Marcus Garvey and ?
Options
Comments
-
Lol @ doesn't accept science......
? , I drop the most scientific ? these boards have ever seen......
Strictly because of personal beliefs (and not any factual based arguments) you can't even accept one of the biggest, most well known, well substantiated theories of the 19th-21st centuries; not only do you not accept it based on beliefs but ignorance of the theory in itself and most if not all subjects and observations surrounding it.
LOL @ you saying my theories can't hold up to scientific scrutiny when your creation theories (you have yet to thoroughly explain btw) can't hold weight against the very scientific theories you deny. But you wanna act like a scientist.. foh -
? please.....
But yet, in every thread I'm the only ? dropping science.....
I have detailed all of my threads ......
You stay getting schooled..... -
? please.....
But yet, in every thread I'm the only ? dropping science.....
I have detailed all of my threads ......
You stay getting schooled.....
What I'm saying is you oppose certain scientific theories like evolution but make no well-detailed or thorough arguments based on science against them.
On the contrary, I've schooled you countless times, one being on the topic of vestigial structures. Before that debate, you were confused as to what vestigial actually meant. You were confused about speciation. Not to mention I destroyed you in the S.L. debates and ganked your title. -
Ajackson17 wrote: »Can't you ? just intellectually battle and leave the pettiness away.
I try but I'm always bombarded with feelings from negroes who can't control their emotions. The evidence is here. -
The threads exist.............
Anyone who read knows............
LOL @ you taking anything from the ? ...................
Young_Chitlin → bambu
When you debating buttuh b for the IC's best debater title?
June 28 Comment
***The peoples champ***
-
Young Chitlin didn't even vote in that thread. He must not have been a witness to your annihilation. If I recall correctly, the only vote you received was from AJackson. Even the mods embarrassed you.
-
I voted for you @oceanic , like I said he was fiddling around for the most part, it wasn't the best debate, only if it jumped right from the beginning, then it would really great. I felt it could have been better, but too much filler.
-
LOL.. Then @bambu received 0 votes. Pathetic..
-
I embarrassed the mods......
Again, the thread exists......
And chitlin saw that thread......
He is just spitting the truth.....
Your argument was borrowed......
A no-no in debates.......
And I see that the edit stamp is retro active.......
Further illustrating your unethical & quasi-? nature....
And now I am wondering what your relationship with sion is......
You got this ? locking and sticking your ? in a room that he doesn't even moderate......
Sounds ? ........
N/h @ your quasi-homosexual relationship with the " mods "......
-
-
Don't cry.
-
-
LOL.. Then @bambu received 0 votes. Pathetic..
And is still recognized as the undisputed champion.......
Must make you look and feel quite stupid......
-
LOL.. by one person that
1.) Wasn't there
2.) Wasn't holding the debates.
If anything, it makes me feel more intelligent than @bambu
-
If you want your title back, you better ask me nicely.
-
Chitlin is one of the founders of that debate series.....
And one of the most respected posters on this site........
And its not just him ? -boy..........
Young_Chitlin
Young_Chitlin → bambu
When you debating buttuh b for the IC's best debater title?
Flag
June 28 Comment
CC_Poncho
CC_Poncho
You spelled cc_poncho wrong. It's cool though, I forgive
June 28
Young_Chitlin
Young_Chitlin
Poncho I'll debate you for the #1 contenders spot
June 28
bambu
bambu
I'm always game.......
However.....
I wouldn't be any good on some of these new school hip-hop issues.........
The ? is golden-era biased............
June 28 Delete
Young_Chitlin
Young_Chitlin
It would be a debate on something both of you are familiar with
June 28
MissK
MissK
look forward to reading
June 29
How about you stop now before you have to go running to your boyfriend sion for protection...........
-
LOL @ that convo referring to the reason debates
-
And as expected, you can clearly see @bambu trying to avoid a debate topic..
LOL @ "the ? is golden era biased". 35 and still posting on the IC? Ugghh -
Dumb ? ............
That is about a unification match.....................
For the IC championship...........
But whats up with you and Sion tho'...................
-
And as expected, you can clearly see @bambu trying to avoid a debate topic..
LOL @ "the ? is golden era biased". 35 and still posting on the IC? Ugghh
His age has nothing to do with it 35 year olds post here for the same reasons they watch tv. -
^^^ feelings. You don't have to explain yourself to me. -
I never told you my age.....
Stop following me around, ? .....
However.....
I should have carded y'all ? so that I wouldn't get involved with debating an infant.....
-
? does not murder he kills there is a huge difference
Any killing done by a supreme being is arguably unlawful and as such can be labeled murder.buddha adandoned his only son
Back then in ancient times, the journey he took was comparable to going off to college in today's time. He did not abandon his son. On Gautama's return, Rahula was educated in the teachings through his father.
Christ never returned
He was born a prince and therefore he had a responsibility BUT he chose not to accept IT he ran from it.
He was Prince when he left and was Prince when he returned.Buddha whole teaching can be summed up as being the rejection of desire this is a ? stupid teaching.
You misunderstand. As you've said, it is the desire to do good that enhances life so if what you say is true, there would be no Buddhahood to obtain. What Buddhism teaches is the repudiation of desire for permanence. The root of suffering lies in that desire.. and craving, which is the desire for more than what is necessary at present.
In christian theology no one ever really dies what we call death is simply the removal of the soul from the body. christ did not have a wife or son to return to. Buddha was only a prince by title he preformed none of his responsibility but keep on making excuses for bhudda being a deadbeat father and coward.
The concept of the repudiation of desire is deceptively evil, mankind needs desire and craving acceptance of the world as it is and the ability to deal with it in a positive way is what makes you a better person. in other words learn to deal with your nature so that you can change it and be reborn, pretending that you can escape life and attain buddhahood is simply another way of saying run away.
There is no buddhahood no enlightenment you meditate in vain. -
You told me about how you got ran out of yo spot by some young ? in one of these recent threads. When you said "young ? " I figured you have to be 30+
I just added 5 years to 30 for comedic effect.. -
^^^ feelings. You don't have to explain yourself to me.
Feelings for what?? it's the truth.
