George Zimmerman Trial Thread (Found Not Guilty Jesus help us...)
Options
Comments
-
this snitchy ass ? ...rofl......
-
Look yall can lock fat mf up
Just let aaron hernandez cook -
"He never said 'Pardon my language'."
LOL. -
lol, maybe he wanted to take a smoke break and realized he had no more newports in the box
"? " -
Riots are not going to happen. They would have happened already, people have forgotten about this case already
-
sooooo trayvon armed himself with the ground?
okay....
if people have doubt that martin could cause life-threatening injuries on his own, doesn't it make sense to throw out a method in which martin could have caused life-threatening injuries. smashing a head on concrete falls into that category. the ground can qualify as a deadly weapon. that sort of thing has held up in court before. -
Gotdayum. All of that over "? ".
-
sooooo trayvon armed himself with the ground?
okay....
if people have doubt that martin could cause life-threatening injuries on his own, doesn't it make sense to throw out a method in which martin could have caused life-threatening injuries. smashing a head on concrete falls into that category. the ground can qualify as a deadly weapon. that sort of thing has held up in court before.
that's going under the assumption that trayvonn had an intent to ? zimmerman with the ground once the ground became a factor....however that's weak at best especially considering that zimmerman walked into the altercation with a deadly weapon armed and ready to go from the jump..
before they came together, you can't prove that trayvonn planned on using the ground as a deadly weapon if the opportunity presented itself....but it's already proved that zimmerman planned on using the gun once he had his oppertunity -
Feelings will ensue.
-
sooooo trayvon armed himself with the ground?
okay....
if people have doubt that martin could cause life-threatening injuries on his own, doesn't it make sense to throw out a method in which martin could have caused life-threatening injuries. smashing a head on concrete falls into that category. the ground can qualify as a deadly weapon. that sort of thing has held up in court before.
that's going under the assumption that trayvonn had an intent to ? zimmerman with the ground once the ground became a factor....however that's weak at best especially considering that zimmerman walked into the altercation with a deadly weapon armed and ready to go from the jump..
before they came together, you can't prove that trayvonn planned on using the ground as a deadly weapon if the opportunity presented itself....but it's already proved that zimmerman planned on using the gun once he had his oppertunity
i wasn't expecting a thoughtful, coherent response from you. i'm at a loss. carry on. -
Easy response, "I did not expect an altercation. I had no intention for violence to occur."; then he would claim that Treyvon started the fight.that's sketchy as ? though...
i mean there's a reason why police will taze a person versus shooting them... you use the force the pertains to the threat.....
by carrying a gun and no other means of defending oneself it's reasonable to say that zimmerman was prepared to use lethal force against any physical threat.....if that can be established..then his approach of trayvon means that he was approaching him in full expectation of using lethal force if the altercation got outta hand at any time....which it did....and he did....
i mean it may be a hypothetical question that would send the defense crazy, but i would ask george zimmerman would he have approached trayvon if he didn't know he had the gun on him.....
even if the question gets thrown out the jury can't unhear the ? -
I swear if this ? Zimmerman gets off, I'm throwin somethin at somethin...
Something big at something important too, I'm ? furious right now
-
fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....
as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....
and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...
dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the ? was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....
so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to ? this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
Easy response, "I did not expect an altercation. I had no intention for violence to occur."; then he would claim that Treyvon started the fight.that's sketchy as ? though...
i mean there's a reason why police will taze a person versus shooting them... you use the force the pertains to the threat.....
by carrying a gun and no other means of defending oneself it's reasonable to say that zimmerman was prepared to use lethal force against any physical threat.....if that can be established..then his approach of trayvon means that he was approaching him in full expectation of using lethal force if the altercation got outta hand at any time....which it did....and he did....
i mean it may be a hypothetical question that would send the defense crazy, but i would ask george zimmerman would he have approached trayvon if he didn't know he had the gun on him.....
even if the question gets thrown out the jury can't unhear the ?
so why bring the gun? and why approach when the police were on their way? -
-
"I have a concealed carry license, so I carried the gun everywhere I was legally permitted."; then he'd say he approached Treyvon because he looked suspicious.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
Easy response, "I did not expect an altercation. I had no intention for violence to occur."; then he would claim that Treyvon started the fight.that's sketchy as ? though...
i mean there's a reason why police will taze a person versus shooting them... you use the force the pertains to the threat.....
by carrying a gun and no other means of defending oneself it's reasonable to say that zimmerman was prepared to use lethal force against any physical threat.....if that can be established..then his approach of trayvon means that he was approaching him in full expectation of using lethal force if the altercation got outta hand at any time....which it did....and he did....
i mean it may be a hypothetical question that would send the defense crazy, but i would ask george zimmerman would he have approached trayvon if he didn't know he had the gun on him.....
even if the question gets thrown out the jury can't unhear the ?
so why bring the gun? and why approach when the police were on their way? -
so then they ask him was he prepared to use it....
even if he says no....he did use it.....
so by definition of him using it, it shows that he was prepared to use it once he approached trayvon...
when he got out of the car he knew that the outcome of this approach could possibly end with trayvon dying.....
we cannot say the same fro trayvon because he did not begin this altercation with a deadly weapon on him....
-
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
"I have a concealed carry license, so I carried the gun everywhere I was legally permitted."; then he'd say he approached Treyvon because he looked suspicious.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
Easy response, "I did not expect an altercation. I had no intention for violence to occur."; then he would claim that Treyvon started the fight.that's sketchy as ? though...
i mean there's a reason why police will taze a person versus shooting them... you use the force the pertains to the threat.....
by carrying a gun and no other means of defending oneself it's reasonable to say that zimmerman was prepared to use lethal force against any physical threat.....if that can be established..then his approach of trayvon means that he was approaching him in full expectation of using lethal force if the altercation got outta hand at any time....which it did....and he did....
i mean it may be a hypothetical question that would send the defense crazy, but i would ask george zimmerman would he have approached trayvon if he didn't know he had the gun on him.....
even if the question gets thrown out the jury can't unhear the ?
so why bring the gun? and why approach when the police were on their way?
Which ultimately proves the prosecution was right when they said he profiled him. -
You're over-thinking it bruh.fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....
as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....
and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...
dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the ? was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....
so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to ? this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them
You don't wait for the ? to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.
That's the concept this law is based on. -
Damn. What does this ? remember?
-
Zimmerman saying his life was in danger would be as if Zod said if his life was in danger and so he had to wipe out the human populace and create a second krypton.
-
so then they ask him was he prepared to use it....
even if he says no....he did use it.....
so by definition of him using it, it shows that he was prepared to use it once he approached trayvon...
when he got out of the car he knew that the outcome of this approach could possibly end with trayvon dying.....
we cannot say the same fro trayvon because he did not begin this altercation with a deadly weapon on him....
but how are you going to get the answer to that question? Preparing to use it if he was in danger is different than preparing to use it just b/c he can -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
You're over-thinking it bruh.fiat is doing a great job at pointing out the technicalities of florida law..however the defense already established a flaw....
as fiat said, the law says all zimmerman has to prove HE THOUGHT his life was in danger....yet his attorney is trying t o prove that his life WAS in danger.....
and unfortunately for zimmerman the only way for them to prove that zimmerman's life was actually in danger was for him to have been damaged more than he was...
dude didn't even have to go directly to the hospital...they entertained it...but ultimately it was determined he'd be iight....it's not like the ? was life threatening....ya feel me? not life threatening....
so the jury is going to have to believe that trayvon really intended to ? this man......and i don't see anyone buying that...especially considering zimmerman had the gun from the jump...he was fully prepared to shoot if needed be..trayvon just wanted to know why he was being followed..he could have jumped off of zimmerman and ran for all we know...but we don't know cuz zimmerman who was prepared to shoot..shot first......knowing mind you that the police were on their way....because he called them
You don't wait for the ? to mortally injure you to do what you can to stop him, you try to stop him before it gets that far.
That's the concept this law is based on.
there was no indication that it was ever going to get that far is what i'm attempting to prove...dude jumped the gun literally because he walked in there prepared to shoot at the first sign of trouble -
Ajackson17 wrote: »Zimmerman saying his life was in danger would be as if Zod said if his life was in danger and so he had to wipe out the human populace and create a second krypton.
Wow! You used a superman fictional movie to break this down? smh
-
so then they ask him was he prepared to use it....
even if he says no....he did use it.....
so by definition of him using it, it shows that he was prepared to use it once he approached trayvon...
when he got out of the car he knew that the outcome of this approach could possibly end with trayvon dying.....
we cannot say the same fro trayvon because he did not begin this altercation with a deadly weapon on him....
but how are you going to get the answer to that question? Preparing to use it if he was in danger is different than preparing to use it just b/c he can
"'when you left the car to approach trayvon martin, were you prepared to use your fire arm?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpFITa9eYoQ
This discussion has been closed.