The Official Game vs Meek Mill Beef Thread (The Reason roasting Gee)
Options
Comments
-
McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
-
I don't say so
But if you really want to know, it's really just that easy to google -
Akinyele already explained that the dischord between Jay and Nas started in 1991......
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
What 2nd verse was Nas supposed to be on??
Dead Presidents II is on Reasonable Doubt...
There's a Dead Presidents I. You know this right?
I'm not sure how y'all think that beef started but again y'all seem to be trying to jump out the window
And again, I'm not sure why you think that an artist is incapable of being angry at more than 1 person at a time
And none of you are answering the question as to why JAY Z even brought it up 5 YEARS LATER in the first place
Smh -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Akinyele already explained that the dischord between Jay and Nas started in 1991......
Discord =/= beef
And I shouldn't have had to say that -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
What 2nd verse was Nas supposed to be on??
Dead Presidents II is on Reasonable Doubt...
There's a Dead Presidents I. You know this right?
I'm not sure how y'all think that beef started but again y'all seem to be trying to jump out the window
And again, I'm not sure why you think that an artist is incapable of being angry at more than 1 person at a time
And none of you are answering the question as to why JAY Z even brought it up 5 YEARS LATER in the first place
Smh
When Reasonable Doubt dropped, the album included a version different from that of the video: same beat, same hook, new lyrics, equally dope. Nas was allegedly supposed to re-record the hook for part two but he left Hova high and dry, .
From Ski's mouth nh....you know the guy who produced the song
let me know if u need the link -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
What 2nd verse was Nas supposed to be on??
Dead Presidents II is on Reasonable Doubt...
There's a Dead Presidents I. You know this right?
I'm not sure how y'all think that beef started but again y'all seem to be trying to jump out the window
And again, I'm not sure why you think that an artist is incapable of being angry at more than 1 person at a time
And none of you are answering the question as to why JAY Z even brought it up 5 YEARS LATER in the first place
Smh
When Reasonable Doubt dropped, the album included a version different from that of the video: same beat, same hook, new lyrics, equally dope. Nas was allegedly supposed to re-record the hook for part two but he left Hova high and dry, .
From Ski's mouth nh....you know the guy who produced the song
let me know if u need the link
Nah I don't
Thank you for proving my point again
The beef is over the HOOK that Jay Z used without permission
And clearly Nas did not rerecord it on purpose -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
What 2nd verse was Nas supposed to be on??
Dead Presidents II is on Reasonable Doubt...
There's a Dead Presidents I. You know this right?
I'm not sure how y'all think that beef started but again y'all seem to be trying to jump out the window
And again, I'm not sure why you think that an artist is incapable of being angry at more than 1 person at a time
And none of you are answering the question as to why JAY Z even brought it up 5 YEARS LATER in the first place
Smh
When Reasonable Doubt dropped, the album included a version different from that of the video: same beat, same hook, new lyrics, equally dope. Nas was allegedly supposed to re-record the hook for part two but he left Hova high and dry, .
From Ski's mouth nh....you know the guy who produced the song
let me know if u need the link
Actually yeah, can you post that link?
I need to read it because I truly don't trust you ? 's comprehension skills -
Louis Devinear wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Does Nas really Roc hoes, and Roc A Fella really Roc Fellas?
Was this beef legitimately over a female or did Nas come out of left field with ether dissing Jay Z for no reason??
This is what I mean. You're intellectually lazy AND disingenuous AND you are more concerned with drama than what actually happened
You don't know what beef is. I've seen beef first hand. Beef isn't some TV show fabrication
People get touched over beef. And you're promoting violence over a publicity stunt smh
This is why I will continue to call you a culture vultureElzo69Renaissance wrote: »Does Nas really Roc hoes, and Roc A Fella really Roc Fellas?
Was this beef legitimately over a female or did Nas come out of left field with ether dissing Jay Z for no reason??
This is what I mean. You're intellectually lazy AND disingenuous AND you are more concerned with drama than what actually happened
You don't know what beef is. I've seen beef first hand. Beef isn't some TV show fabrication
People get touched over beef. And you're promoting violence over a publicity stunt smh
This is why I will continue to call you a culture vulture
lmao you tell me what was the Jay-Z and NAs beef about?
They were ? the same female...
Jay Z took a Nas bar, made it the hook for Dead Presidents I&II and Nas said he didn't get paid for it
Anything else I can teach you?
You realize those events happened like 5 years apart right? It took 5 years for Jay and Nas to beef over Dead Presidents
They never beefed over dead presidents.
The beef started wit bleek. Bleek said I ball till I fall what you think of that. Nas said you wanna ball till you fall I could help you with that.
Bleek made mind right. And the beef was fully on after that. But the animosity towards jay and nas been there. Cause nas never wanted to be on none of jays albums.
I know that...that's why I asked what sense would it make for Nas to wait 5 years to drop that freestyle going at The Roc where he went at Jay Beans Free and Bleek all in like 6 bars
So you're going out of your way to stay deliberately ignorant.
Cool
Just remember what actually happened with that beef is on this page and even the person you're responding knows that the beef went deeper than that
You do know that 'Takeover' came out first right? Meaning that Jay Z was the first one to bring Dead Presidents up. NOT Nas
You do realize that Nas had to be damn near talked into making a diss track right??
Takeover didn't come out before the Nas freestyle where he had the punchlines about leaving Beans on the freeway. That was in like August 20001.Nobody heard Takeover til Sept when The Blueprint dropped. Only part anybody knew was the verse going at Prodigy he did live....so again the question you've yet to answer is why would it take Nas 5 years to diss Jay over a sample that he apparently should've been mad at Search over?
And that freestyle wasn't a diss track...
Maybe you should ask Nas why he was mad over that, I'm not him
And once again, you're ignoring the fact that Jay Z was the first to speak on Dead Presidents, meaning he already knew why Nas was mad.
Which he should have, it was common knowledge back then
Why did Jay Z wait 5+ years to acknowledge the issue in a verse??
So saying you'll leave a ? who you call put by name in the street ain't a diss track now? -
I come back and now this ? done turned into jay z vs nas #98346372820355u3i2i . How the hell yall be pulling that ? off?
-
make another Jay vs Nas thread...the Game just stated that him, SK and Meek Mill were on 3 way were SK said Meek told him Game had him bottled
-
But its 100 pages in, so i should let yall know what this really about.
Game attempt #12 to reconnect with G-Unit. He knows 50 been had issues with MMG forever and most recently meek in specific. He trying to impress 50.
So catty. -
Noble Al Lee wrote: »I come back and now this ? done turned into jay z vs nas #98346372820355u3i2i . How the hell yall be pulling that ? off?
You're right I'm mad I let these ? suck me in
My initial point was that this beef is illegitimate so the songs are irrelevant
Then these ? tried to go out of their way to de-legitimize real beefs to justify this publicity stunt
I'm done though -
Lol...
Nas was angry about Jay sampling his voice?...
Where did y'all get that from?...Lol...
Nas was angry about Jay sampling his voice?...
Where did y'all get that from?...
I don't recall this and I've never heard that nas was upset at this. If that was the case why would AZ appear in the dead presidents video.Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
Nah. Nas was supposed to be on can I live second verse. Nas stood jay up. That's why when you hear can I live the second verse sounds completely different.
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »McSerch owned Nas s publishing at the time of Dead Presidents.....the story is that Nas was supposed to be on the 2nd verse but never showed after the studio was booked ....which is why he wasnt tripping about it plus if he were mad he d been mad at Serch since he owned his publishing
What 2nd verse was Nas supposed to be on??
Dead Presidents II is on Reasonable Doubt...
There's a Dead Presidents I. You know this right?
I'm not sure how y'all think that beef started but again y'all seem to be trying to jump out the window
And again, I'm not sure why you think that an artist is incapable of being angry at more than 1 person at a time
And none of you are answering the question as to why JAY Z even brought it up 5 YEARS LATER in the first place
Smh
When Reasonable Doubt dropped, the album included a version different from that of the video: same beat, same hook, new lyrics, equally dope. Nas was allegedly supposed to re-record the hook for part two but he left Hova high and dry, .
From Ski's mouth nh....you know the guy who produced the song
let me know if u need the link
............................. -
It's hilarious how these ? have decided to focus all their attention on trying to prove that Game lied about Meek being a snitch.........LOL
Dumb ? .......The only things that matter are the FACTS that Game destroyed Meek verbally with 'Pest Control' and that Meek is a ? for backing down when Game challenged him to a one on one man to man fight.
Y'all purposely trying to change the subject................
-
Russell Simmons said the Meek/Game ? is dead..
Game also admitted he jumped out the window with this whole Meek situation.. Props to Game for owning up to his ? ..
He said he was ? on stage in Miami and
"? Meek Mill" spilled from his mouth..
He said once it happened he had to keep going forward with it..
They supposed to squash it face to face tomorrow.. That would be ill if Game use Russell and This meeting to get close to Meek so he can wup his ass.. -
Heard Russell trying to stop them. ? old heads need to sit the ? down, cuz if Game and Meek wanted to ? each other they'd a done it a long time ago.
-
Game disses were better but hes a ? ?
-
@DWO for what it's worth,
Game said it hurt him when Meek went and got Beans, and he felt bad for dissing him.. -
SmashinYourWaifu wrote: »Game disses were better but hes a ? ?
This. Agreed.
I can't believe you other ? are really out here trying to play spin doctor now that the facts are out. Game jumped the gun and lied like a sucka. It's over.
And in terms of disses, unless we get one more from Meek, then the outcome remains 1-1. Stop trying to act like 92 bars don't exist and calling ? prematurely. -
i can't really ? with either artist.....but Wack was nowhere to be found when them Low End ? wanted a piece. ? got scratched by a simple phone call. Talkin strictly street ? , he at Meek neck because he know how the Problem/Meek scrap ended. He seems to be assuming he'll get the same opportunity. Wack is tryna activate, but it aint really a set thing with Meek, so he might have a issue there. Thing is, Game doesn't have an "East Coast" backing like he did with Jimmy in the slams. So if somethin happen to him out there on his promo run, it might spark some coast ? .
-
So ? lied about meek be a snitch and saying his name. Am i to believe meek facetime nicki too? His diss track starting to look flabby
-
Y'all ? some girls. Lol
-
Beanie should not have gotten himself involved. If it's anything then he should've been the one to try to reconcile it. OGs don't move like that
![[Trillmatic]](https://us.v-cdn.net/5019160/uploads/customavatars/27/navatar_273727.jpg){kind=avatar}
This discussion has been closed.