Tariq Nasheed Is On Fox News Again 12/20/16
Options
Comments
-
-
He actually destroyed Tucker in this one...
as much as one can when being constantly interrupted and talked over racist ass Faux news.
He was winning until he called his book satire and tongue in cheek... like wtf?
Tariq destroyed himself. -
Malcolm Xtra wrote: »He lost when he decided to even appear on the show....
Like why do blacks with opposing views even appear on this network?
I don't get it.
The challenge. ? probably wanna go on thinking they can be THAT black person to... well... out fox them. Which they probably could, but they're the only ones concerned about that. Fox, its racist and racist viewers, don't care about that ? . -
? tucker and ? fox news. tariq got cacs and ? in their feelings and thats a win in my book.
-
Malcolm Xtra wrote: »He lost when he decided to even appear on the show....
Like why do blacks with opposing views even appear on this network?
I don't get it.
The challenge. ? probably wanna go on thinking they can be THAT black person to... well... out fox them. Which they probably could, but they're the only ones concerned about that. Fox, its racist and racist viewers, don't care about that ? .
Ive seen Marc Lamont Hill hold his own he use to be on Fox for a minute being one of the chief "rebutters" ive watched Fox long enough to know how they play.. they cut you off when you are making a point, Orielly makes soft agreements to make a larger point of contention.. they talk over you.. and use certain types of ? .. who are apt to make themselves look dumb ... ala cam and that one black panther cat that use to be up on there. -
I guess Tariq is working on becoming the go to guy when it's time to talk about race. What's the point in going on that station?
-
Malcolm Xtra wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....
It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...
? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.
Where exactly did you find the misinformation and what is the correct information regarding that error?
https://youtu.be/SsavmtsD6Oc
I'm gonna watch this, but this post doesn't answer my question at all
What specifically in HC is incorrect? The vid you posted doesn't seem to be a refutation of HC
https://youtu.be/e5R6PzZ5lSw
For. This ? talking bout Darwinism the majority of the time. And he sound like a low key Christian who was offended by HC. There definitely may be a few unproven and purposely omitted info in HC. But to say it's all trash is BS. It should just be a entertaining introduction to inspire people to do their own research on their own history and stop letting these white folks miseducate you and your children. -
? is Rollo Goodlove without the Jheri curlplaymaker88 wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »He just dont know when to quit.
? were replaced as the target of the subject of the mack.. but he loooooooooooves me
and ? talk that ? about jesse and al sharpton.. let em have it though..
-
semi-auto-mato wrote: »Ok I'm going to assume there is gonna be a Rd 3. Rd 1 was debatable. It was a long thread and ? was riding for tariq. The race casino line was good. So I'm in a generous mood tonight so I will give Rd 1 to tariq by the smallest of margins.
Rd 2 is Tucker. No debate! That ? got ugly when he started reading ? from Tariq's book. Now I know some of y'all ride for Tariq but nope not this time. Rd 2 is not debatable.
In Rd 3 Tariq is gonna have to do some subtitles, translations, and do which room I'm in. We shall see.
This is kinda the way I seen it too.
The first time I gave props to Tariq for making Tucker stumble after he didn't fall for the slavery bait and hit him wit the race casino ether. I don't know what these ? was on when they said he lost the first time because he didn't lose. He started off slow and then started hitting Tucker wit one or two haymakers and 12 min segment turn to 6 and a quarter before it look like Tucker had to retreat.
This one right here tho it felt like Tariq was way more on the defensive and Tucker made the ? discredit his own books. Tuck actually got him this time to me. -
JDSTAYWITIT wrote: »If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.
Let's examine the quote.
Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.
That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.
Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.
These people want to feel some type of way, they don't care about that.
Gotta agree with that statement ... and I'm not even a Tareeq fan. I might be giving people to much credit to expect them to have understood that it was a misquote and that the book wasn't relevant to the statement, let alone a satirical book.
Stop riding your saviors ? ..... we simply AGREE with tucker carlson ....its not that hard to understand ... he showed you how to dismantle this race baiting "mack" with ease using true FACTS .... this is why all of these afrocentric clowns are afraid to show their faces on a legit news organization like fox news
Legit news station?
Only a racist would think Fox was legit. -
JDSTAYWITIT wrote: »If we're being straight up and judging this as a debate then you're borderline ? if you think Tucker won that.
Let's examine the quote.
Trump has appointed people to his cabinet from the alt-right--**COMMA: what is the alt-right?**--a white supremacists sect that literally throws up ? salutes.
That there is a factual statement. With a basic understanding of punctuation and sentence structure you can establish that no where in the tweet does he even begin to insinuate that Bannon himself was throwing up ? salutes.
Then to deflect w/ the macking stuff is basically throwing in a white towel on the topic at hand in an effort to save face.
These people want to feel some type of way, they don't care about that.
Gotta agree with that statement ... and I'm not even a Tareeq fan. I might be giving people to much credit to expect them to have understood that it was a misquote and that the book wasn't relevant to the statement, let alone a satirical book.
Stop riding your saviors ? ..... we simply AGREE with tucker carlson ....its not that hard to understand ... he showed you how to dismantle this race baiting "mack" with ease using true FACTS .... this is why all of these afrocentric clowns are afraid to show their faces on a legit news organization like fox news
Legit news station?
Only a racist would think Fox was legit.
but we are all complicit in the racism.
because we watch their movies , sports games and tv shows. -
He breaks down his latest appearance on Tucker Carlson's show. Starts at the 14:30 mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x69AnoJuuM&t=0s
-
I don't consider this as a "Debate", I look at it as entertainment more. What Tariq said was true about Trump's cabinet and how they're sect of White Nationalism, there's no dispute to most.
Tucker brought up his book, which is totally irrelevant to what they were talking about because Tucker didn't invite Tariq on to talk about his dating books, it was a cheap shot. But let some of you IC dudes tell it. -
Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....
It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...
? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.
Where exactly did you find the misinformation and what is the correct information regarding that error?https://youtu.be/SsavmtsD6Oc
Good information especially about mustafa hefney....there has to be many more people like him, but haven't spoken up because they weren't African in mind and heart and benefit from being labeled as white...but still didn't see any misinformation from hidden colors
If there is misinformation throughout it, you should be able to give me an example without a 3 hour video...
Bro Hidden colors discusses the Moors...this video here breaks down some of the fallacies that are in Hidden colors...for example in Hidden colors it's discussed that the fall of the Moorish empire was because of Mansa Musa making hajj and displaying so much wealth or some ? like that (couldn't get past the 2nd Hidden colors) which is not true.
Check this video out...https://youtu.be/e5R6PzZ5lSw
It's other videos on YouTube disscusing this topic.
Dude sounds like a sensitive Christian that got his feelings hurt. The funny things is, you're using the knowledge of a random Youtube subscriber as your reference to debunk Hidden Colors which featured scholars. That's all you got? Lmao -
franknitti wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »Malcolm Xtra wrote: »jetlifebih wrote: »He's a podcast host..not a political scientist......doesn't take away hidden colors and his contributions....
It's misinformation all throughout hidden colors...
? was all about getting negroes to get in they emotions...wether that was to make ? feel good or to make them angry.
Where exactly did you find the misinformation and what is the correct information regarding that error?https://youtu.be/SsavmtsD6Oc
I'm gonna watch this, but this post doesn't answer my question at all
What specifically in HC is incorrect? The vid you posted doesn't seem to be a refutation of HChttps://youtu.be/e5R6PzZ5lSw
For. This ? talking bout Darwinism the majority of the time. And he sound like a low key Christian who was offended by HC. There definitely may be a few unproven and purposely omitted info in HC. But to say it's all trash is BS. It should just be a entertaining introduction to inspire people to do their own research on their own history and stop letting these white folks miseducate you and your children.
I don't think the issue is using HC as a way to research further for yourself. I think to some the issue is taking it all as undisputed fact without researching for yourself and that goes for any source of information -
5th Letter wrote: »He breaks down his latest appearance on Tucker Carlson's show. Starts at the 14:30 mark.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x69AnoJuuM&t=0s
He started choking in this vid too around 15
Lmaooo homie wouldnt last in a face to face debate -
I never seen hidden colors. Or heard of it outside of here. I was brought up learning about history other than whats taught in school and all that. I personally dont need this dude's perspective on it I dont even want someone like this's input. I can do better than this this aint my teacher. He comes across as a clown and bafoon. This is my first time seeing him but i gave him a chance. That was one of the most embarrassing, pitiful,ill equipped, bufoonish performances I have ever seen. Just instincts, and his idiotic destructive black people dont vote in the election "view" alone made me steer clear but seeing him he comes across as a joke and thats what Fox uses him as. He's either in on it or a ? . Smart enough to get that money from the slow though i see that. And exploit just like his network Fox. I dont fck with this dude I just aint somebody you can get over on like that.
You can like Hidden colors if thats your thing and acknowledge the bafoonery elsewhere where it (clearly) exists. Check out history for yourself, look deeper if he was a catalyst for some, good but just common sense and now actually having seen dude present himself, I wouldnt trust his perspective on anything. But you can learn from more credible sources. -
These ? be talking about how marching/protesting and praying is played out but still go on Fox News to yell and ? without getting anything accomplished. I coupldve sworn that people were saying that Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and then needed to step aside and let the young folks take over but these new ? doing the same as the old ? . What does he gain by going on Fox every week arguing with Tucker? How many minds will he change? The ones who are really out here in the streets are dying and ? . I applaud Tariq for some of the stuff he's doing but man he need to stop going on Fox.
-
NoCompetition wrote: »I never seen hidden colors. Or heard of it outside of here. I was brought up learning about history other than whats taught in school and all that. I personally dont need this dude's perspective on it I dont even want someone like this's input. I can do better than this this aint my teacher. He comes across as a clown and bafoon. This is my first time seeing him but i gave him a chance. That was one of the most embarrassing, pitiful,ill equipped, bufoonish performances I have ever seen. Just instincts, and his idiotic destructive black people dont vote in the election "view" alone made me steer clear but seeing him he comes across as a joke and thats what Fox uses him as. He's either in on it or a ? . Smart enough to get that money from the slow though i see that. And exploit just like his network Fox. I dont fck with this dude I just aint somebody you can get over on like that.
You can like Hidden colors if thats your thing and acknowledge the bafoonery elsewhere where it (clearly) exists. Check out history for yourself, look deeper if he was a catalyst for some, good but just common sense and now actually having seen dude present himself, I wouldnt trust his perspective on anything. But you can learn from more credible sources.
So you don't know anything about the man or his work, you admit this, yet you still think your opinion was necessary? -
These ? be talking about how marching/protesting and praying is played out but still go on Fox News to yell and ? without getting anything accomplished. I coupldve sworn that people were saying that Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and then needed to step aside and let the young folks take over but these new ? doing the same as the old ? . What does he gain by going on Fox every week arguing with Tucker? How many minds will he change? The ones who are really out here in the streets are dying and ? . I applaud Tariq for some of the stuff he's doing but man he need to stop going on Fox.
I agree that him continually going on fox isn't smart at all
It seems like he may be out to prove something to himself and that may be why he keeps going -
-
taqueef says "literally" in everything
-
NoCompetition wrote: »I never seen hidden colors. Or heard of it outside of here. I was brought up learning about history other than whats taught in school and all that. I personally dont need this dude's perspective on it I dont even want someone like this's input. I can do better than this this aint my teacher. He comes across as a clown and bafoon. This is my first time seeing him but i gave him a chance. That was one of the most embarrassing, pitiful,ill equipped, bufoonish performances I have ever seen. Just instincts, and his idiotic destructive black people dont vote in the election "view" alone made me steer clear but seeing him he comes across as a joke and thats what Fox uses him as. He's either in on it or a ? . Smart enough to get that money from the slow though i see that. And exploit just like his network Fox. I dont fck with this dude I just aint somebody you can get over on like that.
You can like Hidden colors if thats your thing and acknowledge the bafoonery elsewhere where it (clearly) exists. Check out history for yourself, look deeper if he was a catalyst for some, good but just common sense and now actually having seen dude present himself, I wouldnt trust his perspective on anything. But you can learn from more credible sources.
So you don't know anything about the man or his work, you admit this, yet you still think your opinion was necessary?
You missed the part where i said I actually watched this video to give him a chance? or the part where I heard of some of his foolery and "positions" beforehand but was not impressed? But you seem to actually take him seriously and follow him and have a high opinion. Have at it. haha. Im laughing and probably he is too...and Fox we're all laughing at you "useful idiots"...just my motives differ from Fox and apparently this guy too but it is funny how easy yall clowns are though Im sure they think. ButIm not interested in leading fools down flawed paths for a buck and taking advantage of them. But unlike you, I recognize the game.
That said because im a logical "all sides"type I agree with learning from more credible sources. As I said. See with me its not just all emotion and one side many of yall seem to have a blind spot and he even basically said he lacks credibility himself in that video. I dont know what to tell yall yall too slow and here to be taken advantage of if youstill cant see. Im not that type of person. This clown is light work...even that is giving him probably undue credit. -
Some of yall are so slow and behind and cant catch the obvious thats why people like this and his ilk take advantage of you. Yall are made for each other.
-
NoCompetition wrote: »Some of yall are so slow and behind and cant catch the obvious thats why people like this and his ilk take advantage of you. Yall are made for each other.
Nah I caught the part where you said you've never seen Hidden Colors, but you base your opinion not on his works, but on a fox news clip
So to reiterate, you don't know what you're talking about at all and you admit this
Why do you think your opinion is necessary or relevant?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juimJgJbu2Y
