Tea Time with Chico :) (ALL HELL DONE BROKE LOOSE)
Options
Comments
-
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »ELITE_POSTER wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Ok u dudes bout to squab over Six?
What's popping @ELITE_POSTER u good?
lol @ fighting over Six. Damn shame she ended up being the IC ? she always proclaimed kat to be. All of this would have been avoided if she had simply given to me what was owed.
I'm good, had no idea there was a ? on the IC with hate in his heart for the realest ? on the IC. If he really want beef then we can both pull burners and let the muthafuccin beef cook....wait I used that line before...still fits cause ? would end the same way it did the previous time I used it.
the irony of this does not go unnoticed....seemed like she threw the drawers at 78.9% of the IC males
I woulda hit, but I wouldn't fly 5K miles to do so. Cracca really flew across 2 of the top 5 largest countries in the world for some trim. ? must be scarce in Alaska.
another irony is that there is nothing but ? in Alaska...women out number men....state full of freaks nh -
Whoa
-
-
Yep..say it to my MFn face though!The Iconoclast wrote: »
So Cain, Icon"oclast, Lurk and Tony Dubbz live near Six yet a white ? was able to come in you weak ? state and pull her. Damn NC lost and maybe the SC posters were right SC> NC I guess. ? I bet even PR and Matt if they wanted couldve smashed. Six was choosing and u ? didnt get chosed
about 5 hours ago
Answer
I was going to ignore this cowardly anonymous post but I'll respond just to debunk an IC myth once and for all.1. Lol @ the notion that the standard of comparison between two neighboring states is one state's ability to keep a random citizen from befriending or having sex with a person from another state.
2. However with that said, if we actually use that logic...then the state of NC still didn't take a L.
Since to keep it 100, @SixSickSins actually 'chose' me. Nonetheless, she finally became attached to the idea of Lou flying down to NC and meeting her when she became annoyed with waiting on me (among other things after her unfortunate circumstance.)
Here's the backstory:
She initiated, by showing interest in me (merely as a poster and on a platonic level then) within months after I signed up on this site last year in after she begin reading my posts in the GnS/Social Lounge. After that, many months later she found out how I looked, she immediately wanted to talk to me offline about my relationship status (and info/personal details about my life) and wanted to meet up (movies/gun range then place to eat then my place or hers it didn't matter according to her, but she preferred my spot).
Eventually, she apparently grew tired of my laid-back, take-it-slow approach with her (one of the things she disliked about me was my natural aversion to meeting females off websites/forums I frequent and my preference for local females I've seen in person). I think she took it personal or thinks I led her on I guess, when it wasn't like that since I would've done the same to any female in that scenario - I met online/from social media. I'm type of guy that even if I joke around say things like I want to meet up or in her case say it and actually mean it, I'm going to take it slow and evaluate whether it's worth doing it.
Hopefully from her perspective I actually didn't come off as leading her on. However, I'll never be one of those cats that will attempt to bag an online female within a week of her reciprocating the interest regardless of the goofy simpish things I type to a female. I'm a chill, introvert irl so l'm fond of privacy and I'm skeptical of anything that can compromise my private info/career/offline associations and friendships (it's the reason I don't like exposures and would never expose a female or anyone for that matter.)
Lou's cool af, so out of respect for him and Six (who I still like immensely as a person) that's the last I'll say about this topic.
? in here writing long ass DarcGraphs & ? . Bottomline is you ? drove our Dear sister Amber into the arms of a Devil ass ? ? thus destroying the black community and making BoldChild look the damn fool.
Amber & all you ? set us black posters back 400 years Posts with this ? . The white man came to our servers to ? our black ? , molest our hoes & burn our threads down and u ? is letting them.
THIS.WILL.NOT -NAY!- THIS CAN.NOT.STAND! -
Almost forgot...
SHUT UP KAT -
note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
-
note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
And you might get your ? sucked by Charlie -
And another thing:
Give our Cracka Lou his props. That Cracka ? game SKrong...
Was she a fake militant? YES. But that cracka's a walking rap line. U know how ? used to over use the, "I'll make a Nun ? ...etc etc etc" or "I'll hav a good girl acting like a porn star" rap lines?
This cracka made a Full-Fledged Black Internet Militant his House ? Bed ? . Completely direpecting herself AND her multitude of black simps for some pink ? ...THAT SHE FLEW IN...LMAO!
She chose a ? a thousand miles away over ? thataws damn near across the street. LAAAAAME AS ? ! LMAO!!!!
That ? Lou left the hospital wit shades on and a fur coat wen he was born. I swear.note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
WILL -
note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
what u talking bout? Besides Charlie freaking out on Yunn, that Houston trip is still a mystery accented by a bunch of I know something u don't know inferences...u LL be fine yo -
Lightskin demon aint posted in a minute and she still got boys showin they ?
She still lurk hard dena ? tho
Nappyknots a g miss you i swear i do -
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »And another thing:
Give our Cracka Lou his props. That Cracka ? game SKrong...
Was she a fake militant? YES. But that cracka's a walking rap line. U know how ? used to over use the, "I'll make a Nun ? ...etc etc etc" or "I'll hav a good girl acting like a porn star" rap lines?
This cracka made a Full-Fledged Black Internet Militant his House ? Bed ? . Completely direpecting herself AND her multitude of black simps for some pink ? ...THAT SHE FLEW IN...LMAO!
She chose a ? a thousand miles away over ? thataws damn near across the street. LAAAAAME AS ? ! LMAO!!!!
That ? Lou left the hospital wit shades on and a fur coat wen he was born. I swear.note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
WILL
lol now this changes EVERYTHING
Thats not official sir. -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »note to self dont go to the IC meet up houston edition because your business might end up on the IC streets
what u talking bout? Besides Charlie freaking out on Yunn, that Houston trip is still a mystery accented by a bunch of I know something u don't know inferences...u LL be fine yo
with the recent events unfolded......? im considering skipping town lol -
and I never ? with Six she seemed fraud the whole time. And Lou always been a basehead ? to me
-
Can we stop taking about goofy ass white boys
-
So... this turned into a gossip girl thread? OK
-
from what Rubato posted, Six basically simped every ? mentioned in the Mr. Allhiphop thread...she was out here catcalling at my ? Rubato & Icono tf?!? So I guess she only like white boys and rnb drake ass pretty boys smh scust and this was yall favorite black militant. she hated real ?
about 7 hours ago
Answer
Pico's ban is hiding something that only certain ppl know behind the scenes. Its going to eventually get brought to light
about 9 hours ago
Scorpio vs Dark has the potential to turn into a more rage-filled verson of 5 and Westie
about 9 hours ago
Answer
So ypo mean to tell me every NC female poster ? a white IC poster: twinsmom and Six...damn is NC a state full of bedwenching ? ? ole smarty art militant ? Iconoclast could've broke this cycle but instead he out here duckin black ? like he owes it money
about 9 hours ago
Answer
Reesy, GotdamKam and Scorpio need to reveal all their simps and give us the current standings so we know which one is the leads. Simp updates are helpful and would be cutting edge technology to keep things like Six's and Marley situation where no one new the exact simp order, from happening again.
about 10 hours ago
Answer
Topoftheworld, do you miss Copper? Send my ? any new ? pics while he's been incarcerated?
about 10 hours ago
Answer
So we all gon act like we aint hear MsSouthern say the reason she banned Max last account because he a ? alias? You ? about to give this messican fruit stand ? a pass for ? ? ?
about 11 hours ago -
-
TheEyeronic1 wrote: »Recaptimus_Prime360 wrote: »@ is entertaining/funny as hell. Lol.
its ? HILARIOUS man.
theres all of 9 females who post here AND EVERYBODY and their mama is trying to shoot their shot like its a ? game 7 4th quarter buzzer beater.
and if thats your thing, more power to you but ? DAMN if it aint funny as ? .
Same ? I said last night on here.... -
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »The numbers game don't work with IC hoes, yo.
If there's 100 ? actively posting and 10 females actively posting it would appear there's a 1/10 chance for a ? to get some from an IC ? . This is false, of the 100 ? , half are gonna be lame and disqualified from the beginning. This now makes it 1/5 odds but still this number is overexaggerated. Now, out of those 50 ? , you're gonna have half these ? that ain't even thinkin about conversatin with some ? on a hip hop website. Now this brings us down to 2.5:1. This seems like it gives ? about a 40% chance if he shoots his shot, but even this isn't correct as we have to factor in the most important concept in this whole topic. IC hoes are some real hoes, these hoes ain't lookin for one man, they're on a hip hop website with a bunch of dumb ? , so they're not here for stimulating conversation and intellectual social intercourse....every ? on the IC is ready for at least 4 ? at any given time. So this means if you want an IC ? the odds are actually 1.6:1 in your favor.
hilarious -
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »The numbers game don't work with IC hoes, yo.
If there's 100 ? actively posting and 10 females actively posting it would appear there's a 1/10 chance for a ? to get some from an IC ? . This is false, of the 100 ? , half are gonna be lame and disqualified from the beginning. This now makes it 1/5 odds but still this number is overexaggerated. Now, out of those 50 ? , you're gonna have half these ? that ain't even thinkin about conversatin with some ? on a hip hop website. Now this brings us down to 2.5:1. This seems like it gives ? about a 40% chance if he shoots his shot, but even this isn't correct as we have to factor in the most important concept in this whole topic. IC hoes are some real hoes, these hoes ain't lookin for one man, they're on a hip hop website with a bunch of dumb ? , so they're not here for stimulating conversation and intellectual social intercourse....every ? on the IC is ready for at least 4 ? at any given time. So this means if you want an IC ? the odds are actually 1.6:1 in your favor.
-
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »The numbers game don't work with IC hoes, yo.
If there's 100 ? actively posting and 10 females actively posting it would appear there's a 1/10 chance for a ? to get some from an IC ? . This is false, of the 100 ? , half are gonna be lame and disqualified from the beginning. This now makes it 1/5 odds but still this number is overexaggerated. Now, out of those 50 ? , you're gonna have half these ? that ain't even thinkin about conversatin with some ? on a hip hop website. Now this brings us down to 2.5:1. This seems like it gives ? about a 40% chance if he shoots his shot, but even this isn't correct as we have to factor in the most important concept in this whole topic. IC hoes are some real hoes, these hoes ain't lookin for one man, they're on a hip hop website with a bunch of dumb ? , so they're not here for stimulating conversation and intellectual social intercourse....every ? on the IC is ready for at least 4 ? at any given time. So this means if you want an IC ? the odds are actually 1.6:1 in your favor.
-
ELITE_POSTER wrote: »The numbers game don't work with IC hoes, yo.
If there's 100 ? actively posting and 10 females actively posting it would appear there's a 1/10 chance for a ? to get some from an IC ? . This is false, of the 100 ? , half are gonna be lame and disqualified from the beginning. This now makes it 1/5 odds but still this number is overexaggerated. Now, out of those 50 ? , you're gonna have half these ? that ain't even thinkin about conversatin with some ? on a hip hop website. Now this brings us down to 2.5:1. This seems like it gives ? about a 40% chance if he shoots his shot, but even this isn't correct as we have to factor in the most important concept in this whole topic. IC hoes are some real hoes, these hoes ain't lookin for one man, they're on a hip hop website with a bunch of dumb ? , so they're not here for stimulating conversation and intellectual social intercourse....every ? on the IC is ready for at least 4 ? at any given time. So this means if you want an IC ? the odds are actually 1.6:1 in your favor.
-
we have no beef.
-
aint no story.
-
Word. They don't hear you bruh.Rubato Garcia wrote: »The Iconoclast wrote: »
So Cain, Icon"oclast, Lurk and Tony Dubbz live near Six yet a white ? was able to come in you weak ? state and pull her. Damn NC lost and maybe the SC posters were right SC> NC I guess. ? I bet even PR and Matt if they wanted couldve smashed. Six was choosing and u ? didnt get chosed
about 5 hours ago
Answer
I was going to ignore this cowardly anonymous post but I'll respond just to debunk an IC myth once and for all.1. Lol @ the notion that the standard of comparison between two neighboring states is one state's ability to keep a random citizen from befriending or having sex with a person from another state.
2. However with that said, if we actually use that logic...then the state of NC still didn't take a L.
Since to keep it 100, @SixSickSins actually 'chose' me. Nonetheless, she finally became attached to the idea of Lou flying down to NC and meeting her when she became annoyed with waiting on me (among other things after her unfortunate circumstance.)
Here's the backstory:
She initiated, by showing interest in me (merely as a poster and on a platonic level then) within months after I signed up on this site last year in after she begin reading my posts in the GnS/Social Lounge. After that, many months later she found out how I looked, she immediately wanted to talk to me offline about my relationship status (and info/personal details about my life) and wanted to meet up (movies/gun range then place to eat then my place or hers it didn't matter according to her, but she preferred my spot).
Eventually, she apparently grew tired of my laid-back, take-it-slow approach with her (one of the things she disliked about me was my natural aversion to meeting females off websites/forums I frequent and my preference for local females I've seen in person). I think she took it personal or thinks I led her on I guess, when it wasn't like that since I would've done the same to any female in that scenario - I met online/from social media. I'm type of guy that even if I joke around say things like I want to meet up or in her case say it and actually mean it, I'm going to take it slow and evaluate whether it's worth doing it.
Hopefully from her perspective I actually didn't come off as leading her on. However, I'll never be one of those cats that will attempt to bag an online female within a week of her reciprocating the interest regardless of the goofy simpish things I type to a female. I'm a chill, introvert irl so l'm fond of privacy and I'm skeptical of anything that can compromise my private info/career/offline associations and friendships (it's the reason I don't like exposures and would never expose a female or anyone for that matter.)
Lou's cool af, so out of respect for him and Six (who I still like immensely as a person) that's the last I'll say about this topic.
Based on my own experience with Six I believe this 100%
It is what it is lol, whether they believe us or not.ELITE_POSTER wrote: »lol @iconoclast being trolled anonymously. Hilarious.
I wasn't going to be on this site but I was lanked to this thread AND I received some information last week that one of you ? was actively attempting to gather information on me for a possible exposure. Allow me to forewarn you right now, this one tree you don't want to bark at for this tree will fall on you. Ten years of exposing people without any repercussions isn't a coincidence, it's a sign that I'm better and smarter than those that wish to take me down. You're no exception homie, now before you continue to trek down the path you're on, reaccess the situation and who your opponents are, do you really want the problems brought to your doorstep that could possibly happen?
You know who you are, I know who you are, if you had a problem with me you should have addressed me like a man, and not showcase your ? tendencies by gossipin with females about a real ? .
Yeah bruh. That's that verdict, well that's basically the gist of it. I wish her the best moving forward and hopefully she has no hard feelings toward me. Fwiw it wasn't like I swerved her - it was more of a mutual understanding of distance from both sides. I wasn't trying to pull any scumbag moves lol or anything like that.
As for the second part I'd @ that ? , at least reveal a portion of his full username or PM him before you do anything. These clueless ? probably don't even know who you're talking about though or thought it was me lmao. I don't think it's that serious to wage war against that poster though tbh - even if you had beef with said poster for years.
Like Five wisely alluded to earlier, this is just the internet, we're all merely avatars with trivial posts attached to our usernames. Hopefully one day these cats learn about being careful about leaking personal information on the internet. I mean I can't believe it's 2015 and some ? here are still unaware that their digital footprint can be exploited/exposed.
This discussion has been closed.