[Netflix] Marvel's Jessica Jones 11.20.15
Options
Comments
-
pissedoffnobody wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »BangEm_Bart wrote: »I'm seeing so many religious references in this and daredevil. It's crazy.You see them setting up the Nuke angle with the pills?It doesn't look like he'll be getting the cybernetic enhancements and stuff if he'll remain a netflix villain unless they decide to place him in the movies.Considering the ass kicking he got and the fact we've already got Deathlok over on Agents of SHIELD as well as Coulson with his robot arm, I could see them bringing him back with upgrades if they are planning to do a variation on the Born Again arc in Daredevil. It'd be nice if we got Thor and Cap cameos for that.That's another thing I've been wondering about is why they haven't really mentioned much of AOS. Especially with Inhumans popping up everywhere now. I couldn't really hear what heroes were getting named on the radio or was that more of a easter egg to never be mentioned again lol.I think the IGH shell company will tie into HYDRA and the Inhumans stuff about them trying to create metahumans for the last 70 years. Nice to see Rosario Dawson briefly too when Cage goes to the hospital.Maan I'm actually on that episode right now and she was just telling her about Matt trying to help the city and how he could help her with Killgrave. My face during that whole scene
-
How the ?a shotgun knock Cage the ? out like that though lol?
-
-
pissedoffnobody wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »
You know what that makes sense.
Luke's been KO'd in comics before. Hank Pym shrunk down to do heart surgery on him before so his internals are soft in the comics too. MCU powersets are scaled down for the most part, they nerfed the ? of Thor to make him work because he's OP in the comics, they've nerfed Jessica too, hopefully we'll get more radar sense for Daredevil in season 2 but that's been nerfed and mostly implied too.
Oh yea the nerfing I knew about especially Thor, Drax and Gamora. DD I don't think was too too bad though.The ? Purple man died?? Whattt the fuckkkk another one? I mean it makes sense for someone like him to die but damn lol. -
Questiondid Jessica Jones ? Luke Cage wife in the comics?
-
-
Still good acting in the series, I like the character depth even though the story has changed I hope this and daredevil have at least 3 seasons.
-
pissedoffnobody wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »
You know what that makes sense.
Luke's been KO'd in comics before. Hank Pym shrunk down to do heart surgery on him before so his internals are soft in the comics too. MCU powersets are scaled down for the most part, they nerfed the ? of Thor to make him work because he's OP in the comics, they've nerfed Jessica too, hopefully we'll get more radar sense for Daredevil in season 2 but that's been nerfed and mostly implied too.
Oh yea the nerfing I knew about especially Thor, Drax and Gamora. DD I don't think was too too bad though.The ? Purple man died?? Whattt the fuckkkk another one? I mean it makes sense for someone like him to die but damn lol.I was more surprised Luke didn't get involved at the docks but maybe the footage I saw a few weeks ago will be used in his forthcoming solo series. Genuinely was waiting on an "I'm nothing like you" beatdown.That's where my shotgun comment was really coming from lol dude was laid out for damn near 2 episodes. I do look forward to his series though and whooping ass in Harlem. I wonder if he'll meet Claire again for his series or run into Matt at some point. -
pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »CottonCitySlim wrote: »just finished watching
It was a good show but I think this shouldn't have been the second show in the series, Luke should of came second.
It didn't really feel like a Super hero series, just a soap opera with ? with powers. Not gonna knock it because it was just like ALIAS.
It's not a superhero series, it's a neo-noir with a female antagonist who happens to have powers. It's not trying to be The Flash. Also it is with good reason they did this second, people were starting to accuse Marvel of sexism by not greenlighting a Black Widow film or much merch for her.ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »SMH Krysten Ritter coulda showed the ? when she was getting ? by ol' dude though
That's a Marvel thing, not a Netflix thing. They are here to tell stories, not produce pornography so if they wouldn't show it in a comic, they won't show it on screen.
You took a not serious post a little too far there bruh.
EDIT: Also I don't remember them ever showing a dude eating the cat in comics bro
They didn't show you though, they suggested it. It's the same as cable nudity, suggestion is not the same as depiction which is why they cut Pepper ? the Mandarin and the video going viral from Iron Man 3, they didn't want to denigrate her character after building her up in the previous two movies by making her a sexual ? . Same deal with this series and her redemption arc, it's a story of her taking empowering herself after someone abused her powers for themselves and made her a victim when she just wanted to be a hero.
Suggested it? So dude was just under the covers shaving her legs? Okay bro. Dude was straight up under the covers munching. I guess those faces she was making was because she was being tickled
People moving around under the covers is still just suggestive. You don't see any actual genitalia or sex acts in detail. It's not Blue Is The Colour. I'm not going to explain the MPAA or FCC ratings systems to you because that's their job and their websites detail what falls under what rating based on what content is shown. I am not spending time explaining the details to your ? .
? . You can't be serious. You don't have to show nudity to be able to know what's going on. We adults here aren't we? They didn't show ol' girl's hands actually going into the jawn's ? on the desk, but you knew she was getting finger popped did you not? They didn't show actual penetrating but you knew she was riding Luke Cage till the cows came home did you not? Come on yo, come on. Wasn't ? "suggested" about any of that.
I'm not your ? . If you don't understand the difference between actual depiction and suggestive movement and why one gets you and R rating and one gets you a a PG-13, go do the reading and learn the difference.
You right my ? , he was just under the covers around her crotch area painting her toenails. It all makes sense
That's not what I am saying
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHOWING ACTUAL SEX ON SCREEN WHICH IS PORNOGRAPHY AND PEOPLE MOVING AROUND UNDER THE SHEETS WITHOUT EXPOSING GENITALIA OR CLEARLY DEPICTING SEX ACTS. YOU CAN HAVE A GUY COME FROM UNDER THE SHEETS CLEARLY IMPLYING ORAL SEX BUT YOU CAN'T SHOW ACTUAL ORAL SEX OR THAT GETS A R RATING.
Do you understand the difference between pornography and a sex scene in a movie or not? If not, I'm just going to stop now because I feel like I'm trying to explain something simple and obvious and you're too stupid to understand so you keep insisting I am suggesting they were doing something other than ? , which they were meant to appear to be doing but weren't actually doing BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTORS ON SET PRETENDING TO APPEAR TO HAVE SEX, not actually having sex that is clearly depicted like a porno. Jason Biggs wasn't actually jacking off into a sock at the start of American Pie nor did he actually eat Alyson Hannigan out at the end of the movie, nor am I suggesting that implication was meant to suggest he simply licked her kneecaps.
? Hell. This is not hard to comprehend for most people. You're a special kind of special.
You typing an awful lot my friend. It was fairly obvious Simpson was eating Tricia's ? . There was no "suggesting" about it. Anyone who watched that besides you seemed to be able to understand what was going on. It ain't even that serious bro. -
Also one thing that did bother me was how inconsistent her powers were. It was like one second she was thowing dudes with one arm, and the next she could only do a little bit. Like how you that strong and the only thing that's really showing your strength is you punching glass and shizz?
-
so she just snaps dudes neck and that's it? Really? She could of done that episode 1
-
TheBossman wrote: »so she just snaps dudes neck and that's it? Really? She could of done that episode 1Killing Lukes wife scarred her because she's not a killer by nature. Also, she wanted to save Hope from prison which is why she never killed him in the first place. After she killed herself the gloves were off at that point.
-
ShencotheMC wrote: »Also one thing that did bother me was how inconsistent her powers were. It was like one second she was thowing dudes with one arm, and the next she could only do a little bit. Like how you that strong and the only thing that's really showing your strength is you punching glass and shizz?
Plot -
pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »CottonCitySlim wrote: »just finished watching
It was a good show but I think this shouldn't have been the second show in the series, Luke should of came second.
It didn't really feel like a Super hero series, just a soap opera with ? with powers. Not gonna knock it because it was just like ALIAS.
It's not a superhero series, it's a neo-noir with a female antagonist who happens to have powers. It's not trying to be The Flash. Also it is with good reason they did this second, people were starting to accuse Marvel of sexism by not greenlighting a Black Widow film or much merch for her.ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »SMH Krysten Ritter coulda showed the ? when she was getting ? by ol' dude though
That's a Marvel thing, not a Netflix thing. They are here to tell stories, not produce pornography so if they wouldn't show it in a comic, they won't show it on screen.
You took a not serious post a little too far there bruh.
EDIT: Also I don't remember them ever showing a dude eating the cat in comics bro
They didn't show you though, they suggested it. It's the same as cable nudity, suggestion is not the same as depiction which is why they cut Pepper ? the Mandarin and the video going viral from Iron Man 3, they didn't want to denigrate her character after building her up in the previous two movies by making her a sexual ? . Same deal with this series and her redemption arc, it's a story of her taking empowering herself after someone abused her powers for themselves and made her a victim when she just wanted to be a hero.
Suggested it? So dude was just under the covers shaving her legs? Okay bro. Dude was straight up under the covers munching. I guess those faces she was making was because she was being tickled
People moving around under the covers is still just suggestive. You don't see any actual genitalia or sex acts in detail. It's not Blue Is The Colour. I'm not going to explain the MPAA or FCC ratings systems to you because that's their job and their websites detail what falls under what rating based on what content is shown. I am not spending time explaining the details to your ? .
? . You can't be serious. You don't have to show nudity to be able to know what's going on. We adults here aren't we? They didn't show ol' girl's hands actually going into the jawn's ? on the desk, but you knew she was getting finger popped did you not? They didn't show actual penetrating but you knew she was riding Luke Cage till the cows came home did you not? Come on yo, come on. Wasn't ? "suggested" about any of that.
I'm not your ? . If you don't understand the difference between actual depiction and suggestive movement and why one gets you and R rating and one gets you a a PG-13, go do the reading and learn the difference.
You right my ? , he was just under the covers around her crotch area painting her toenails. It all makes sense
That's not what I am saying
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHOWING ACTUAL SEX ON SCREEN WHICH IS PORNOGRAPHY AND PEOPLE MOVING AROUND UNDER THE SHEETS WITHOUT EXPOSING GENITALIA OR CLEARLY DEPICTING SEX ACTS. YOU CAN HAVE A GUY COME FROM UNDER THE SHEETS CLEARLY IMPLYING ORAL SEX BUT YOU CAN'T SHOW ACTUAL ORAL SEX OR THAT GETS A R RATING.
Do you understand the difference between pornography and a sex scene in a movie or not? If not, I'm just going to stop now because I feel like I'm trying to explain something simple and obvious and you're too stupid to understand so you keep insisting I am suggesting they were doing something other than ? , which they were meant to appear to be doing but weren't actually doing BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTORS ON SET PRETENDING TO APPEAR TO HAVE SEX, not actually having sex that is clearly depicted like a porno. Jason Biggs wasn't actually jacking off into a sock at the start of American Pie nor did he actually eat Alyson Hannigan out at the end of the movie, nor am I suggesting that implication was meant to suggest he simply licked her kneecaps.
? Hell. This is not hard to comprehend for most people. You're a special kind of special.
You typing an awful lot my friend. It was fairly obvious Simpson was eating Tricia's ? . There was no "suggesting" about it. Anyone who watched that besides you seemed to be able to understand what was going on. It ain't even that serious bro.
This is an example of a man who probably has an 76 IQ but a good spell check program.
If that's how you feel brother, I will not take offense. I just hope that one day you find whatever it is that you seek in life.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/11/20/marvels-jessica-jones-episode-5-aka-the-sandwich-saved-me-reviewMeanwhile, even as Trish and Simpson are getting along, to say the least (hello, oral sex scene!), it seems like things could get really nasty between Simpson and Jessica at any moment.The first hint we have that Trish has started sleeping with another character is an overhead shot clearly intended to make us think she's sleeping fitfully or just waking up, until it's revealed that she's got a guy eagerly, enthusiastically going down on her.
http://www.polygon.com/2015/11/20/9764440/jessica-jones-sex-scenes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeATB8_i2yo
From 2:00 to 2:10
This all stems from you taking a "not serious AT ALL" post way too seriously to the point where you think I'm expecting them to get butt naked to ? on some skinemax ? . Funny you questioning my intelligence when you completely whiffed on the sarcasm and intended comedy in my original post. I guess sarcasm and satire truly is the language of the intelligent, but then again my IQ is 76 and all right. LOL -
Lmfao purple man made dude pour hot coffee on his face
-
Aye is the cop Simpson a comic character?
-
I kinda figure he would stay long term cuz dude isfucking nuts
-
Ayee ? was rapping Kendrick
-
those twins had a weird relationship
-
Damn marveln2-0 with these villains . I lowkey became sympathetic for purple man when he was telling Jessica his story
-
BangEm_Bart wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »CottonCitySlim wrote: »just finished watching
It was a good show but I think this shouldn't have been the second show in the series, Luke should of came second.
It didn't really feel like a Super hero series, just a soap opera with ? with powers. Not gonna knock it because it was just like ALIAS.
It's not a superhero series, it's a neo-noir with a female antagonist who happens to have powers. It's not trying to be The Flash. Also it is with good reason they did this second, people were starting to accuse Marvel of sexism by not greenlighting a Black Widow film or much merch for her.ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »pissedoffnobody wrote: »ShencotheMC wrote: »SMH Krysten Ritter coulda showed the ? when she was getting ? by ol' dude though
That's a Marvel thing, not a Netflix thing. They are here to tell stories, not produce pornography so if they wouldn't show it in a comic, they won't show it on screen.
You took a not serious post a little too far there bruh.
EDIT: Also I don't remember them ever showing a dude eating the cat in comics bro
They didn't show you though, they suggested it. It's the same as cable nudity, suggestion is not the same as depiction which is why they cut Pepper ? the Mandarin and the video going viral from Iron Man 3, they didn't want to denigrate her character after building her up in the previous two movies by making her a sexual ? . Same deal with this series and her redemption arc, it's a story of her taking empowering herself after someone abused her powers for themselves and made her a victim when she just wanted to be a hero.
Suggested it? So dude was just under the covers shaving her legs? Okay bro. Dude was straight up under the covers munching. I guess those faces she was making was because she was being tickled
People moving around under the covers is still just suggestive. You don't see any actual genitalia or sex acts in detail. It's not Blue Is The Colour. I'm not going to explain the MPAA or FCC ratings systems to you because that's their job and their websites detail what falls under what rating based on what content is shown. I am not spending time explaining the details to your ? .
? . You can't be serious. You don't have to show nudity to be able to know what's going on. We adults here aren't we? They didn't show ol' girl's hands actually going into the jawn's ? on the desk, but you knew she was getting finger popped did you not? They didn't show actual penetrating but you knew she was riding Luke Cage till the cows came home did you not? Come on yo, come on. Wasn't ? "suggested" about any of that.
I'm not your ? . If you don't understand the difference between actual depiction and suggestive movement and why one gets you and R rating and one gets you a a PG-13, go do the reading and learn the difference.
You right my ? , he was just under the covers around her crotch area painting her toenails. It all makes sense
That's not what I am saying
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHOWING ACTUAL SEX ON SCREEN WHICH IS PORNOGRAPHY AND PEOPLE MOVING AROUND UNDER THE SHEETS WITHOUT EXPOSING GENITALIA OR CLEARLY DEPICTING SEX ACTS. YOU CAN HAVE A GUY COME FROM UNDER THE SHEETS CLEARLY IMPLYING ORAL SEX BUT YOU CAN'T SHOW ACTUAL ORAL SEX OR THAT GETS A R RATING.
Do you understand the difference between pornography and a sex scene in a movie or not? If not, I'm just going to stop now because I feel like I'm trying to explain something simple and obvious and you're too stupid to understand so you keep insisting I am suggesting they were doing something other than ? , which they were meant to appear to be doing but weren't actually doing BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTORS ON SET PRETENDING TO APPEAR TO HAVE SEX, not actually having sex that is clearly depicted like a porno. Jason Biggs wasn't actually jacking off into a sock at the start of American Pie nor did he actually eat Alyson Hannigan out at the end of the movie, nor am I suggesting that implication was meant to suggest he simply licked her kneecaps.
? Hell. This is not hard to comprehend for most people. You're a special kind of special.
Listen to standardized slaughter and you'll understand why shenco is unique.
I have no idea what that has to do with anything other than to mention that the 7 Days of Summer EP is available for stream and download right now -
StoneColdMikey wrote: »Damn marveln2-0 with these villains . I lowkey became sympathetic for purple man when he was telling Jessica his story
I didn't. I was like this ? ain't bout to inception me that kid probly wasn't even him -
atribecalledgabi wrote: »StoneColdMikey wrote: »Damn marveln2-0 with these villains . I lowkey became sympathetic for purple man when he was telling Jessica his story
I didn't. I was like this ? ain't bout to inception me that kid probly wasn't even him
Then I became sympathetic to his parents when I found out why they did it for him and then he just became really evil lol -
]atribecalledgabi wrote: »StoneColdMikey wrote: »Damn marveln2-0 with these villains . I lowkey became sympathetic for purple man when he was telling Jessica his story
I didn't. I was like this ? ain't bout to inception me that kid probly wasn't even him
He wouldn't have powers if it wasn't but I feel ya lol -
Oh ? the end of episide 9!!!
