LMS Debate: solemnsauce vs Kai. Should a world court be formed...
Options
Comments
-
@Sion over there cheatin and ? !! Kai loses a post right!!?
-
im sporty so my advice is dont fall for the jab -
Team America loss
-
What I said isn't anything different than what I may have posted in other debates tho. I'm just excited and honestly can't wait until my own debate. I deleted my post anyways tho cuz I know Team America gonna ? and moan. It doesn't make any difference at this point.
i respect u for preemptively holding da L -
What the count at right now? USA - 2, WORLD - 3?
-
Told yall...
-
See Sion, the problem is..it aint what you know, its what you can prove. She cant prove any of her points because evidence elsewhere proves them to be false. So i based my attack on the fact that..aight prove it. But she was focused on showing what she knows. Displaying her intelligence with the use of big words, that most ? in awe of off the strength. Take away the complex way in the way she structures it..its really just a bunch of..it would be good because good people would hold bad people accountable. Evidence proves theres alot more bad people in the court systems than good.
and thats my final post 2 steps -
is the fix in?
-
-
SolemnSauce wrote: »See Sion, the problem is..it aint what you know, its what you can prove. She cant prove any of her points because evidence elsewhere proves them to be false. So i based my attack on the fact that..aight prove it. But she was focused on showing what she knows. Displaying her intelligence with the use of big words, that most ? in awe of off the strength. Take away the complex way in the way she structures it..its really just a bunch of..it would be good because good people would hold bad people accountable. Evidence proves theres alot more bad people in the court systems than good.
and thats my final post 2 steps
Pffff this is how you end it?!
-
not sure what happened here.....
are yall talking about what @sion said about jobs....
he didnt exactly talk about the topic.
from what goldie quoted its not related to the topic but more of distant cousin of the topic...since it was used to prove a point for the topic.
it was an indirect violation.....
cant be throwing chairs in the ring homie
with that being said....kai has only 1 more post then we go to the judges -
winners in bold
@yellowtapesport vs @SimptimusLEMZUS
@atribecalledgabi vs @CeLLaR-DooR
@mryounggun vs @Preach2Teach
@BOSSExcellence vs @Young_Chitlin
@Lou_Cypher vs @zzombie
@Stiff vs @Figo
@SolemnSauce vs @Kai
@obnoxiouslyfresh vs @Sion
@b'mer vs @MistyKnight
@SuperSoaker vs @Paprika
@NeighborhoodNomad. vs @AggyAF
score is us-3 the world-3 -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »winners in bold
@yellowtapesport vs @SimptimusLEMZUS
@atribecalledgabi vs @CeLLaR-DooR
@mryounggun vs @Preach2Teach
@BOSSExcellence vs @Young_Chitlin
@Lou_Cypher vs @zzombie
@Stiff vs @Figo
@SolemnSauce vs @Kai
@obnoxiouslyfresh vs @Sion
@b'mer vs @MistyKnight
@SuperSoaker vs @Paprika
@NeighborhoodNomad. vs @AggyAF
score is us-3 the world-3
It's over. I didnt even get a turn -
obnoxiouslyfresh wrote: »2stepz_ahead wrote: »winners in bold
@yellowtapesport vs @SimptimusLEMZUS
@atribecalledgabi vs @CeLLaR-DooR
@mryounggun vs @Preach2Teach
@BOSSExcellence vs @Young_Chitlin
@Lou_Cypher vs @zzombie
@Stiff vs @Figo
@SolemnSauce vs @Kai
@obnoxiouslyfresh vs @Sion
@b'mer vs @MistyKnight
@SuperSoaker vs @Paprika
@NeighborhoodNomad. vs @AggyAF
score is us-3 the world-3
It's over. I didnt even get a turn
you are up next -
obnoxiouslyfresh wrote: »2stepz_ahead wrote: »winners in bold
@yellowtapesport vs @SimptimusLEMZUS
@atribecalledgabi vs @CeLLaR-DooR
@mryounggun vs @Preach2Teach
@BOSSExcellence vs @Young_Chitlin
@Lou_Cypher vs @zzombie
@Stiff vs @Figo
@SolemnSauce vs @Kai
@obnoxiouslyfresh vs @Sion
@b'mer vs @MistyKnight
@SuperSoaker vs @Paprika
@NeighborhoodNomad. vs @AggyAF
score is us-3 the world-3
It's over. I didnt even get a turn
u up next..@obnoxiouslyfresh
WHOOP HIS EMOTIONAL ASS!!!! -
What is my topic?
-
Hahaha @Sion put his foot in his mouth. It is in part, laws and the lack of laws that makes corporations move overseas. To say they dont play some role in moving a company is asinine.
Child labor laws for one. -
I thought everyone knew they produced everything in China cuz they pay like $.50/hr.
-
Team World CARAJO
-
not_osirus_jenkins wrote: »Hahaha @Sion put his foot in his mouth. It is in part, laws and the lack of laws that makes corporations move overseas. To say they dont play some role in moving a company is asinine.
Child labor laws for one.
can we chill on the topic until kai last post -
SolemnSauce wrote: »See Sion, the problem is..it aint what you know, its what you can prove. She cant prove any of her points because evidence elsewhere proves them to be false. So i based my attack on the fact that..aight prove it. But she was focused on showing what she knows. Displaying her intelligence with the use of big words, that most ? in awe of off the strength. Take away the complex way in the way she structures it..its really just a bunch of..it would be good because good people would hold bad people accountable. Evidence proves theres alot more bad people in the court systems than good.
and thats my final post 2 steps
I think the saying is "you can't fool all of the people all of the time but if you fool the right ones the rest will fall behind". Frankly I don't think the judges are stupid at all especially Pico. Purr told me once Pico took an advanced high level calculus class for ? and giggles and aced it.
I could easily go through your post and show the judges every fallacy, inconsistency and contradiction in your post but I'm going to refrain cuz that's not me. The last paragraph is laughable, generalisations all over that have nothing to do with anything no diss.
lol...talk is cheap b, did drake get pied on..is meek really on his girls tour. ion know but back to back was nominated for a grammy fam.
and not for nothin, the descrepency that u pointed out u had, was false and pointed out by a ? that dont even like me..so, you tell me..you tell meeeee..psst.. aight..go slept on that -
This next debate may low-key end up being the best one. Sion can't stop ? inserting himself in other people's debates and now he finally gets his chance to prove himself (don't choke, ? !) and OB is low-key on the verge of a nervous breakdown and needs a whipping boy to take her deep-seated frustration and resentment out on.
Where's my popcorn? -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »not_osirus_jenkins wrote: »Hahaha @Sion put his foot in his mouth. It is in part, laws and the lack of laws that makes corporations move overseas. To say they dont play some role in moving a company is asinine.
Child labor laws for one.
can we chill on the topic until kai last post
Topic was should should a world court be formed...
My post mentions nothing of world courts sir -
SolemnSauce wrote: »A world court is not other countries in the sense that it is an impartial system of appointed officials capable their apt fields. This could include human rights attorneys, judges learned in cases of relevance.
You're arguments are nonsensical and all over the place. You seem to be saying that since there is corruption in government that higher levels have higher amounts and that all other countries are more corrupt than the US. None of these claims have you or can you prove.
A world court could have no standing in matters that lie within the jurisdiction of a state or country. The purpose a world court is not to override the laws of a given state or country, but to provide a legal framework in places where jurisdiction is up for contention. For example, an Australian man who committed sex crimes in the Philippines let's say, could not be tried in Australia for those crimes but could in the Philippines where he is much more likely to bribe his way out of it. Criminals like him could be tried in a world court for violating the human rights of the children he assaulted.
That already happens Kai, extradition happens on a federal level when its requested by the country that that person return to their home country to face persecution for crimes commited in that country. Say they commited crimes in Australia and fled to the Phillipines. And thats a whole nother subject.
I dont think you understand the concept of what a world court would be. It would be a centralized location of judges in an appointed legal system based on global law. Like the star fleet in star trek, you are arguing for a system that is already in place.
If it already exists how can you argue that it shouldn't, your argument is already defeat if you are admitting that it exists. What I'm arguing for us an expansion on the precedent set by things like the international crime court.And as far as the US not being the most corrupt. Why do you think jobs are shipped over seas, cause the CEO's like to vactation? Its because corrupt goverments have corrupt laws that we dont have and wont fly in the US. Like basic child labor laws.
Jobs are shipped oversees not because of corruption but because of greed and the fact that big corporations want to outsource the jobs to countries where workers make slave wages
A world court could actually work to put an end to things like sweat shops and child labor which could benefit people two fold. Corporations would be forced to pay people a living wage and keep jobs in America since the incentive outsource had been eliminated, and the poorest of the poor get raised or of poverty
Unless you just don't want international crimes prosecuted there is no reason to be against a world court system, especially since you've already admitted we have something similar in place already
-
? the free world
