40 People Watch Chicago Teen ? On FB Live Without Reporting It
Options
Comments
-
This is why McDonald ...
I doubt anyone actually reads what I post -
ghostdog56 wrote: »Was it an actual ? or did that girl just let a bunch of ? run a train on her?
first of all, she's 15.
second...Since then, the teen has been reunited with her mother. She is being treated in a hospital.
ay, I wanna see justice just like anybody else if its a ?
but that number has nothing to do with the truth
? goes on every day....j/s
True... she could be just your average well-adjusted 9th grader that just happens to be into consensual rough broadcasted ? that lands her in the hospital.
Its not likely but its plausible if we're being honest -
And as expected, the majority of posts on FB are talmbout the 40 people watching it... and how they should be charged too.
That's just some ? to me. -
And as expected, the majority of posts on FB are talmbout the 40 people watching it... and how they should be charged too.
That's just some ? to me.
What if instead of watching live on their phones they were in the same room? Still no harm, no foul? -
I was referring specifically to this situation. Being in the same room might have some other implications - like who's house it was and were they part of it, etc...
Maybe on a public street might be more along with what you're trying to ask ? -
1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you, you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down. -
konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though. -
ghostdog56 wrote: »Was it an actual ? or did that girl just let a bunch of ? run a train on her?
first of all, she's 15.
second...Since then, the teen has been reunited with her mother. She is being treated in a hospital.
you say that as if it means something.
I know a grip of broads that was having trains run at 14-16 years old. White chick that lived down the block from me had something like 8 cats from her class fall through to smash during a half-day. She was 15 at the time. She told me about it herself while we were walking to school one day like the ? was live (my sister who was in the same grade and in her class told me all her male friends came to class the next day talking about how she let some of the dudes ? her in the ass and everything).
Also, in a case like this she would have been take to the hospital on GP and had a ? kit administered.
I'm not very apologetic about this, but I'm taking a wait and see attitude on this one. We all should remember the last highly publicized case where a chick was supposedly gang ? :
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/25/charges-to-be-dropped-against-5-teens-accused-of-gang-? -in-brooklyn-park-prosecutors-say/?utm_term=.448248cdbbca
since they live streamed this, the chances are pretty high that video exists of the whole encounter and if that's the case I'll wait until it comes out to make a call on this.
let us not forget:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hofstra-? -sex-tape-student-saved-from-criminal-charges/
-
konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
It is everywhere in the country. The problem with this is that I highly doubt many of the people that watched it knew it was a 15 year old girl or that any of the male participants were underage. Again, you can't be charged for a crime where something happened without you knowing.
But... if you really wanna talk about it, everyone that intentionally viewed the R Kelly ? tape should be brought up on CP charges. -
MFs be doing all kind of ? outside, including running trains, and I gotta be responsible because I saw the ? ? Nah, I ain't feeling that. Might look at some ? and go right about my business.
I wonder how those same people, who want those laws, would feel if a crowd of people see a cop beating the ? out of somebody and decides to beat the ? out of the cop, would be cool with it ?
And even if they did, I still wouldn't want that kind of law. -
It's illegal to fight, without a permit, so everyone that ever watched a Worldstar video needs to go to jail.
-
ghostdog56 wrote: »Was it an actual ? or did that girl just let a bunch of ? run a train on her?
first of all, she's 15.
second...Since then, the teen has been reunited with her mother. She is being treated in a hospital.
ay, I wanna see justice just like anybody else if its a ?
but that number has nothing to do with the truth
? goes on every day....j/s
True... she could be just your average well-adjusted 9th grader that just happens to be into consensual rough broadcasted ? that lands her in the hospital.
Its not likely but its plausible if we're being honest
everybody's world aint the same -
konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
Was about to say this.
No need to create a new law. The facts of this alone are enough for child pornography charge. -
konceptjones wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
It is everywhere in the country. The problem with this is that I highly doubt many of the people that watched it knew it was a 15 year old girl or that any of the male participants were underage. Again, you can't be charged for a crime where something happened without you knowing.
But... if you really wanna talk about it, everyone that intentionally viewed the R Kelly ? tape should be brought up on CP charges.[/q every black woman? -
blackgod813 wrote: »
every black woman?konceptjones wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
It is everywhere in the country. The problem with this is that I highly doubt many of the people that watched it knew it was a 15 year old girl or that any of the male participants were underage. Again, you can't be charged for a crime where something happened without you knowing.
But... if you really wanna talk about it, everyone that intentionally viewed the R Kelly ? tape should be brought up on CP charges.
I fail to see how the viewers sex has anything to do with whether or not they need to be brought up on CP charges... -
konceptjones wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
It is everywhere in the country. The problem with this is that I highly doubt many of the people that watched it knew it was a 15 year old girl or that any of the male participants were underage. Again, you can't be charged for a crime where something happened without you knowing.
But... if you really wanna talk about it, everyone that intentionally viewed the R Kelly ? tape should be brought up on CP charges.
i agree.
either you think watching child porn should be illegal or you don't. are you saying you think it's no big deal?
wasn't that girl 14? -
konceptjones wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »1st and foremost - if they ? her, they deserve to be dealt with. And streaming that ? is additional fuckery.
But the way they focus the title of the article on the people who watched it isn't by accident. I think they're trying to push for some legal blame on the so-called viewers. Similar to the thread I posted before California assemblyman wants to criminalize recording violent crime.
More and more you notice people calling out the people who record ? , or watch ? - I won't be surprised to see them try to make a law if one doesn't already exist.
the problem in a case like this is that unless one of the participants actually says "we rapin this chick" during the live stream, no one who views it knows that they're watching a crime being committed. As far as they know it's a chick lettin dudes run a train on her. You cannot be held accountable for a crime you didn't participate in or were unaware of. Just like you can't be held accountable for a ? robbin the liquor store in front of you you can't be held accountable for watching some ? go down.
I'm pretty sure watching child porn is still illegal in Chicago though.
It is everywhere in the country. The problem with this is that I highly doubt many of the people that watched it knew it was a 15 year old girl or that any of the male participants were underage. Again, you can't be charged for a crime where something happened without you knowing.
But... if you really wanna talk about it, everyone that intentionally viewed the R Kelly ? tape should be brought up on CP charges.
i agree.
either you think watching child porn should be illegal or you don't. are you saying you think it's no big deal?
wasn't that girl 14?
What I'm saying is that if folks on here wanna try to turn this into a CP case for the 40 people that watched it and likely didn't know that some of the people involved were underage, then everyone that intentionally sought out and subsequently viewed the R Kelly ? tape needs to be brought up on those same charges 'cause they all knew the age of the girl involved and still watched it anyways. -
Chicago was and is worse than both those cities during those timesTrust me they will face Chicago out like they did New York from the 70-90s LA like 80s-00s and Chicago is next. -
Neophyte Wolfgang wrote: »
Chicago was and is worse than both those cities during those timesTrust me they will face Chicago out like they did New York from the 70-90s LA like 80s-00s and Chicago is next.
Nah them dummies just can't stop recording themselves and lettin everybody know how ? their city is. So the whole country just keep gettin Chicago savage notifications on their timelines. I can't speak for New York but LA in the early 90s was very similar
I remember our house having multiple bullet holes through windows and walls, thankfully we were always gone when it went down. And whenever we visited Gmoms in Compton for for holidays/family functions, just about every time there would be a shooting outside at some point in the day.
We'd be laughing and joking and ? and wouldn't even break when it went down, we just ran in the house and got down on the floor and still laughing and jokin and playin because it happened so much -
Nah them dummies just can't stop recording themselves and lettin everybody know how ? their city is. So the whole country just keep gettin Chicago savage notifications on their timelines. I can't speak for New York but LA in the early 90s was very similar
I remember our house having multiple bullet holes through windows and walls, thankfully we were always gone when it went down. And whenever we visited Gmoms in Compton for for holidays/family functions, just about every time there would be a shooting outside at some point in the day.
We'd be laughing and joking and ? and wouldn't even break when it went down, we just ran in the house and got down on the floor and still laughing and jokin and playin because it happened so much
Chicago nations ran themselves like a mafia, they tried best as possible to move in silence. This generation of snapchat, facebook, instagram changed the game. These young kids are dummies. As for as comparing violence, I'm just going by the numbers. NY and LA have double triple Chicago population. NY has 7-8 million people? LA 4 million, Chicago sitting at 2 1/2. Per capita Chicago was more violent than both cities, but that's not the point.
All Major cities crime dropped in the mid 90s Chicago, LA, NY, Houston, ETC.....Chicago stated to rise again in 2012.....an anomaly, 1 becuz chicago is heavy gentrified and they tore down all the projects. So that's not working -
Neophyte Wolfgang wrote: »Nah them dummies just can't stop recording themselves and lettin everybody know how ? their city is. So the whole country just keep gettin Chicago savage notifications on their timelines. I can't speak for New York but LA in the early 90s was very similar
I remember our house having multiple bullet holes through windows and walls, thankfully we were always gone when it went down. And whenever we visited Gmoms in Compton for for holidays/family functions, just about every time there would be a shooting outside at some point in the day.
We'd be laughing and joking and ? and wouldn't even break when it went down, we just ran in the house and got down on the floor and still laughing and jokin and playin because it happened so much
Chicago stated to rise again in 2012.....an anomaly, 1 becuz chicago is heavy gentrified and they tore down all the projects. So that's not working
Them tearing down the projects and scattering all the gangbangers across the street from each other is one of the main causes of whats been going on here. -
myth, most gangbangers were moved to surrounding suburbs, and even the ones who did move usually flipped to the gang neighborhood they moved in.Them tearing down the projects and scattering all the gangbangers across the street from each other is one of the main causes of whats been going on here.
The real cause is all the old heads getting hit by RICO and the shorties have no guidance, thats atleast a part of it.... -
Neophyte Wolfgang wrote: »
myth, most gangbangers were moved to surrounding suburbs, and even the ones who did move usually flipped to the gang neighborhood they moved in.Them tearing down the projects and scattering all the gangbangers across the street from each other is one of the main causes of whats been going on here.
The real cause is all the old heads getting hit by RICO and the shorties have no guidance, thats atleast a part of it....
I personally knew ppl from diff families that was from cabrini that lived out west after they tore it down. And their extended fam/friends lived in the city. I know another dude that lives out south that says the same about ppl from the projects being scattered thru out the city n it leading to violence.
I dont have the numbers but i doubt its just a myth.
And there not being any leaders is another factor that i agree. -
reminds me of the Kitty Genovese case. the bystander effect is real.
-
? apologists are WOAT
