Bill Gates: There's no scientific explanation of how it (the universe) came about!
Options
Comments
-
"Listen--science and technology rules our world and it will continue to do so.Mankind has come so far not because of religion;
Science,free thinkers,and technology has brought us this far.While some black men look for answers in religion, the white man look for solutions in science.
Religion almost always stiffles free thought and innovation.Religion controls and instills fear;religous types have monopolise morality and preach religious hatred Religion want to keep you in the dark,in your cocoon. Science on the other hand liberates the very best of human ingenuity by means of reasoning, experimentation,exploration and adventurism"
History says otherwise it was religion that put the european on the track to rule the world not science the same goes for the arab.
I guess same religion that put the mighty empires before the europeans/arabians huh?
-
"Listen--science and technology rules our world and it will continue to do so.Mankind has come so far not because of religion;
Science,free thinkers,and technology has brought us this far.While some black men look for answers in religion, the white man look for solutions in science.
Religion almost always stiffles free thought and innovation.Religion controls and instills fear;religous types have monopolise morality and preach religious hatred Religion want to keep you in the dark,in your cocoon. Science on the other hand liberates the very best of human ingenuity by means of reasoning, experimentation,exploration and adventurism"
History says otherwise it was religion that put the european on the track to rule the world not science the same goes for the arab.
I guess same religion that put the mighty empires before the europeans/arabians huh?
All the empire of old All of them had strong religious followers egypt,rome, greece the mongols, ming china all founded on religion and they did not have a problem with religion and technology.
Hatred of religion and ? as a concept is a european concept, no other people in history that i am aware of had this problem. Europeans a few centuries ago started to look back on how their ancestors misused religion for evil and some decided that ? /religion was evil therfore they set out to convince everybody Because that's what europeans do try to control everything. -
^^^Like i said previously, every race/group of people have had their ? , why must I an Ashanti accept an Israelite ? ?
-
MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »If you cannot understand why ? is not male nor female in the so called christian faith then you need to do some more study. We only use "he" figuratively ? not being male or female is stated very clearly in genesis and later on in the new testament
Or maybe you take your own or another preacher's opinion as the literal word of ? .
If we were made in ? 's image then what was ? if the bible has always referred to him as a "He"? Not just as The Spirit but as "He"
You're reading into it too much. There wouldn't be a need for the "man is made in his image" part if that was the case.
Also I guess u forgot the part where ? was physically described in the Scriptures. Or do u wanna ignore that just to support your own THEORY instead of actual Facts?
You're starting to lose it, walk away from the computer now so you'll be able to sleep tonight, tomorrow's Monday so that means the weekend is over.
Do you want me to quote from the bible?? because i can do that the only reason i have not already is because i don't want the thread to be moved. ? is a spirit i suggest you do some more reading and more importantly thinking
Oh how tha mighty fall and resort to Trolling and off-tracking.
I never said that HE wasn't a spirit so don't go getting your ? hard on Me becuz somebody agreed with You.
The Bible says that ALL Scripture is true and not SOME of it. It even made a point to remark that.
You're just like a lot of people. U try to make ? and Jesus into something that's easier for u to digest and understand instead of just taking HIM for who HE is and just letting HIM cook.
That's a problem all in itself tho. People want ? and Jesus to be who they want them to be instead of them just being Thyselves.
? has said described his nature and it's not limited to male or female that is basic bible study 101 but people have made ? male to support misogyny. The "He" as a term for ? is used because of the inadequacy of human language AND THE bible indicates that were ? is there is no male or female. Please keep studying the bible at least then you can make a more informed argument about it's fundamental doctrines.
Who said anything about ? being limited? I know better than that. U should too...
And nobody is pressing for mysogony. again, people want ? and Jesus to be what they're more comfortable with and not for who they truly are. Nobody has ever said Life is going to be fair or that all beings are equal by general comparison. If ? was reffered to as a She then we would call ? a She. Conspiracize much?
I can tell you're wearing yourself thin, you're running out of ammunition. How can u ever learn anything if u know everything?
I'm not saying that I've got it in better with ? becuz I accept HIM for what HE is and what HE does so don't take it like that. But I'll never take Man's ideas over ? 's word just becuz I would rather fantasize about a better life or speculate why what is and what isn't or what could be. Then I'd be trusting and more believing of Mankind more than ? HIMSELF.
LOOK IF YOU SAY ? IS A man when the bible says he is a spirit then you a limiting his nature i am not fighting you nor do i care much about our debate because it is clear to me that you don't know much about what is written about the nature of ? .
JOHN 4: 24 ? IS SPIRIT
GENESIS 1:27 SO ? CREATED MAN IN HIS OWN IMAGE MALE AND FEMALE HE CREATED THEM.
You're very stand off'ish and come across as a little Bratty. What you posted doesn't really make u right and me wrong.
But uh, if Adam was made first and Eve was created from Adam and she was Second. Then wouldn't that mean Adam looks more like ? and Eve looks more like Adam? So in turn since Eve looks like Adam who was created first then doesn't Adam who was created first (in ? 's image) look like ? ?
what is the image of a spirit ? and do you think it would be physical ?
-
MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »"Why do the black man continue to believe some ? given to him by his master? Despite all the noise,the white man who introduced the so-called word of ? to the black man do not abide by it.
And he don't need to since it would be of no help to him in terms of his personal and economic development. Perhaps some people seek refuge in the worship of a ? because they want something for nothing"
I guess the person who made this quote isn't hip as to why ? destroyed Egypt and all of the other Nations and at times the Jews as well.
We don't make the rules, ? does. That's the truth people can't handle. So they mock him or question him and what he's done.
Yea it's his rules, his games and no one can or will win.
Why u mad doe? It'll be ight bruh. I used to feel the same way u did (literally) but then I had saw that Jesus was with me this whole time and I see clearer now and I feel better about Life.
Mad? Naa bruh! I was born into the church (Presbyterian-Methodist) Worship was held in my house Sunday (2x), wednesday and friday....i could've used that time doing things i enjoyed. I've read the Bible 3x from beginning to the end...Proverbs are what made me realize the discrepancy cos even folklore passed down within my cluture (Ashanti) believe in a higher power but most definitely not Christ/Yahweh as made out to be.
Every civilization that has ever existed has had their ? , and only the African has denounced theirs for some white faced ? of the Israelites smh.
Reread The Old Testament and you'll know why most of Africa has always held the short end of the stick.
And Jesus wasn't White, he wasn't darkskinned either. That's an issue or a misunderstanding that a lot of Black People have about Jesus. Dude was the same color as a typical very lightly sun burnt Arab becuz u know, that's the part of the planet where he was put on from n ? . All of that Black Jesus stuff is nothing but displaced pride. Becuz technically he wasn't Black or White, he was Brown (like most people have always been since the beginning of time)
And nobody ever said All Christian Followers & Groups were "perfect" so I'm not mad at u about White Jesus but ever since I found him I've been on a better track to doing better in life and I'm not as mad at the world as I used to be. So for what that's worth to u I hope it shows u that u aren't alone in this world. -
^^^Like i said previously, every race/group of people have had their ? , why must I an Ashanti accept an Israelite ? ?
The israelite ? does not want you to accept him if you don't want too if you cannot see that this ? is the REAL AND ONLY ? then that is fine. It's when atheist fight against the faith that problems and 20 page threads like this one are created. A religious person feels commanded to tell people about their ? .
a real atheist can just fall back but sooooo many of you don't do that you continue to agitate theist for no reason and most of you don't understand what you are disputing. -
MansaMusa67 wrote: »That fish is not synonymous That with Christianity biblically. That stems from the introduction of pagan symbols and customs into the Catholic Church.
Yes it is. Jesus was peddling fish and bread at the farmers market in Matthew 14
lol
You ain't bout to reel me in dog..
soon as I read this post, I was bout to be like "....WTF DOES THAT HAVE TO DO..."
Then it hit me...lol
-
^^^Like i said previously, every race/group of people have had their ? , why must I an Ashanti accept an Israelite ? ?
The israelite ? does not want you to accept him if you don't want too if you cannot see that this ? is the REAL AND ONLY ? then that is fine. It's when atheist fight against the faith that problems and 20 page threads like this one are created. A religious person feels commanded to tell people about their ? .
a real atheist can just fall back but sooooo many of you don't do that you continue to agitate theist for no reason and most of you don't understand what you are disputing.
And you can't possibly understand them either. I have my own ? so i'm good... -
MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »"Why do the black man continue to believe some ? given to him by his master? Despite all the noise,the white man who introduced the so-called word of ? to the black man do not abide by it.
And he don't need to since it would be of no help to him in terms of his personal and economic development. Perhaps some people seek refuge in the worship of a ? because they want something for nothing"
I guess the person who made this quote isn't hip as to why ? destroyed Egypt and all of the other Nations and at times the Jews as well.
We don't make the rules, ? does. That's the truth people can't handle. So they mock him or question him and what he's done.
Yea it's his rules, his games and no one can or will win.
Why u mad doe? It'll be ight bruh. I used to feel the same way u did (literally) but then I had saw that Jesus was with me this whole time and I see clearer now and I feel better about Life.
Mad? Naa bruh! I was born into the church (Presbyterian-Methodist) Worship was held in my house Sunday (2x), wednesday and friday....i could've used that time doing things i enjoyed. I've read the Bible 3x from beginning to the end...Proverbs are what made me realize the discrepancy cos even folklore passed down within my cluture (Ashanti) believe in a higher power but most definitely not Christ/Yahweh as made out to be.
Every civilization that has ever existed has had their ? , and only the African has denounced theirs for some white faced ? of the Israelites smh.
Reread The Old Testament and you'll know why most of Africa has always held the short end of the stick.
And Jesus wasn't White, he wasn't darkskinned either. That's an issue or a misunderstanding that a lot of Black People have about Jesus. Dude was the same color as a typical very lightly sun burnt Arab becuz u know, that's the part of the planet where he was put on from n ? . All of that Black Jesus stuff is nothing but displaced pride. Becuz technically he wasn't Black or White, he was Brown (like most people have always been since the beginning of time)
And nobody ever said All Christian Followers & Groups were "perfect" so I'm not mad at u about White Jesus but ever since I found him I've been on a better track to doing better in life and I'm not as mad at the world as I used to be. So for what that's worth to u I hope it shows u that u aren't alone in this world.
I wonder why ? will want jesus in egypt so herod won't find him easily -
MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »If you cannot understand why ? is not male nor female in the so called christian faith then you need to do some more study. We only use "he" figuratively ? not being male or female is stated very clearly in genesis and later on in the new testament
Or maybe you take your own or another preacher's opinion as the literal word of ? .
If we were made in ? 's image then what was ? if the bible has always referred to him as a "He"? Not just as The Spirit but as "He"
You're reading into it too much. There wouldn't be a need for the "man is made in his image" part if that was the case.
Also I guess u forgot the part where ? was physically described in the Scriptures. Or do u wanna ignore that just to support your own THEORY instead of actual Facts?
You're starting to lose it, walk away from the computer now so you'll be able to sleep tonight, tomorrow's Monday so that means the weekend is over.
Do you want me to quote from the bible?? because i can do that the only reason i have not already is because i don't want the thread to be moved. ? is a spirit i suggest you do some more reading and more importantly thinking
Oh how tha mighty fall and resort to Trolling and off-tracking.
I never said that HE wasn't a spirit so don't go getting your ? hard on Me becuz somebody agreed with You.
The Bible says that ALL Scripture is true and not SOME of it. It even made a point to remark that.
You're just like a lot of people. U try to make ? and Jesus into something that's easier for u to digest and understand instead of just taking HIM for who HE is and just letting HIM cook.
That's a problem all in itself tho. People want ? and Jesus to be who they want them to be instead of them just being Thyselves.
? has said described his nature and it's not limited to male or female that is basic bible study 101 but people have made ? male to support misogyny. The "He" as a term for ? is used because of the inadequacy of human language AND THE bible indicates that were ? is there is no male or female. Please keep studying the bible at least then you can make a more informed argument about it's fundamental doctrines.
Who said anything about ? being limited? I know better than that. U should too...
And nobody is pressing for mysogony. again, people want ? and Jesus to be what they're more comfortable with and not for who they truly are. Nobody has ever said Life is going to be fair or that all beings are equal by general comparison. If ? was reffered to as a She then we would call ? a She. Conspiracize much?
I can tell you're wearing yourself thin, you're running out of ammunition. How can u ever learn anything if u know everything?
I'm not saying that I've got it in better with ? becuz I accept HIM for what HE is and what HE does so don't take it like that. But I'll never take Man's ideas over ? 's word just becuz I would rather fantasize about a better life or speculate why what is and what isn't or what could be. Then I'd be trusting and more believing of Mankind more than ? HIMSELF.
LOOK IF YOU SAY ? IS A man when the bible says he is a spirit then you a limiting his nature i am not fighting you nor do i care much about our debate because it is clear to me that you don't know much about what is written about the nature of ? .
JOHN 4: 24 ? IS SPIRIT
GENESIS 1:27 SO ? CREATED MAN IN HIS OWN IMAGE MALE AND FEMALE HE CREATED THEM.
You're very stand off'ish and come across as a little Bratty. What you posted doesn't really make u right and me wrong.
But uh, if Adam was made first and Eve was created from Adam and she was Second. Then wouldn't that mean Adam looks more like ? and Eve looks more like Adam? So in turn since Eve looks like Adam who was created first then doesn't Adam who was created first (in ? 's image) look like ? ?
what is the image of a spirit ? and do you think it would be physical ?
Physical yes, of course. It also says so in the Bible.
Image (in my opinion I might add) - just going off of facts.
- Physically
- Mentally
- Emotionally
- Spiritually
All traits which we get from ? . Love, Frustration, Arms, Legs, Intellectual Thinking, Phrophesizing, a Head, Feet, etc etc.
I don't undermine the Alpha & Omega part but if Adam came first who's made in his image and Eve came second who's made to be just like Adam but just with another type of genitalia then how do u say that The Spirit doesn't look like Man?
If that was the case then why didn't he send his Daughter instead of his Son? The same thing would've happened
Why didn't Eve come first?
I don't make the rules or question them. I just do my best to follow them (willfully) & make him happy. I don't try to condense ? or get too literal just for my own more watered down comfortable selfish reasons for believing in ? .
-
MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »MoneyLuver wrote: »If you cannot understand why ? is not male nor female in the so called christian faith then you need to do some more study. We only use "he" figuratively ? not being male or female is stated very clearly in genesis and later on in the new testament
Or maybe you take your own or another preacher's opinion as the literal word of ? .
If we were made in ? 's image then what was ? if the bible has always referred to him as a "He"? Not just as The Spirit but as "He"
You're reading into it too much. There wouldn't be a need for the "man is made in his image" part if that was the case.
Also I guess u forgot the part where ? was physically described in the Scriptures. Or do u wanna ignore that just to support your own THEORY instead of actual Facts?
You're starting to lose it, walk away from the computer now so you'll be able to sleep tonight, tomorrow's Monday so that means the weekend is over.
Do you want me to quote from the bible?? because i can do that the only reason i have not already is because i don't want the thread to be moved. ? is a spirit i suggest you do some more reading and more importantly thinking
Oh how tha mighty fall and resort to Trolling and off-tracking.
I never said that HE wasn't a spirit so don't go getting your ? hard on Me becuz somebody agreed with You.
The Bible says that ALL Scripture is true and not SOME of it. It even made a point to remark that.
You're just like a lot of people. U try to make ? and Jesus into something that's easier for u to digest and understand instead of just taking HIM for who HE is and just letting HIM cook.
That's a problem all in itself tho. People want ? and Jesus to be who they want them to be instead of them just being Thyselves.
? has said described his nature and it's not limited to male or female that is basic bible study 101 but people have made ? male to support misogyny. The "He" as a term for ? is used because of the inadequacy of human language AND THE bible indicates that were ? is there is no male or female. Please keep studying the bible at least then you can make a more informed argument about it's fundamental doctrines.
Who said anything about ? being limited? I know better than that. U should too...
And nobody is pressing for mysogony. again, people want ? and Jesus to be what they're more comfortable with and not for who they truly are. Nobody has ever said Life is going to be fair or that all beings are equal by general comparison. If ? was reffered to as a She then we would call ? a She. Conspiracize much?
I can tell you're wearing yourself thin, you're running out of ammunition. How can u ever learn anything if u know everything?
I'm not saying that I've got it in better with ? becuz I accept HIM for what HE is and what HE does so don't take it like that. But I'll never take Man's ideas over ? 's word just becuz I would rather fantasize about a better life or speculate why what is and what isn't or what could be. Then I'd be trusting and more believing of Mankind more than ? HIMSELF.
LOOK IF YOU SAY ? IS A man when the bible says he is a spirit then you a limiting his nature i am not fighting you nor do i care much about our debate because it is clear to me that you don't know much about what is written about the nature of ? .
JOHN 4: 24 ? IS SPIRIT
GENESIS 1:27 SO ? CREATED MAN IN HIS OWN IMAGE MALE AND FEMALE HE CREATED THEM.
You're very stand off'ish and come across as a little Bratty. What you posted doesn't really make u right and me wrong.
But uh, if Adam was made first and Eve was created from Adam and she was Second. Then wouldn't that mean Adam looks more like ? and Eve looks more like Adam? So in turn since Eve looks like Adam who was created first then doesn't Adam who was created first (in ? 's image) look like ? ?
what is the image of a spirit ? and do you think it would be physical ?
Physical yes, of course. It also says so in the Bible.
Image (in my opinion I might add) - just going off of facts.
- Physically
- Mentally
- Emotionally
- Spiritually
All traits which we get from ? . Love, Frustration, Arms, Legs, Intellectual Thinking, Phrophesizing, a Head, Feet, etc etc.
I don't undermine the Alpha & Omega part but if Adam came first who's made in his image and Eve came second who's made to be just like Adam but just with another type of genitalia then how do u say that The Spirit doesn't look like Man?
If that was the case then why didn't he send his Daughter instead of his Son? The same thing would've happened
Why didn't Eve come first?
I don't make the rules or question them. I just do my best to follow them (willfully) & make him happy. I don't try to condense ? or get too literal just for my own more watered down comfortable selfish reasons for believing in ? .
The bible does not say that eve is made in adams image is says they are made in ? 's image both of them even through adam was made first.
? is a spirit and incarnates as whatever he wants too so it is improper to say that ? is a man rather it is better to say that ? can be a man or a burning push or anything he wishes. If you lock ? into any physical form you strip from him the fullness of his omnipotence. Through out the bible ? manifest both male and female traits but we call him father because that is the more active role. But ? is beyond gender.
If jesus was a female the entire bible would have been invalid
-
? is a male obviously because he dropped Jesus off on Mary and proceeded to become the world's worst deadbeat.
-
? is a male obviously because he dropped Jesus off on Mary and proceeded to become the world's worst deadbeat.
? convinced jospeh to stay with Mary provided them with gold, incense and myrrh and saved them from herod. -
yeah he let another man raise his son cuz he wasn't about that life -
Gold, incense and myrrh was like throwing him a pair of Jordans every year for Easter + child support
-
Gold, incense and myrrh was like throwing him a pair of Jordans every year for Easter + child support
GOLD is a luxury of the rich in the world today, it was even more so back then. i really can't take a buddhist bashing any religion serious. should you not be thinking about emptiness.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXg-MCv-YQQ -
so are Jordans -
nah, rahreem and jojo got jordans and they live in the projects, there is no luxury tax on jordans -
nah, rahreem and jojo got jordans and they live in the projects, there is no luxury tax on jordans
Rahreem and Jojo ain't got nothing to do with ? though. ? only showered his son with material items, like Jordans. He didn't raise him though and teach him how to be a real nugga -
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »You guys are funny w all the evolution nonsense like, "pigs don't have wings".
That's not how evolution works.
Plus, there's numerous species of pig, that is evolution of the pig.
you missing the point.. evolution states that something over millions of years can become somthing else... (reptiles apparently evolved into some species of birds for example) how can that happen if reptiles cant become birds... (or grow feathers)
How do you know that dinosaurs didn't evolve into birds?
Do you realize that these aren't baseless claims but claims based on research through fossil records?
Evidence! Show me the evidence!
Evolution of the wing
Dinosaur to bird
http://www.dinosaur-world.com/feathered_dinosaurs/wing_evolution.htm
Vibe are you serious? This is the best evidence that evolution can produce? This is a laugh fest! What an absolute joke. -
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »You guys are funny w all the evolution nonsense like, "pigs don't have wings".
That's not how evolution works.
Plus, there's numerous species of pig, that is evolution of the pig.
you missing the point.. evolution states that something over millions of years can become somthing else... (reptiles apparently evolved into some species of birds for example) how can that happen if reptiles cant become birds... (or grow feathers)
How do you know that dinosaurs didn't evolve into birds?
Do you realize that these aren't baseless claims but claims based on research through fossil records?
Evidence! Show me the evidence!
Evolution of the wing
Dinosaur to bird
http://www.dinosaur-world.com/feathered_dinosaurs/wing_evolution.htm
"Wings evolved over many, many millions of years. Scientists have extensively studied the wings of modern-day birds and have identified many important anatomical details. Especially important are those not found on the "arms" of non-birds. Major efforts have gone into finding early occurrences of such details in the fossil record, but unfortunately it is far from complete. Wings generally have thin, hollow bones that do not fossilize well and it appears that few of the animals that had them died in environments suitable for fossilization. The lack of fossils makes it difficult to establish the time that each feature first appeared. The times listed below are documented, but do not reflect an even progression from one step of deveopment to the next."- from the article
The article ethers itself! This is what you believe?
What a crock!
No missing link+
No record of fossiles+
No progression of development=
-
"Unfortunately this book has been used to replace the Gods of Africa. Africa's ? is the image of a white man. The book has laos been used to cast a spell on the African from which he may never recover! The African has a black face but a white ? . Until he recovers he will forever wallow in the quicksands of underdevelopment.
India and China are developing because the majority of Indians worship a ? that looks like an Indian. China is developing because the majority of Chinese worship a ? that has the Chinese look"
? isn't white. Argument is nothing more than mindless banter. Amen. -
He asked for evidence but what's the point when he won't accept it nor would he understand it?
No record in fossils=check
No progression of development= check
No missing link=check
What's there to believe or accept? There is no evidence for evolution. Thanks, but try again. -
DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »DoUwant2go2Heaven? wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »You guys are funny w all the evolution nonsense like, "pigs don't have wings".
That's not how evolution works.
Plus, there's numerous species of pig, that is evolution of the pig.
you missing the point.. evolution states that something over millions of years can become somthing else... (reptiles apparently evolved into some species of birds for example) how can that happen if reptiles cant become birds... (or grow feathers)
How do you know that dinosaurs didn't evolve into birds?
Do you realize that these aren't baseless claims but claims based on research through fossil records?
Evidence! Show me the evidence!
Evolution of the wing
Dinosaur to bird
http://www.dinosaur-world.com/feathered_dinosaurs/wing_evolution.htm
"Wings evolved over many, many millions of years. Scientists have extensively studied the wings of modern-day birds and have identified many important anatomical details. Especially important are those not found on the "arms" of non-birds. Major efforts have gone into finding early occurrences of such details in the fossil record, but unfortunately it is far from complete. Wings generally have thin, hollow bones that do not fossilize well and it appears that few of the animals that had them died in environments suitable for fossilization. The lack of fossils makes it difficult to establish the time that each feature first appeared. The times listed below are documented, but do not reflect an even progression from one step of deveopment to the next."- from the article
The article ethers itself! This is what you believe?
What a crock!
No missing link+
No record of fossiles+
No progression of development=
LOL relax bruh, science is still at work here, but it gives you the general idea if how this did happened.
Science will find more links and the puzzle will continue to come together. -
"Listen--science and technology rules our world and it will continue to do so.Mankind has come so far not because of religion;
Science,free thinkers,and technology has brought us this far.While some black men look for answers in religion, the white man look for solutions in science.
Religion almost always stiffles free thought and innovation.Religion controls and instills fear;religous types have monopolise morality and preach religious hatred Religion want to keep you in the dark,in your cocoon. Science on the other hand liberates the very best of human ingenuity by means of reasoning, experimentation,exploration and adventurism"
No. ? rules the world. Do you know Him?
