The 2016 NBA Offseason Thread
Options
Comments
-
Alpha_Ambition wrote: »
CHEAP SEATS USED TO BE SOMETHING -
I knew they were gonna show shaq when kobe was talkin lmao -
This is true but Dwight and Kobe have different kinds of ? to them even though they are both ? .
You right though -
Low risk high reward. I actually like this. -
Low risk high reward. I actually like this.
he had a bad year last year but i think hes better than that. wanted the nets to give him a shot -
This team is definitely going to be better sooner than later. Not a contender at all. Tyreke seems to not want to come off the bench but he is a perfect candidate. He can play the wing or PG. I can see him out there with Asik/Jones/Hill/T. Evans/E. Moore. Run the same Iso plays that Crawford/Iso-Joe does. Have Hill and Moore for the kickout. Asik/ Jones for the rebound-putback. Asik and maybe E. Moore will be starters in the beginning of the year.
-
Low risk high reward. I actually like this.
Nice move really nice move.
Just another reason Ernie Grunfeld ain't worth ? ! -
This team is definitely going to be better sooner than later. Not a contender at all. Tyreke seems to not want to come off the bench but he is a perfect candidate. He can play the wing or PG. I can see him out there with Asik/Jones/Hill/T. Evans/E. Moore. Run the same Iso plays that Crawford/Iso-Joe does. Have Hill and Moore for the kickout. Asik/ Jones for the rebound-putback. Asik and maybe E. Moore will be starters in the beginning of the year.
tyreke is the worst kinda player in the sense that he still think his value is what it was at his height when he probably is better coming off the bench at this stage in his career
Crawford has made a living coming off the bench for the clips, and he still gets busy and is way older than Tyreke. Tyreke that type of teammate that be wanting to throw the ball at the rim to pad his rebound stats.
really had high hopes for dude when they signed him -
This team is definitely going to be better sooner than later. Not a contender at all. Tyreke seems to not want to come off the bench but he is a perfect candidate. He can play the wing or PG. I can see him out there with Asik/Jones/Hill/T. Evans/E. Moore. Run the same Iso plays that Crawford/Iso-Joe does. Have Hill and Moore for the kickout. Asik/ Jones for the rebound-putback. Asik and maybe E. Moore will be starters in the beginning of the year.
tyreke is the worst kinda player in the sense that he still think his value is what it was at his height when he probably is better coming off the bench at this stage in his career
Crawford has made a living coming off the bench for the clips, and he still gets busy and is way older than Tyreke. Tyreke that type of teammate that be wanting to throw the ball at the rim to pad his rebound stats.
really had high hopes for dude when they signed him
I have a feeling he will get traded or sign somewhere else but they will insist he comes off the bench. Then all that talent will be realized. His skill set is iso-ball; Iso-Joe/Crawford/Tyreke Evans. He may never evolve but it is up to him. -
Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
-
5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example. -
5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke? -
5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system. -
5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
Soloman Hill i guess
-
5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose? -
Rumor about the knicks signing lance idk about that
-
5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose?
He tried to win last year and you see how that went -
i dont think Caddo understood the question5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose?
but again, they were decimated with injuries with practically the same squad that made the playoffs the previous year
i mean, i still think, that roster, when healthy was b/t 6th and 8th seed, but still, they regressed something terribly due to injuries
this year, on paper, maybe somewhere b/t 7th and 5th? idk. there was so much roster turn around. Everything would have to happen perfectly for them to go even that high
-
5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose?
Hell he gon lose with Tyreke at the point. When J'rue got off of minute restrictions, he was doing his thing but by that time injuries had damn near everyone out hurt.
His post-All Star Break averages of 21.2 points, 3.3 rebounds, 7.3 assists, 1.7 steals, and 1.7 three-pointers per game -
Magicjohnson wrote: »af.r.i.c.a. wrote: »Sources telling me most GMs expect Westbrook to be moved before the start of the regular season. Celtics Heat and Lakers in the mix
You mean beck of bleacher report said that hours ago
Dawg chris broussard n you got the same sources
-
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Rumor about the knicks signing lance idk about that
Lance who? -
KingHustle wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Rumor about the knicks signing lance idk about that
Lance who?
The one and only
The 8th grader
Lance a make em dance
BK's Finest
The Licncoln prodigy -
i dont think Caddo understood the question5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose?
but again, they were decimated with injuries with practically the same squad that made the playoffs the previous year
i mean, i still think, that roster, when healthy was b/t 6th and 8th seed, but still, they regressed something terribly due to injuries
this year, on paper, maybe somewhere b/t 7th and 5th? idk. there was so much roster turn around. Everything would have to happen perfectly for them to go even that high5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Who y'all got that is better suited to start over Tyreke?
depends on what you are expecting tbh
i mean, Reke is a defensive liability. I aint gon get all technical and post +/- stats but just using the eyeball test, he could give two ? about playing defense so, its plausible to believe that any offensive contributions he might make are negated b/c of his lack of defense
if hill is legit and gets comfortable in the offense, i think whatever production he provides offensively is a bonus, but it doesnt help to score 12 if you giving up 18 on the other end. Just using an example.
Lol so who is better suited to start over Tyreke?
J'rue Holiday- He fits what Gentry is trying to do. He doesnt have Tyreke's versatility but he fits the system.
What is Gentry trying to do? Lose?
Hell he gon lose with Tyreke at the point. When J'rue got off of minute restrictions, he was doing his thing but by that time injuries had damn near everyone out hurt.
His post-All Star Break averages of 21.2 points, 3.3 rebounds, 7.3 assists, 1.7 steals, and 1.7 three-pointers per game
I'm not saying Jrue sucks I just think Tyreke is y'all 2nd best player and I don't see anybody on y'all team that's a clear upgrade over him at this time. -
KingHustle wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Rumor about the knicks signing lance idk about that
Lance who?
-
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/17062314/jermaine-edmondson-transfer-michigan-state-spartans-was-alleged-incident-draymond-green
Wow.. Welvmond hit that ? so hard it forced him to want to transfer.. Gawd Damn...
