Everyone with nudity in their sig is about to get banned. (TIMES UP)
Options
Comments
-
darkone360 wrote: »
ok she had to adjust fire...
big whoop..
standing straight up she just a fat ? .
Smh.
-
@theodis so what is the line ? . You mentioned both my sigs so I use myself as an example. The one with skn diamond and asa akira ,"embracing" didn't show any ? or ? so I thought it as ok. Sexually graphic but within the no nudity rule. So can you explain the line so that I can know how precariously close I may skirt the edge?
-
Disproportionate ? with implants.numbaz...80's baby wrote: »
But she might be fat as well. I can't tell from the pic. -
numbaz...80's baby wrote: »Those ILL PIX NAZIS were beasting at me when i came in their territory. Except @darkone and @allahuakbar i will not display neither symphathy nor aggressivity...
I ll just watch @theodis doing his WITH PRIDE AND EXCELLENCE!!!
Scrammmm!!!
You sound like a real ? right now. On here whining and ? . "They were mean to me."
Theodis......I ain't even mad. You was just doing your job or whatever. I never seen that warning but it's whatever.
1
I ll follow some modds tips and not respond.
Peace bruh its all love
-
darkone360 wrote: »
no cape but this aint een fat, thats just regular ole thick, if thats fat then theres a lot more obese people in mississippi then they think -
I've not seen a sig since 2010
-
-
-
-
So...that what it's like to be banned without no knowledge of a warning, huh?
-
He did warn u. Dont u read gis threads?Disciplined InSight wrote: »So...that what it's like to be banned without no knowledge of a warning, huh?
Oh Thats right...noone does
I tried to log in and couldn't. Then when I found out I was banned, I really had no knowledge about as to why I was banned and that's when I saw the thread but by that time it was too late. Trust me, if I did see it on time, I would have removed it ASAP.
I don't be on the IC 24/7...I take my days off this ? to handle business in the real world.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
Ghost Leopard wrote: »@theodis so what is the line ? . You mentioned both my sigs so I use myself as an example. The one with skn diamond and asa akira ,"embracing" didn't show any ? or ? so I thought it as ok. Sexually graphic but within the no nudity rule. So can you explain the line so that I can know how precariously close I may skirt the edge?
if the picture can get someone fired from work then it belongs in a spoiler.
i dont see how thats unreasonable.
yall still get to keep your competitions and we dont have ? clapping ? in threads about child rearing....
True. But be honest though..somebody was ? about it sooooooo much, you had no other choice but forced your ban hand right? -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
I wish female nudity could be legalized but for now ... Ugh
-
Disciplined InSight wrote: »Ghost Leopard wrote: »@theodis so what is the line ? . You mentioned both my sigs so I use myself as an example. The one with skn diamond and asa akira ,"embracing" didn't show any ? or ? so I thought it as ok. Sexually graphic but within the no nudity rule. So can you explain the line so that I can know how precariously close I may skirt the edge?
if the picture can get someone fired from work then it belongs in a spoiler.
i dont see how thats unreasonable.
yall still get to keep your competitions and we dont have ? clapping ? in threads about child rearing....
True. But be honest though..somebody was ? about it sooooooo much, you had no other choice but forced your ban hand right?
@icecoldstew
SMH...he's was that sensitive about it?! What a ? . -
lol A mod saying this is hilarious. -
I thought this problem was solved already by having the option of not showing sigs. If you're at work, click the ? hide sig option. smh
-
Disciplined InSight wrote: »Ghost Leopard wrote: »@theodis so what is the line ? . You mentioned both my sigs so I use myself as an example. The one with skn diamond and asa akira ,"embracing" didn't show any ? or ? so I thought it as ok. Sexually graphic but within the no nudity rule. So can you explain the line so that I can know how precariously close I may skirt the edge?
if the picture can get someone fired from work then it belongs in a spoiler.
i dont see how thats unreasonable.
yall still get to keep your competitions and we dont have ? clapping ? in threads about child rearing....
True. But be honest though..somebody was ? about it sooooooo much, you had no other choice but forced your ban hand right?
@icecoldstew
So basically stew got caught up or almost caught up and came to you to drop the hammer?
-
So basically Stew almost got fired or got fired due to the sigs and we had to pay the price, huh?
What a ? . -
Lol @ Jamel throwin Stew under the bus. Damn mod loyalty just went out the window.
-
lol @ that bs argument of it could get someone fired from work
i'm pretty sure them being on a forum at work is a terminable offense and if it isn't then those ? can either disable sigs or just not go on the forum while working -
contemplate wrote: »lol @ that bs argument of it could get someone fired from work
i'm pretty sure them being on a forum at work is a terminable offense and if it isn't then those ? can either disable sigs or just not go on the forum while working
Shots fired @ Kat.
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
This discussion has been closed.