In Something That Make Your Soul Burn Slow News: Man Ordered To Pay child Support For Her Baby...
Options
Comments
-
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
-
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
Because the government don't want to pay for that child. -
They say tight jeans lowers sperm count, good, no child support.
-
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?
As wrong as the courts were, this is a damn good point. In life there's often consequences for ignorance.
No logical reason why that divorce shouldn't have been finalized after 16 years. This has to be the result of simpish behavior. Might've even been hitting his wife off and on. ? had a damn target sign on his back far as she, or they, we're concerned. The poor simple simone didn't stand a chance. -
? should've divorced her..waited too long. It's ? up but take that L.
-
Will Munny wrote: »Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?
To be taken to the cleaners -
KingFreeman wrote: »KingFreeman wrote: »Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
That ? ain't her fault. Its the state law. He needs to gun down the legislature.
This ? awful and the other dude grinning hard as ? right now.
Nah ol girl and dude with the slick grin getting clapped.
Right, cuz she could always give him his $$$ back every month. But you know these hoes have no morals and proud of being an adult that gets taken cared of.Will Munny wrote: »Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?
This....
Man made laws made marriage undesirable. -
mryounggun wrote: »The law is the law. There will always be these sorts of one off situations where the law ? someone over.
Outrage should really be aimed at the wife.
The law is blatant ? . Outrage needs to be aimed at the law too. Nobody would have a reason to be mad at the wife if a ? law wasn't in place. -
So in other words from reading this post, don't start a relationship or marry a chick with kids? Gotcha
-
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
If it the same reasoning as here:
If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life. -
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
-
BUT WHY WOULD YOU JUST SEPARATE FROM SOMEBODY FOR 16 YEARS AND NOT GET A DIVORCE?!?!?
-
yea i ain't got much sympathy on this one....should've got that final divorce paperwork and you would t be worrying bout this dumb ?
-
-
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?
This.. How u separated for 16 years without signing divorce papers to make it official?.. That makes no sense..
16 years... -
where the hell the real father at?
-
divorce aint cheap.
but thats just a bull ? law to begin with -
Shuffington wrote: »divorce aint cheap.
but thats just a bull ? law to begin with
But if after 16 years you ain't managed to do it...any consequences fall on you -
KingFreeman wrote: »A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
I think its like Chris Rock said, "Women go to court and say 'your honor, I was accustomed to this', and they get all type of child support. They probably sell the story to the judge that "even though its not his child, when he was with us he helped shoulder the load, I cant do it by myself without some continued financial support from him"...which is BS -
A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
Daaaaamn that's some scary ? , there's so many fine ass baby mamas out there (most women over 26). I'll keep this in mind if I ever shack up with a chick who has a kid, but these policies are going to make a lot of men avoid marriage and serious relationships if these lawmakers and judges keep ? things up. -
Why didn't they get divorced. It's a stupid law, but the situation is his own fault.
-
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is ? up - end... of.... story.
-
BiblicalAtheist wrote: »A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
If it the same reasoning as here:
If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.
Not even worth the risk.
What if he dies or gets locked up?
Guess who's gonna have to pay then? -
BiblicalAtheist wrote: »A few years ago I went back to school. One of my classmates I was cool with, mother was a judge. He told me in some places your Common-Law wife can get child support out of you for a kid thats not even yours....Meaning: If u live with a ? and HER kid long enough, if u decide to leave the relationship, she can turn around and have the court make u pay support for her kid....How is this allowed to happen???
If it the same reasoning as here:
If you stay with the mother and child long enough to be classified as 'common-law' you have assumed responsibility of fatherhood over her children(now your 'step children'). However if her ex is paying child support already, you do not have to pay as the natural father is assumed to be an active role, physically or monetarily, in the child's life.
Not even worth the risk.
What if he dies or gets locked up?
Guess who's gonna have to pay then?
So what's the explanation for this fuckery? Does the judicial system feel that woman can't handle their responsibilities as an adult? I don't see any other reason why a child is forced on someone.
-
Yea Yea they could've / should've got divorced. Does that change that it ain't his kid ? Stop being ridiculous. The law is ? up - end... of.... story.
You can't just gloss over being separated for 16 years and not getting divorced. Yes, the the law is ? up but that 16 years is not just some small detail in this
