(spinoff thread) Men out here gettin their salad tossed.... ? or Nah?
Options
Comments
-
I skimmed through a lot of ? .
? sex?? Bruh really -
That ? ?Nothing is going up mine except toilet paper.
-
MrMinimalist wrote: »Nothing is going up mine except toilet paper.
Bruh butt plugs are just as ? -
That ? ?
you have to be literal with in here... they are going by the literal thought of "? " meaning homosexuality... so to them anything getting done sexually between male and female is not considered homosexual (? )... most people in here are saying the act is ? .. and that's where the disagreement starts..LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »Being ? by a straped on woman is the psychological agreement for men who cannot accept the idea and desire of being ? by a man. Cause a ? belongs to a man.
False as already established. Straight men who partake in it have no desire or attraction to men. Those that do yes they are ? .That strap-on stuff is the perfect example of a transformed REJECTED desire.
Cause there is nothing heterosexual in having partners SWITCHING ROLES to get a nut.
So roleplaying of any kind in which the female plays a dominant role ie female cop/agent interrogating you, naughty teacher keeping you after class for detention etc etc.is now ? . Bruh get the ? out here.
Bruh im not talking about this.
A male getting ? by a woman with a ? is ? ! its not about ? . Its about a man getting a PLASTIC ? in the ass.
Do you agree or nah?
-
damobb2deep wrote: »
you have to be literal with in here... they are going by the literal thought of "? " meaning homosexuality... so to them anything getting done sexually between male and female is not considered homosexual (? )... most people in here are saying the act is ? .. and that's where the disagreement starts..LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »Being ? by a straped on woman is the psychological agreement for men who cannot accept the idea and desire of being ? by a man. Cause a ? belongs to a man.
False as already established. Straight men who partake in it have no desire or attraction to men. Those that do yes they are ? .That strap-on stuff is the perfect example of a transformed REJECTED desire.
Cause there is nothing heterosexual in having partners SWITCHING ROLES to get a nut.
So roleplaying of any kind in which the female plays a dominant role ie female cop/agent interrogating you, naughty teacher keeping you after class for detention etc etc.is now ? . Bruh get the ? out here.
Bruh im not talking about this.
A male getting ? by a woman with a ? is ? ! its not about ? . Its about a man getting a PLASTIC ? in the ass.
Do you agree or nah?
If a female is equipped with a PHALUS prothesis like a ? ? and perform nuptial Parade like a man then. she is during the sex act the MALE.
The male reciever, bent over or leg opened like a is during the sexual act A FEMALE.
Furthermore if a female gets to ? just by penetrating her man, she is a butch or a bisexual. If she doesnt, then she plays some ? stuff or plainly satisfies the ? DESIRES OF HER MAN.
All that scenario just a psycological agreement to make the desire of ? ,an ? one,SUITABLE.
So they can use that exact excuse: it was a woman so its not ? .
Yes it is!!! a female AUGMENTED WITH A ? ? IS A MAN until she unstraps.
-
LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »
you have to be literal with in here... they are going by the literal thought of "? " meaning homosexuality... so to them anything getting done sexually between male and female is not considered homosexual (? )... most people in here are saying the act is ? .. and that's where the disagreement starts..LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »Being ? by a straped on woman is the psychological agreement for men who cannot accept the idea and desire of being ? by a man. Cause a ? belongs to a man.
False as already established. Straight men who partake in it have no desire or attraction to men. Those that do yes they are ? .That strap-on stuff is the perfect example of a transformed REJECTED desire.
Cause there is nothing heterosexual in having partners SWITCHING ROLES to get a nut.
So roleplaying of any kind in which the female plays a dominant role ie female cop/agent interrogating you, naughty teacher keeping you after class for detention etc etc.is now ? . Bruh get the ? out here.
Bruh im not talking about this.
A male getting ? by a woman with a ? is ? ! its not about ? . Its about a man getting a PLASTIC ? in the ass.
Do you agree or nah?
If a female is equipped with a PHALUS prothesis like a ? ? and perform nuptial Parade like a man then. she is during the sex act the MALE.
The male reciever, bent over or leg opened like a is during the sexual act A FEMALE.
Furthermore if a female gets to ? just by penetrating her man, she is a butch or a bisexual. If she doesnt, then she plays some ? stuff or plainly satisfies the ? DESIRES OF HER MAN.
All that scenario just a psycological agreement to make the desire of ? ,an ? one,SUITABLE.
So they can use that exact excuse: it was a woman so its not ? .
Yes it is!!! a female AUGMENTED WITH A ? ? IS A MAN until she unstraps.
So glue a horn on a horse and it's a unicorn? French idiot -
not_osirus_jenkins wrote: »LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »
you have to be literal with in here... they are going by the literal thought of "? " meaning homosexuality... so to them anything getting done sexually between male and female is not considered homosexual (? )... most people in here are saying the act is ? .. and that's where the disagreement starts..LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »LEMZPOCALYPSE wrote: »Being ? by a straped on woman is the psychological agreement for men who cannot accept the idea and desire of being ? by a man. Cause a ? belongs to a man.
False as already established. Straight men who partake in it have no desire or attraction to men. Those that do yes they are ? .That strap-on stuff is the perfect example of a transformed REJECTED desire.
Cause there is nothing heterosexual in having partners SWITCHING ROLES to get a nut.
So roleplaying of any kind in which the female plays a dominant role ie female cop/agent interrogating you, naughty teacher keeping you after class for detention etc etc.is now ? . Bruh get the ? out here.
Bruh im not talking about this.
A male getting ? by a woman with a ? is ? ! its not about ? . Its about a man getting a PLASTIC ? in the ass.
Do you agree or nah?
If a female is equipped with a PHALUS prothesis like a ? ? and perform nuptial Parade like a man then. she is during the sex act the MALE.
The male reciever, bent over or leg opened like a is during the sexual act A FEMALE.
Furthermore if a female gets to ? just by penetrating her man, she is a butch or a bisexual. If she doesnt, then she plays some ? stuff or plainly satisfies the ? DESIRES OF HER MAN.
All that scenario just a psycological agreement to make the desire of ? ,an ? one,SUITABLE.
So they can use that exact excuse: it was a woman so its not ? .
Yes it is!!! a female AUGMENTED WITH A ? ? IS A MAN until she unstraps.
So glue a horn on a horse and it's a unicorn? French idiot
Lol yes. Its a horse DISGUISED AS AN UNICORN.
For what purposes? I dont know, maybe you do.
-
I cannot belive this. I wish yall trolled. If not im baffled...
-
Scust at "straight" ? giving detailed instructions on how to be ?
-
Not ?This thread has reached Forum of Fame levels LOL.
-
Not ?funny thread
but its not ? . pretty disgusting to me. But not ? .
Both male and females have ? so how would it be ? if a women licks a mans ? .
In that case wouldn't a woman be ? if a Man licks her ? ? -
Not ?Aint no way it's ? if the same sex not doin anything to each other
? in here just insecure about they manhood -
That ? ?
...says the ? with ? beads on his Christmas wishlistkingofkingz wrote: »Aint no way it's ? if the same sex not doin anything to each other
? in here just insecure about they manhood -
Not ?? beads ain't my thing bruh & it's definitely not on my Christmas list
-
That ? ?
Honestly I'm against double standards for the most part....Shuffington wrote: »funny thread
but its not ? . pretty disgusting to me. But not ? .
Both male and females have ? so how would it be ? if a women licks a mans ? .
In that case wouldn't a woman be ? if a Man licks her ? ?
but I do believe this double standard is warranted...
in the 90's (or older) this thread would be a banable offense... but ? actually don't see how this ? is sweet (not homosexual).. it's baffling... the funny thing is some of the same ? that's doing this ? will call young thug "suspect"..
-
That ? ?but I do feel it odd that the ? defending this is hiding behind a technicality... and basically using the fact that people are interchanging the term "? " and "suspect"... reading most post they will say "it's not ? because a woman is doing it" but not understand it's the act that is the problem not the sex of the people licking the man's ass..
-
Not ?OK, Ima keep this one as adult as I can...
Im no expert on this sh*t but .... if there wasn't a direct correlation for men on how the sensitive nerve endings on the ? can stimulate the prostate and lead to an orgasm or how the sensitive nerve endings for women can stimulate the ? and lead to orgasms...
I'd be like... yeah its highly suspect. Like a dude sucking on a ? would be highly suspect even if it was just him and his girl, because theres no evidence that action points to a direct physical orgasm.
Again, Highly disgusting IMO but not ? since ? activity can activate a physical orgasm when we're talking about male-female sexual activity.
-
Not ?This thread got so weird
-
MsSouthern wrote: »This thread started so weird
Fixed... -
Not ?MsSouthern wrote: »This thread got so weird
Just look at how ? these "consider how I would look" ass ? made this thread. -
Aren't you one of the ? that constantly flags me in the reason?
I could tell you weren't smart by your posts over there, this post of yours reaffirms thatElzo69Renaissance wrote: »kingofkingz wrote: »Another man hitting on a manin here yeah that's ? . Another man imagining what another man is doin wit someone else sexually is ? as ?
What a man likes to do with a female isn't ? .. I'm baffled as ? to why yall trippin not like any of u mfs gon be in the area while I'm having sexually activity with a chick
so if a chick bends u over with the ? nh as long as its a chick, its not ? ?Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »kingofkingz wrote: »Another man hitting on a manin here yeah that's ? . Another man imagining what another man is doin wit someone else sexually is ? as ?
What a man likes to do with a female isn't ? .. I'm baffled as ? to why yall trippin not like any of u mfs gon be in the area while I'm having sexually activity with a chick
so if a chick bends u over with the ? nh as long as its a chick, its not ? ?
Suspect and questionable yes, ? no.
If you like getting ? in the ass, you are ? . Who questions this???
psychologist, sex experts, and adult performers would disagree. When two lesibans ? each other in the ? /ass with ? 's strap-ons.. are they now straight?
No, because the ? is the usual way ALL women get stimulated.
The logic you and other are displaying is ? and ignorant.
People get aroused/turned on by head and passionate kissing.. so do ? and lesbians. So its now ? to get hard when she sucking your ? or yall making out, because ? do it too.
Let end this right now.. If a guy is attracted too, turned on by, have desires/thoughts of, and partake in sexual activity with men then he is ? .
Partaking in sexual activity with women and getting off on women using a ? isn't ? .
Cats are so ? paranoid and ? a ? grabbing your ass when you ? her missionary, you cats would call that ? too.
I regret entering this thread, I should have kept dodging it
The phallus represents the pinnacle of masculinity
ANY form of ? enacted on EITHER gender is an act of submission
The act of a person being penetrated by a ? object or ANY object is feminine in nature and an act of submission
You are submitting to the representation of masculinity. This means that you are taking on the feminine submissive role
So yes, its most definitely ? . Regardless of who's doing it
That lesbian argument doesn't hold up because even the most ? lesbian still likes being penetrated by ? objects
Male ? and female ? are very different -
I've been around since about Feb/March time frame and this is tha 2nd "ass eating" thread I've seen...so my question is is this a bi-yearly topic?!? Or is this some kind'a "year of tha flaming bootyhole dragon" celebration on tha Chinese calendar y'all muhfuckas celebratin'?? Just curious...or should I say just a question because it seems like there's already enough "curiosity" goin' on in here...
-
Not ?damobb2deep wrote: »
Honestly I'm against double standards for the most part....Shuffington wrote: »funny thread
but its not ? . pretty disgusting to me. But not ? .
Both male and females have ? so how would it be ? if a women licks a mans ? .
In that case wouldn't a woman be ? if a Man licks her ? ?
but I do believe this double standard is warranted...
in the 90's (or older) this thread would be a banable offense... but ? actually don't see how this ? is sweet (not homosexual).. it's baffling... the funny thing is some of the same ? that's doing this ? will call young thug "suspect"..
Sweet/Suspect does not = ? . Young Thug style of clothing and mannerisms is suspect but since..idk or care to know what he does behind close doors I cannot call him ? even though I would never suggest a straight man dressing/acting like him
Folks say the same ? about Kanye West and about bunch of folks industry when we really don't what goes on.. But Those Calling Kanye ? due to his style of dress or his sensitive feelings aren't and have no chance of ? Kim K or the other women he's been with.
To flip it back, those calling this act ? I'm sure some are or at one point Lil Wayne fans. A person that we have photo and video proof of kissing another man on the lips. Kanye Shrugs. -
That ? ?MsSouthern wrote: »This thread got so weird
Just look at how ? these "consider how I would look" ass ? made this thread.
you going hard for the ? eating side... yes that ? looks feminine... and idk because I was raised "don't let No one play with your ass".. so the ? is suspect... I will Greg Hardy a bytch for even trying to violate me like that.. that ? mad sweet and idgaf how y'all try and make that "normal" that ? is not.. Idc if that ? gives me the best orgasm in the world I'm fine with the ones I have now...
btw they say heroine the 1st time you have it gives you a high better than any orgasm you have ever had..... if y'all will do suspect ? for an orgasm... might as well get your needle game up... -
Not ?damobb2deep wrote: »MsSouthern wrote: »This thread got so weird
Just look at how ? these "consider how I would look" ass ? made this thread.
you going hard for the ? eating side... yes that ? looks feminine... and idk because I was raised "don't let No one play with your ass".. so the ? is suspect... I will Greg Hardy a bytch for even trying to violate me like that.. that ? mad sweet and idgaf how y'all try and make that "normal" that ? is not.. Idc if that ? gives me the best orgasm in the world I'm fine with the ones I have now...
btw they say heroine the 1st time you have it gives you a high better than any orgasm you have ever had..... if y'all will do suspect ? for an orgasm... might as well get your needle game up...
I'm not going hard for either side. I'm just saying it ain't ? if it's a woman who is licking ass.
If she wants to show the that type of love, I'd be a ? fool to deny her the privilege.
It's never happened to me...so I can't and never have made it seem like a normal thing. What I ain't gonna do is play stupid and act like I'm 7 years old and think that "butt play" is what makes someone ? .
? dudes are SEXUALLY attracted to DUDES.
You may or may not ? women in the ass & that's between you and them, but I'm almost positive it wouldn't be ? if you did...simply because she has a ? .
Y'all have these primitive ways of thinking that defies logic.
