WWE PPV thread - WWE Clash of Champions [AJ Styles vs. Jinder Mahal] - Dec. 17
Options
Comments
-
first Kobe now taker man damn
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »
It's been real Taker. I've been watching him since as far back as I can remember. Gonna be stange watching the WWE without him. It's like the Spurs without Duncan. That void's always gonna be there.
Rest...In....Peace
What?? He only showed up around mania ? actin like he was there every week -
I don't want to see taker until the HOF
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »
It's been real Taker. I've been watching him since as far back as I can remember. Gonna be stange watching the WWE without him. It's like the Spurs without Duncan. That void's always gonna be there.
Rest...In....Peace
What?? He only showed up around mania ? actin like he was there every week
I aint been a regular viewer of WWE programming in years, so for me he's always apart of the E even tho he's only been a part time part timer. -
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »
It's been real Taker. I've been watching him since as far back as I can remember. Gonna be stange watching the WWE without him. It's like the Spurs without Duncan. That void's always gonna be there.
Rest...In....Peace
What?? He only showed up around mania ? actin like he was there every week
when did you start watching wwe? 2011? -
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »1st half of Mania 8.5 outta 10
2nd half of Mania 5.5 outta 10
Everything after Seth/Triple H was just ok.
I'm legit ? about Wyatt vs Orton. That was another Ambrose vs Lesnar match. I was disappointed by that but everything else was good.
-
Already Home_17 wrote: »PanchoYoSancho wrote: »
It's been real Taker. I've been watching him since as far back as I can remember. Gonna be stange watching the WWE without him. It's like the Spurs without Duncan. That void's always gonna be there.
Rest...In....Peace
What?? He only showed up around mania ? actin like he was there every week
when did you start watching wwe? 2011?
Since the 90s, lets not act like taker wasnt on part time status the past few years, him showing up any other time outside of mania was suprsing -
I would like to see wm 35 go to 3 different cities like they did at wm2
-
So much for Taker saying he's back last survivor series
-
Someone a while back made a tribute video to the undertaker. This is the song they need to use for his HOF video
https://youtu.be/yuoiC-aZJrI -
Pretty ? up but it was his time to go. He's been waiting for a hip surgery for almost a year now. The WWE ? up with the whole Sting vs Taker angle cause that would've been the ultimate draw. No argument. He's gotta go though. It was funny cause I was watching this video where Booker T, HHH, Rock, hell even Vince McMahon came outta the back to try to get Taker to do a Spinnaroonie lmao.
-
Already Home_17 wrote: »PanchoYoSancho wrote: »
It's been real Taker. I've been watching him since as far back as I can remember. Gonna be stange watching the WWE without him. It's like the Spurs without Duncan. That void's always gonna be there.
Rest...In....Peace
What?? He only showed up around mania ? actin like he was there every week
when did you start watching wwe? 2011?
Since the 90s, lets not act like taker wasnt on part time status the past few years, him showing up any other time outside of mania was suprsing
part-time means we still see him a few times a year
not anymore
he's officially retired
and although we knew it was coming, it's surreal
dudes been a constant since most of us started watching, and he's part of the reason why we became fans of the product to begin with
i think that was his point -
That match wasn't so boring man. It's like whenever I start to like Roman he just drops the ball. And he way WWE books him makes it worse. really should have been Cena and taker
-
-
-
Roman was the right choice. Cena didn't need it, Brock didn't need it, HHH probably wouldn't have even wanted to do it so the only person with any credibility is Roman and it was well.
They didn't book Roman tp be superman, instead, they booked Undertaker to throw some big moves but he Roman survived. If Taker had hit Roman with 2-3 Tombstones people would have lost their mind. So instead booking Taker like Flair at WM 26 was a good move. -
I finally got to my car. Smh I'm in my feelings about takers last match. I'll give y'all the run down in the morning. I gotta hit up Waffle House and get some sleep
-
-
Pretty ? up but it was his time to go. He's been waiting for a hip surgery for almost a year now. The WWE ? up with the whole Sting vs Taker angle cause that would've been the ultimate draw. No argument. He's gotta go though. It was funny cause I was watching this video where Booker T, HHH, Rock, hell even Vince McMahon came outta the back to try to get Taker to do a Spinnaroonie lmao.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JS3_ND_suw -
Roman was the right choice. Cena didn't need it, Brock didn't need it, HHH probably wouldn't have even wanted to do it so the only person with any credibility is Roman and it was well.
They didn't book Roman tp be superman, instead, they booked Undertaker to throw some big moves but he Roman survived. If Taker had hit Roman with 2-3 Tombstones people would have lost their mind. So instead booking Taker like Flair at WM 26 was a good move.
If the match was going to be ? regardless (which it was) it should've been Kane and they both retire.
Roman didn't need to/deserve to be in this, but this is what Taker and Vince wanted so whatever. -
Roman was the right choice. Cena didn't need it, Brock didn't need it, HHH probably wouldn't have even wanted to do it so the only person with any credibility is Roman and it was well.
They didn't book Roman tp be superman, instead, they booked Undertaker to throw some big moves but he Roman survived. If Taker had hit Roman with 2-3 Tombstones people would have lost their mind. So instead booking Taker like Flair at WM 26 was a good move.
If the match was going to be ? regardless (which it was) it should've been Kane and they both retire.
Roman didn't need to/deserve to be in this, but this is what Taker and Vince wanted so whatever.
Nobody trying to watchi....never mind I just noticed who I'm responding to. Carry on. -
Roman was the right choice. Cena didn't need it, Brock didn't need it, HHH probably wouldn't have even wanted to do it so the only person with any credibility is Roman and it was well.
They didn't book Roman tp be superman, instead, they booked Undertaker to throw some big moves but he Roman survived. If Taker had hit Roman with 2-3 Tombstones people would have lost their mind. So instead booking Taker like Flair at WM 26 was a good move.
If the match was going to be ? regardless (which it was) it should've been Kane and they both retire.
Roman didn't need to/deserve to be in this, but this is what Taker and Vince wanted so whatever.
Nobody trying to watchi....never mind I just noticed who I'm responding to. Carry on.
Bruh we just saw the worst Mania ME in years, Roman couldnt even lift Taker. But go ahead and keep defending whatever the E does ? -
infamous114 wrote: »
I marked out. I didn't expect them at all. WWE raised the Hardyz. This is where they belong. -
Am i the only one who finds it weird ESPN showing WWE highlights
