LMS Debate: solemnsauce vs Kai. Should a world court be formed...
Options
Comments
-
I'll try to have my vote in by tonight
-
Bussy_Getta wrote: »NeighborhoodNomad. wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »Bussy_Getta wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »okay..
what about ur birthday!? hahaha
when is that?? lol
In June don't play me!!
hahaha im jus sayin.. Christmas around the corner u cant be springin that kinda ? on a ? ..
June is feasible..
a ? can save..
and hopefully by then ull forget this cinversation ever happened. :joy: :joy:
Haha! Yeah cuz you know how women forget ? ...
Aye Pico, Why don't you put together an exercise routine for yourself until June, and if you don't "need" lipo by then everybody wins, especially you.
I don't want to lose my ass!!!
You won't lose anything you really want or need. And a routine full body workout will have that ass sitting right tho (along with everything else). -
-
Team USA take the W yet or we still pretending like team world has a chance to keep them ? from whining?
-
Hhmmm if it's possible, I feel we should add some more judges to the panel. Given the size of teams and the topics.
Some impartial and open-minded judges would be ideal -
Young_Chitlin wrote: »
Knowing your topic is important but the winner will always be that person who can convince me that their view on the matter is superior. You can be an expert but if you're a ? debater and do not know how to effectively get your views across, you will lose. You must understand the basic components of logic, psychology, and effective communication to reign supreme imo.
I'm as neutral as they come. -
-
2stepz_ahead wrote: »
Yeah. Yall got it. I'll just observe. -
Hhmmm if it's possible, I feel we should add some more judges to the panel. Given the size of teams and the topics.
We got 5 judges. Realistically it already takes them 3+ days to all get in here and vote. And you wanna add MORE? Each debate is about to be a week-long saga. -
a Targaryen on the judging panel!!?
im wit that! :joy: -
so did we win yet!!?
-
2-0 ? ..
and let yall tell it he wasnt suppose to get 1vote..
-
-
-
-
-
i would like this round to be over before the Christmas break..
-
Gimme a minute to review ...I read through but I want to review again
-
Gimme a minute to review ...I read through but I want to review again
she lost b....yall stop stalling and acknowledge da gawd -
This is easily the closest debate we've had thus far. I had to review it a few times. Both made arguments that the other never really countered.
One of, if not the best point Kai made was:
"A world court system would remove this bias because the prosecutors would not be the good friend of the police officer that had worked with her or she on a multitude of cases. It would be an impartial third party. A world court would also eliminate the technicalities police get off on such as fear for ones own life "forcing" the officer to react in a deadly manner if such matters were prosecuted as violations of human rights"
But the more I thought about, the more the point became trivial. Cases like (freddie gray, trayvon,etc) that wouldn't make it to the world court because it's not a world court issue, it would remain in our court system.
Another great argument Kai made with the "Australian/ Philippines" example, Allergens made the rebuttal stating that extradition already exists, so we wouldn't need a world court to implement that, so that pretty much killed her argument.
Allergens surprised df outta me, cuz Kai is arguably the best debater on the IC, but overall I gotta give the W to Allergens.
-
SolemnSauce wrote: »
I missed parts on the secondpage...calm your fat ass down...I'm being impartial -
This is easily the closest debate we've had thus far. I had to review it a few times. Both made arguments that the other never really countered.
One of, if not the best point Kai made was:
"A world court system would remove this bias because the prosecutors would not be the good friend of the police officer that had worked with her or she on a multitude of cases. It would be an impartial third party. A world court would also eliminate the technicalities police get off on such as fear for ones own life "forcing" the officer to react in a deadly manner if such matters were prosecuted as violations of human rights"
But the more I thought about, the more the point became trivial. Cases like (freddie gray, trayvon,etc) that wouldn't make it to the world court because it's not a world court issue, it would remain in our court system.
Another great argument Kai made with the "Australian/ Philippines" example, Allergens made the rebuttal stating that extradition already exists, so we wouldn't need a world court to implement that, so that pretty much killed her argument.
Allergens surprised df outta me, cuz Kai is arguably the best debater on the IC, but overall I gotta give the W to Allergens.
-
So @Sion trying not to count my vote because I dropped out for future debates AFTER I already voted for Germs?
Lol...
-
Arya Tsaddiq wrote: »So @Sion trying not to count my vote because I dropped out for future debates AFTER I already voted for Germs?
Lol...
? is IC's Tanya Harding...ANYTHING for a team world victory. -
the upset of the century
