*f-cking dead* Amber Rose Organizing "? Walk" Protest To Combat ? -Shaming
Options
Comments
-
Is that so?
Ill go to this ? parade especially if they just handing it out.
Walk thru that parade and just pick out ? like MJ when he was buying ? .
She found her true calling. -
every time i think i cant be shocked no mo.
? like this happen. -
Nothing more annoying than an Attention ? ? -- just be a regular ? and do what you do. You're supposed to be grown, ? what someone else has to say.But I am thinking about making an appearance at a walk to do some recruiting
Perhaps one of these ? will allow me to suck their breast! -
? letting it be known they ? ? where will this be held
-
I wholly support hoes being themselves.
-
dalyricalbandit wrote: »? letting it be known they ? ? where will this be held
Exactly this is beautiful.
Amber Rose should be ruler of her own island of Slutsadonia. She gets my vote
-
Wait wait wait.....didn't she insult kimk for taking it in the face though?
-
Maybe she should go take care of her son instead of ? walking
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »
I still can't believe Batman is a ? ? . -
I don't understand this ? . What is wrong with ? shaming? If you are a ? , you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.
-
Ok, not one of yall done asked the most important question..
When and where is this ? walk?
N who trying to make the trip n smash these ? ?
Tell me which one of yall wouldn't smash Amber arose if she was butt ass naked on your keyboard. So when, where, and who going to swoop? -
...? Walk?...That ? gonna' turn into Freaknik...
-
Another pride parade. Damn everybody wants one.
-
Breezy_Kilroy wrote: »dalyricalbandit wrote: »? letting it be known they ? ? where will this be held
Exactly this is beautiful.
Amber Rose should be ruler of her own island of Slutsadonia. She gets my vote
Lol can't believe Wiz trying to wife that. He knew what would happen. -
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
? can walk down my street any day.
-
The Lonious Monk wrote: »I don't understand this ? . What is wrong with ? shaming? If you are a ? , you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.
Define "? "...Cuz if we're just talking about women who have sex with a lotta partners, I don't see a problem. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »I don't understand this ? . What is wrong with ? shaming? If you are a ? , you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.
U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone
She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought
She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "? " or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?
-
The Million ? March...lace up them ? boots and make it happen for the Nation of Asslam, Amber.
-
Maybe she should go take care of her son instead of ? walking
Hey,hey,hey.That lil nigglet old enough to be left in the house alone for a few hours while his mama does the ? walk -
U gotta be kidding me! Lolol
-
-
desertrain10 wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »I don't understand this ? . What is wrong with ? shaming? If you are a ? , you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.
U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone
She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought
She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "? " or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?
Simply expressing and exploring sexuality does not make a chick a ? . Only the most conservative and prudish people claim that. ? whoever whenever with little to no discrimination makes a chick a ? and that's not good or healthy for anyone.
I don't know if she's a ? or thot or not, but she's embracing it. If she wasn't a ? , you'd think she'd make the argument that she's not, denounce actual sluttery, and stick up for what she actually considers herself to be. But again, she is embracing that term, so there it is.
-
Batman should get his name changed and lay low for a while
-
The Lonious Monk wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »I don't understand this ? . What is wrong with ? shaming? If you are a ? , you should be ashamed. People seem to think they have to be applauded for everything they do.
U have ur opinion, but I just don't see how discouraging women from expressing themselves and exploring their sexuality is healthy for anyone
She could be just doing this to market herself and her book ... But I like the thought
She does raise some interesting questions. Why is she, Amber Rose, the woman both of whom had serious relationships with, now this "? " or "thot" according to Wiz, Ye ... Is it because she has sexual agency and chooses not let the men in her life govern her actions?
Simply expressing and exploring sexuality does not make a chick a ? . Only the most conservative and prudish people claim that. ? whoever whenever with little to no discrimination makes a chick a ? and that's not good or healthy for anyone.
I don't know if she's a ? or thot or not, but she's embracing it. If she wasn't a ? , you'd think she'd make the argument that she's not, denounce actual sluttery, and stick up for what she actually considers herself to be. But again, she is embracing that term, so there it is.
Once again we gotta define ? and to take it further., you do know that term was invented to shame women from exploring their sexuality and also police their behavior? The term "? " has no merit in reality/