I think Bun outshines him.
-
business standpoint..? c
artistic standpoint.. bun b -
? C was creative and came up with most of the UGK concepts/ material. ? C
-
Being ? c is dead it would probably be a bad idea to sign him.. #canon
-
-
Bun B
-
I'm an industry plant and negotiate record spins for round about payment
-
FrankOceanIsGay wrote: »I'm an industry plant and negotiate record spins for round about payment
So it was industry knowledge?
and you do payola? How can a dude like me get into that line of work? -
? ... Bun sounds nice with ? but solo he always been just aiight...
-
In the 1980's i interned at american recordings. Every week i'd get a binder of radio station phone numbers and in turn would call and request some song i never heard. It wasnt limited to any particular genre. Now a days we just pay pal an anonymous contribution to the main stations and they spin whoever has an album dropping. Does matter how garbage the artist is
-
FrankOceanIsGay wrote: »In the 1980's i interned at american recordings. Every week i'd get a binder of radio station phone numbers and in turn would call and request some song i never heard. It wasnt limited to any particular genre. Now a days we just pay pal an anonymous contribution to the main stations and they spin whoever has an album dropping. Does matter how garbage the artist is
lol that job sounds easy as ?
You do realize you're a sell out, right? You should make a thread about it -
Neither wouldn't one without the other
-
-
? c
He sang on the hooks
Made beats
Played instruments
Bun b solos always have other artists on his hooks..he sounds awkward -
Yin and yang....they don't sound as good solo as they do together. ? was the brains and "swag" of the group and Bun was the rappin ass ? in the group. ? produced everything and sung on most of the hooks....bun just had to rap and he did that pretty well.....they compliment each other...
-
If i want a rapper ima get Bun but if i want to have some better marketing I will get ?
-
HalfwayHandsome wrote: »the_omniscient wrote: »? C. Bun B was the better rapper but was not as marketable as ? C would have been. Plus ? C was a producer so he could have been a double threat. ? C makes you more money and saves you money, so ? is the better sign.
Co signed. U my friend have been repped.
? was that producer who would hook you up if you had real ? to spit even if you were dead broke. He like E-40 where he helped local talent get play no matter how much buzz you got. Bun the better spitta but ? the ambassador to the trap.
-
? C
The trillest ever