In Something That Make Your Soul Burn Slow News: Man Ordered To Pay child Support For Her Baby...
Options
1CK1S
Members Posts: 27,471 ✭✭✭✭✭
In Which It Isnt't His!
A man was shocked when he was ordered to pay child support to a his former wife for a child she had with her current boyfriend.
45-year-old Joe Vandusen received a letter from the Iowa Department of Human Services, notifying him that he would have to pay support for the child, although he is not the father.
The Davenport man is protesting the new state law that requires him to financially support the child who is not his.
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
One year ago, his wife gave birth to a baby by another man, but the state is coming after him for child support.
Vandusen contact the Iowa Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) to say that he is not the biological father of his estranged wife’s child and he offered to take a paternity test to prove it.
However, he was told that it does not matter whether he is the father or not.
“They said that since I am still legally married, I will be responsible for child support,” Vandusen said.
A spokesperson for Human Services said that in a case like this, the husband is considered the legal father of his wife’s child.
Other states have similar laws, which are intended to ensure that all children receive adequate financial support.
Vandusen said that he recently lost his job and does not have the money to pay child support or for an attorney to file for divorce.
A man was shocked when he was ordered to pay child support to a his former wife for a child she had with her current boyfriend.
45-year-old Joe Vandusen received a letter from the Iowa Department of Human Services, notifying him that he would have to pay support for the child, although he is not the father.
The Davenport man is protesting the new state law that requires him to financially support the child who is not his.
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
One year ago, his wife gave birth to a baby by another man, but the state is coming after him for child support.
Vandusen contact the Iowa Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) to say that he is not the biological father of his estranged wife’s child and he offered to take a paternity test to prove it.
However, he was told that it does not matter whether he is the father or not.
“They said that since I am still legally married, I will be responsible for child support,” Vandusen said.
A spokesperson for Human Services said that in a case like this, the husband is considered the legal father of his wife’s child.
Other states have similar laws, which are intended to ensure that all children receive adequate financial support.
Vandusen said that he recently lost his job and does not have the money to pay child support or for an attorney to file for divorce.
Comments
-
Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
-
KingFreeman wrote: »Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
That ? ain't her fault. Its the state law. He needs to gun down the legislature.
This ? awful and the other dude grinning hard as ? right now. -
if they are still legally married, who petitioned for support, the wife ?In Which It Isnt't His!
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
-
She committed adultery... thats grounds for divorce.. so if she has kids outside of that technically shouldnt she be paying him?
-
KingFreeman wrote: »Couldn't be me. No news report. Just 2 bodies and an orphan.
That ? ain't her fault. Its the state law. He needs to gun down the legislature.
This ? awful and the other dude grinning hard as ? right now.
Nah ol girl and dude with the slick grin getting clapped.
-
bununs alias wrote: »
The wife probably receives some type of welfare. The state just want their money so they go after the husband. ? better learn how to do divorces on their own cuz separation aint enough -
Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?
-
In Which It Isnt't His!
A man was shocked when he was ordered to pay child support to a his former wife for a child she had with her current boyfriend.
45-year-old Joe Vandusen received a letter from the Iowa Department of Human Services, notifying him that he would have to pay support for the child, although he is not the father.
The Davenport man is protesting the new state law that requires him to financially support the child who is not his.
Vandusen said that he and his wife separated 16 years ago, but never officially got divorced. They both moved on to new relationships.
One year ago, his wife gave birth to a baby by another man, but the state is coming after him for child support.
Vandusen contact the Iowa Child Support Recovery Unit (CSRU) to say that he is not the biological father of his estranged wife’s child and he offered to take a paternity test to prove it.
However, he was told that it does not matter whether he is the father or not.
“They said that since I am still legally married, I will be responsible for child support,” Vandusen said.
A spokesperson for Human Services said that in a case like this, the husband is considered the legal father of his wife’s child.
Other states have similar laws, which are intended to ensure that all children receive adequate financial support.
Vandusen said that he recently lost his job and does not have the money to pay child support or for an attorney to file for divorce.
Got banged by the bastard law myself. It is what it is tho. -
Sheesh
-
The law is the law. There will always be these sorts of one off situations where the law ? someone over.
Outrage should really be aimed at the wife. -
mryounggun wrote: »The law is the law. There will always be these sorts of one off situations where the law ? someone over.
Outrage should really be aimed at the wife.
And the father of the kid. He knows that's his kid so he should take responsibility by reimbursing the husband back. -
I hope that the wife is on some sort of government assistance and the state went after him, cause if his wife filed for child support on her own she ain't ? ....
-
In my situation, the dude that she was with afterward adopted the child. I signed the papers saying I was the father when she was born. I was young, 19. Paid for 3 yrs. Haven't spoken to her since.
-
So why not go after the biological father?
-
? marriage post
-
Take me to jail
-
Happy father's day?
-
If i was dude i would call the local news and keep calling for them to help out. Sometimes that ? helps when local coverage gets on that ass
-
BiblicalAtheist wrote: »Happy father's day?
Lol dead -
Double ether.BiblicalAtheist wrote: »Happy father's day?
Because they love each other! ? that, give me a chick that's cool with going together forever lol.Will Munny wrote: »Why on earth would any male want to get married in this country?
-
Delegalize marriage
-
Marriage it self is not the issue in this case. They should have gotten a divorce a long time ago. Why let it go to the way side for 16 years?
-
The woman is ? man takin' that money. The other guy has no pride but ? it, free gwup.
Yeah 100 could not have been me -
It's easy to know this is wrong, when you don't start entertaining all of that convoluted biased logic the law uses.
The law's wrong, and I'm sure she could do something about it so she's probably wrong too. -
Those fools in Iowa allowed that stupid law to pass. Whoever is on the birth certificate should be the one paying for support. If her husband did not agree to adopt the child then this is bogus.
