The Official 2016-2017 NFL Season Thread.
Options
Comments
-
-
This Dak team now. I'm not even a Cowboys fan lol
This...
Most Dallas fans all conflicted and ? , don't even wanna say/admit to that like they gonna jinx Dak or something. lololol
They wasn't a Super Bowl contender w/ Tony ass so let da youngin' ride out. You got to know when to move the ? on mayne. -
Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game. Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
-
I told y'all to chill
-
Bro y'all need to stop acting like you couldn't drive an F-150 through them ? holes our line is making bruh. How the ? Darren McFadden finish with 1100 yards on 10 starts last year? What's the common denominator?
-
BlackAX410 wrote: »
he hasn't acceomplished anything but a playoff win and that always even out with his fumble against the seahawks lol
it crazy how they compared dak to brady and now dak about to get his job from injury lol bledsoe about to call up romo and give him advice -
dallas' 4 eva wrote: »PanchoYoSancho wrote: »Romo was 3-1 before he got hurt.
12-3 the year before with a playoff win.
You bandwagon ? need to shut up lol.
It ain't a bandwagon. Romo's one of the top 6-7 QBs in the league when healthy, but what Dak is doing is special. They're continuing to let the training wheels off him and he's progressively getting better.
You are saying it yourself, he is a top 6-7 Qb. So are you basically saying Dak is a top 5 QB?
I think he is saying that he is going to be a top 5 QB AS LONG AS WE LET HIM COOK. Are you thinking about the future or about right now?
I'm thinking about both. Our best chance RIGHT NOW is with the better QB. Our best chance for the future is obviously Dak.
Watch, first bad game Dak has ? gonna be like "whens romo back?"
Save this post. -
Damn the cowboys look good nh
-
ahht you gotta catch that
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »Romo was 3-1 before he got hurt.
12-3 the year before with a playoff win.
You bandwagon ? need to shut up lol.
It ain't a bandwagon. Romo's one of the top 6-7 QBs in the league when healthy, but what Dak is doing is special. They're continuing to let the training wheels off him and he's progressively getting better.
You are saying it yourself, he is a top 6-7 Qb. So are you basically saying Dak is a top 5 QB?
You can't say that about anybody thru 4.5 games, but he's playing like an elite QB right now. He hasn't had a turnover and our offense is rolling. -
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »Romo was 3-1 before he got hurt.
12-3 the year before with a playoff win.
You bandwagon ? need to shut up lol.
It ain't a bandwagon. Romo's one of the top 6-7 QBs in the league when healthy, but what Dak is doing is special. They're continuing to let the training wheels off him and he's progressively getting better.
You are saying it yourself, he is a top 6-7 Qb. So are you basically saying Dak is a top 5 QB?
No what we saying is as great as Tony is (healthy) we ain't won ? w/ him, ever damn time he gets hits he gets up like a 90 y/o man arthritis, he's 36 and eating up cap that could be used to continue to build up the defense and sign some of the young talent we have, especially on the o-line. -
its....JOHN B wrote: »Weren't Dallas fans calling Zeke a bust after week 1? Smh
Dallas fan. An individual. -
Angeles1son85 wrote: »BlackAX410 wrote: »
he hasn't acceomplished anything but a playoff win and that always even out with his fumble against the seahawks lol
it crazy how they compared dak to brady and now dak about to get his job from injury lol bledsoe about to call up romo and give him advice
The irony of talking about accomplishments when talking about a ROOKIE QB. So tell me what Dak has accomplished?
You one of those dumb ? that always talk about that fumble 10 years ago. Not worth a discussion with you. -
Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game. Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
The training wheels have been coming every week, you serious? Weren't we down 14 at the beginning of the first quarter last week and Dak kept his poise and brought us back? I agree I haven't seen everything, but I have seen enough to give him his shot.
Dak has been very accurate throwing across the middle of the field, dangerous throws bruh not them slants out bounds or screens other QBs be throwing. This offense is opening up every week and I love it. -
the only bad part about our success is i see jerry jones giving that ? garret another extension smh lol
-
BlackAX410 wrote: »
Look at what you are saying. WHAT HAS DAK ACCOMPLISHED?
Can't use "accomplishments" to justify starting Dak, when Dak is LESS ACCOMPLISHED.
? are ? . -
Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game. Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
? you've barley seen Romo in playoff situations, which is why were are having this Dak conversation.
-
Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game.Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
Wait, hole up...
But yall JUST said a couple pages ago that y'all ran this same game plan/style of offense when Demarco was there in '14 (which is true) in his record breaking rushing year. Which is it???!
C'mon brub, this ? ain't nothin' relatively new.
-
Chargers will blow it in the 4th
-
Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game. Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
? you've barley seen Romo in playoff situations, which is why were are having this Dak conversation.
What are you talking about. He's been in 6 playoff games. That's enough of a sample. You're an idiot. -
Demarcus Lawrence has made a NOTICEABLE difference for our pass rush.
-
Lawrence back and making his presence felt
-
Revolver Ocelot wrote: »PanchoYoSancho wrote: »Romo was 3-1 before he got hurt.
12-3 the year before with a playoff win.
You bandwagon ? need to shut up lol.
It ain't a bandwagon. Romo's one of the top 6-7 QBs in the league when healthy, but what Dak is doing is special. They're continuing to let the training wheels off him and he's progressively getting better.
You are saying it yourself, he is a top 6-7 Qb. So are you basically saying Dak is a top 5 QB?
No what we saying is as great as Tony is (healthy) we ain't won ? w/ him, ever damn time he gets hits he gets up like a 90 y/o man arthritis, he's 36 and eating up cap that could be used to continue to build up the defense and sign some of the young talent we have, especially on the o-line.
At least you're being logical -
Cowboys defense been on point
-
Revolver Ocelot wrote: »Basically ? are so fresh off our horrible season last year that now that we are winning, and seemingly only two things have changed (dak&zeke), most people are attributing it to them as the reason for success.
The real reason is that we are playing very conservative because Dak is at the helm, and relying on the running game. Which is how we SHOULD HAVE BEEN PLAYING WITH ROMO ANYWAYS. RG3 looked amazing his rookie year with a conservative gameplan, what happened to him later.
Having a rookie QB forced Garret to adjust our offensive gameplan, to a gameplan that is better suited to our team anyways, and the way we look now is the result.
What happens when we have injuries on the Oline and Dak has to scramble more?
What happens when we're down by 20?
I need to see Dak in ALL situations, including playoffs, before we say he's a better option than Romo. We know what we get with Romo.
? you've barley seen Romo in playoff situations, which is why were are having this Dak conversation.
What are you talking about. He's been in 6 playoff games. That's enough of a sample. You're an idiot.
10/11 seasons, 6 playoff games, 2 wins
You right, we got ? Brady or Montana in Tony Romo.
