Honest Question: Whats more Closed-Minded?
Options
Premeer
Members Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭✭✭
believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
Comments
-
believing only what's been given to you by the powers that be.
-
believing only what's been given to you by the powers that be.
believing in what you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see touch or feel?
-
Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath.Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath.Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither.
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath.Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither.
You can always ask a different question if you want a different answer. Just make sure it doesn't have the same flaw as the original question. -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath.Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither.
You can always ask a different question if you want a different answer. Just make sure it doesn't have the same flaw as the original question.
you like playing dumb..
we already went over what this is about... and why you wont answer the obvious question.. for verification, what forum room are we posting in.
next time, dont play so dumb just to over-complicate a simple obvious question just to try to keep from blowing up your whole belief system. -
Atheists all got something in common I see lmao
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither. As they are too vague to form an overall summary about how "open" or "closed" a person's mind is.
but you already know the answer to the question. ill keep that between me and you.
@gold_certificate
Depends on what's in the soup/sandwich, how often they are eaten, and the person's reason for eating them.
In fact, it'd be rather close-minded of me to make a presumption with such little information.
the question doesnt need details. it covers EVERYTHING.
but again, you are trying really hard at self-ethering your whole belief system. you already know what this is about.. its not a secret and you are not dumb. so you tip-toeing around here is funny.
I'm am not close-minded enough to presume I can make a determination regarding every possible scenario that fits the two premises you proposed.
we all know you are a atheist.. and we all know you wont answer the question logically cuz you wont ether yourself..
its not even logical to strictly believe only what you can see, touch, and feel.
your whole belief system lacks open-mindedness AND logic.
I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
dont be ridiculous. you cant see cells either with your naked eye.. cant see wifi either. so your ridiculousness is almost non-tolerable.
And WiFi is a type of radio wave; which I already said I believe in, despite being unable to see them.Gold_Certificate wrote: »...I can't "see, touch, and feel" radio waves, but I certainly believe they exist.
you believe wifi cuz you see with your own eyes the benefits of it.. so that example is null and void.
same as cells.. because you can see them with your eye.. 1 way or another...
which was the points that you clearly missed.
You're the one who brought up cells; I was just correcting your claim that they could not be seen with the naked eye, since it was not entirely true.believing something you cant see?
or ONLY believing what you can see, touch, and feel?
I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
Perhaps you should've been more specific if you were referring to something other than what you wrote.
perhaps, you should have answered the simple question with a simple answer.
you so smart that you became dumb in the same breath.Gold_Certificate wrote: »Neither.
You can always ask a different question if you want a different answer. Just make sure it doesn't have the same flaw as the original question.
you like playing dumb..
we already went over what this is about... and why you wont answer the obvious question.. for verification, what forum room are we posting in.
next time, dont play so dumb just to over-complicate a simple obvious question just to try to keep from blowing up your whole belief system.Gold_Certificate wrote: »I happen to believe in plenty of things that I can't "see, touch, and feel", despite being an atheist.
You may not have liked the answer, but it was an answer none-the-less. -
There's a saying: don't be so "open minded" that your brains fall out.
-
Both and neither are both logical
-