UH OH: ‘The Birth of a Nation’ Star Nate Parker Addresses College ? Trial
Options
Comments
-
Nate is getting ? from both sides from black faux feminists and militant black Twitter, he's ? , he married a Becky. That man can't win for losing. Lol
Just another reason why black people with money doesn't want to help -
The conviction was over turned.......Swiffness! wrote: »Asked if the movie should be released, he responded: “I think that’s up to the people,” Johnny said. “I don’t think a ? should be celebrated. It’s really a cultural decision we’re making as a society to go to the theater and speak with our dollars and reward a sexual predator.”
? you, you're white, you can't possibly understand the cultural decision behind a black person who chooses to watch this film.
These Black feminists better get their priorities ? straight
The way ? has been treated in this country and continues to be you can't blame women for feeling some type of way about 2 dudes accused of ? , 1 actually convicted, and supporting a movie they're behind. You can't pretend as if ? hasn't been treated as a non issue by people in many instances where in some countries women get killed for it and even in the US we got documented evidence of police and courts ? victims over
Because she didnt want to go to trial again & testify all over again. -
ThaNubianGod wrote: »Black_Thunder wrote: »? gotta white wife, figures
I aint seeing that ? now anyway
She's Latina though, not white.
Shes cac
http://articlebio.com/sarah-disanto
Ah, my bad. Always heard she was latina. -
Nate is getting ? from both sides from black faux feminists and militant black Twitter, he's ? , he married a Becky. That man can't win for losing. Lol
He is trying to make amends for his cooning and aggressive sexual history. -
So we have another instance of a ? overperkin', gettin' a train ran on her, then having the nerve to cry ? .
-
In b4 @Westie
-
Maximus Rex wrote: »So we have another instance of a ? overperkin', gettin' a train ran on her, then having the nerve to cry ? .
this..... I read that transcript... ? was willfully toppin ? off.... slobbin it down 2 handed and carrying on. ? read like an erotica novel.. You can't put this dude and the dude smashin an unconscious chick behind a dumpster in the same category.... -
powerman 5000 wrote: »Maximus Rex wrote: »So we have another instance of a ? overperkin', gettin' a train ran on her, then having the nerve to cry ? .
this..... I read that transcript... ? was willfully toppin ? off.... slobbin it down 2 handed and carrying on. ? read like an erotica novel.. You can't put this dude and the dude smashin an unconscious chick behind a dumpster in the same category....
Post the transcript.... -
Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
-
fake outrage
-
Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ? -
I just followed this link. ? had to remind dude that he smashed and nutted on her back.... If ? felt THAT violated, she should have let the police contact him. -
Honestly, this sudden ? case makes me want to watch it even more.
-
powerman 5000 wrote: »
I just followed this link. ? had to remind dude that he smashed and nutted on her back.... If ? felt THAT violated, she should have let the police contact him.
Dude was trying to be as vague as possible with everything. -
Brother_Five wrote: »Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ?
Ive had chicks pass out on me in my bed as im just about to smash. You know what i didnt do? Smash and then call my homie to smash. The other guys testimony is pretty damning to them. Idk what incompetent prosecutor allowed them to skate off. Hes a ? just as bad as the swimmer. -
Brother_Five wrote: »Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ?
Ive had chicks pass out on me in my bed as im just about to smash. You know what i didnt do? Smash and then call my homie to smash. The other guys testimony is pretty damning to them. Idk what incompetent prosecutor allowed them to skate off. Hes a ? just as bad as the swimmer.
How do u know that that is what happened? -
Brother_Five wrote: »Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ?
Ive had chicks pass out on me in my bed as im just about to smash. You know what i didnt do? Smash and then call my homie to smash. The other guys testimony is pretty damning to them. Idk what incompetent prosecutor allowed them to skate off. Hes a ? just as bad as the swimmer.
This is true but nowhere in that transcript does ol girl say she was passed out. She just says she was ? , which legally is ? and that's where alot of people stop at. They see a ? girl say she doesn't remember what happened and that she wouldn't have done it if she were sober. That statement alone gives both sides their ammo. The "She got ? to do something she wanted to do" crowd and the "They took advantage of a ? girl" crowd can both use what she's saying for or against her. -
Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
How was he a ? ?
The same ? that accused Nate and his Friends of ? , also accused her sister and her husband of kidnapping her...
But yea, let's pile on that brotha..."Jennifer’s psychosis took on a violent streak and she even accused Sharon and her husband of kidnapping her after Jennifer was admitted to a mental institution." -
Brother_Five wrote: »Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ?
Ive had chicks pass out on me in my bed as im just about to smash. You know what i didnt do? Smash and then call my homie to smash. The other guys testimony is pretty damning to them. Idk what incompetent prosecutor allowed them to skate off. Hes a ? just as bad as the swimmer.
This is true but nowhere in that transcript does ol girl say she was passed out. She just says she was ? , which legally is ? and that's where alot of people stop at. They see a ? girl say she doesn't remember what happened and that she wouldn't have done it if she were sober. That statement alone gives both sides their ammo. The "She got ? to do something she wanted to do" crowd and the "They took advantage of a ? girl" crowd can both use what she's saying for or against her.
@Tymoney19 makin ? up and running with it...
-
? lie about ? all the time...
Remeber the dude who played Romeo Santana on the steve harvey show?....RIP
Remember how he died?
The ? was feeling Nate Parker. He saw her as a jump off. They ranned a train on the ? . She felt violated then wanted revenge. The end.
Alotta u ? in here, are hoe ass ? , -
Brother_Five wrote: »Dudes a ? stop defending him. Yeah its convenient this came up again because of the movie. Doesnt make him less of a ? . Idk how family members of victims let these guys walk away off technicalities of the justice sytem. Street justice shouldve caught up with them.
These type of statements puzzle me
How do u know beyond a shadow of a doubt he is a ? ?
Ive had chicks pass out on me in my bed as im just about to smash. You know what i didnt do? Smash and then call my homie to smash. The other guys testimony is pretty damning to them. Idk what incompetent prosecutor allowed them to skate off. Hes a ? just as bad as the swimmer.
This is true but nowhere in that transcript does ol girl say she was passed out. She just says she was ? , which legally is ? and that's where alot of people stop at. They see a ? girl say she doesn't remember what happened and that she wouldn't have done it if she were sober. That statement alone gives both sides their ammo. The "She got ? to do something she wanted to do" crowd and the "They took advantage of a ? girl" crowd can both use what she's saying for or against her.
@Tymoney19 makin ? up and running with it...
The bold isn't in full context because I also said that legally it's ? to sleep with a woman when she's ? , especially too ? to consent. That convo between them two seems to show ol girl was blackout ? to where she didn't have a memory of what happened. That there is enough for many to say she wasn't able to consent, while some would argue she got that ? so she could do some wild ? under the guise of being ? .... -
-
Yall really caping for a ? . Continue on.
-
Moral of the story...leave those white women alone ,because your black ass will get thrown under a bus that is on fire.
-
No one was convicted
But the conviction was overtuned.
Mind blown. How does one overturn something that didn't happen?
