Active shooter at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas
Options
Comments
-
When he sees the Orlando shooter in the after life he's gunna be like
Thank ? America goes through this so the UK don't have too. -
-
Did trump call him a terrorist or nah?
-
This make Virginia tech look like Valentine's Day
-
I take it trump didn't say domestic terrorist or Christian terrorist.
-
-
Typical America
-
The Onion reposts this every time there's a mass shooting, they just edit the city each time.
but this can be stopped.
registering your guns every year and having a mental eval ever year.
and profiling white people know for having multiple guns. -
-
3 ppl i think -
-
They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance -
Well done Trump on not calling it an act of terrorism, you absolute ? .
-
-
They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play. -
They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play.
But that's giving them an out. When non whites do similar acts the media will label it regardless of whatever motives were involved. -
A "mass shooting" four or more people being shot at the same time or location -
5th Letter wrote: »They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play.
But that's giving them an out. When non whites do similar acts the media will label it regardless of whatever motives were involved.
That just means they use the term wrong in reference to crimes nonwhites commit moreso than the the term is valid this time around.
@AZTG is right. There is a pretty specific definition for terrorism. That's why you don't hear the Secretary of Homeland Defense declaring every crazy incident as an act of terrorism.
They are always doing funny things with terminology. It's like how some of them will claim that blacks do more mass shootings than whites. The reason they say that is that a mass shooting has a definition of like more than 2 victims or something like that. So when ? in the hood pull drivebys and hit 3 people, that counts as a mass shooting. Technically they are being truthful even though they know damn well they are misleading people who hear that statement. -
CNN has put his picture up
-
LMAO... here on the British media dude is referred to as a 'gunman'
Typical White owned media hypocrisy. If he was coloured or Asian... y'all know how the deflection would go
As for this mass shooting: same ? , different toilet
America deserves what comes to it regarding gun ownership -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play.
But that's giving them an out. When non whites do similar acts the media will label it regardless of whatever motives were involved.
That just means they use the term wrong in reference to crimes nonwhites commit moreso than the the term is valid this time around.
@AZTG is right. There is a pretty specific definition for terrorism. That's why you don't hear the Secretary of Homeland Defense declaring every crazy incident as an act of terrorism.
They are always doing funny things with terminology. It's like how some of them will claim that blacks do more mass shootings than whites. The reason they say that is that a mass shooting has a definition of like more than 2 victims or something like that. So when ? in the hood pull drivebys and hit 3 people, that counts as a mass shooting. Technically they are being truthful even though they know damn well they are misleading people who hear that statement.
We do not and should not give a rats ass how WHITES define or interpret anything in 2017. They aren't right not by a long stretch. What those people experienced was\is fear. They were and many are still terrified. If we accept what and how these forked tongued racists, oppressive liars choose to title people that don't look like them we are complicit. ? them. They are terrorists.. -
5th Letter wrote: »They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play.
But that's giving them an out. When non whites do similar acts the media will label it regardless of whatever motives were involved.
Yea man. I agree. We shouldnt allow mental illness to be an out.
But end of the day, there is a very distinct definition when it comes to what terrorism is. And that requires an ideology.
Its like we beg the media to call white people terrorists and they tease it but dont. -
500 injured
Wtf -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »They said they won't label the guy until they figure out his motive.
Dude shot up American people from a hotel room loaded w 10 assault rifles. That's terrorism.
and damn, this is now another thing others will copy; high vantage point from a distance
Bruh im with you.
But terrorism needs to have an ideology behind it to be terrorism.
If this dude was just crazed angry white man who wanted to ? people and become a news story for a week, it really cant be classified as terrorism.
Not letting white people off the hook, and not saying this should be allowed to explained away by just saying he was mentally ill.
America needs to eventually come to terms with why they are having all these mass shooting and have an honest discussion about it, and white people have to be held at the forefront of it.
But lets not call it terrorism just cause its a white man while yelling out its not terrorism just causw its a colored man on the flip side.
Dont buy into the games they want you to play.
But that's giving them an out. When non whites do similar acts the media will label it regardless of whatever motives were involved.
That just means they use the term wrong in reference to crimes nonwhites commit moreso than the the term is valid this time around.
@AZTG is right. There is a pretty specific definition for terrorism. That's why you don't hear the Secretary of Homeland Defense declaring every crazy incident as an act of terrorism.
They are always doing funny things with terminology. It's like how some of them will claim that blacks do more mass shootings than whites. The reason they say that is that a mass shooting has a definition of like more than 2 victims or something like that. So when ? in the hood pull drivebys and hit 3 people, that counts as a mass shooting. Technically they are being truthful even though they know damn well they are misleading people who hear that statement.
So NOW they want to be specific about the terminology of what terrorism is? But any other time they label it terrorism with no ? given. Are you falling for their deception? -
58 dead 500+ wounded
https://youtu.be/D5G10FqPRIg
