YouTuber continues to date girl with video of train leaks out
Options
Comments
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
? i get more ? as a Lyft driver than you do as a failed Soundcloud rapper. Lame ? capin for ? he'll never ? .
@blackrain
You two ? got the nerve to speculate on somebody sexuality but you been on my ? in three different threads.
? you and your little fun boy stop desperately seeking my attention. ? ass ? . Scust. -
Imma leave this right here lmaoEmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is shameful. Hoe or not, you have a daughter by the woman and the internet is forever. Who's gonna take the high road here? I feel bad for the little girl.
Meanwhile, revenge porn is against the law in California. I hope she ? him up.
That man been through enough.. Her tryna prosecute him for revenge porn would be savage.. Not to mention he cant make no paper while locked up.
I don't feel sorry for that dude. He didn't get a crash course in hoeology ? with Rita Ora? I don't respect nor pity men who continuously overlook the red flags over a piece of hot ass.
You play with fire..
Yet we're supposed to respect and wife hoes or we corny and insecure.
Is it oochie wally or is it one mic -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Outside of their body women aren't that likeable and while you're trying to love them, they don't love you.
Y'all some sucka for love type of ? . -
OnnaThursday wrote: »Lou_Cypher wrote: »Shes hot, hows the video? Cant watch till i get off work sadly.
Yo I started playing this ? in the breakdown lol had to remember where I was
You mean the break room?
T.H.I.W. -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Ok we dont like them as people sooo what they got what we want -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Outside of their body women aren't that likeable and while you're trying to love them, they don't love you.
Y'all some sucka for love type of ? .
HOH need a new spokesman or nah? -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
? i get more ? as a Lyft driver than you do as a failed Soundcloud rapper.Lame ? capin for ? he'll never ? .
@blackrain
You two ? got the nerve to speculate on somebody sexuality but you been on my ? in three different threads.
? you and your little fun boy stop desperately seeking my attention. ? ass ? . Scust.
Sure you do.
Especially with all this game you be kicking in threads like this one. I’m sure the ladies love that ? .
-
371 replies? Da ? ! A new video better had leaked
-
Busta Carmichael wrote: »@blackgod813 whats the lsa link ?
Ill b back with it -
Busta Carmichael wrote: »Imma leave this right here lmaoEmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is shameful. Hoe or not, you have a daughter by the woman and the internet is forever. Who's gonna take the high road here? I feel bad for the little girl.
Meanwhile, revenge porn is against the law in California. I hope she ? him up.
That man been through enough.. Her tryna prosecute him for revenge porn would be savage.. Not to mention he cant make no paper while locked up.
I don't feel sorry for that dude. He didn't get a crash course in hoeology ? with Rita Ora? I don't respect nor pity men who continuously overlook the red flags over a piece of hot ass.
You play with fire..
Yet we're supposed to respect and wife hors or we corny and insecure.
Is it oochie wally or is it one mic
-
Busta Carmichael wrote: »OnnaThursday wrote: »Lou_Cypher wrote: »Shes hot, hows the video? Cant watch till i get off work sadly.
Yo I started playing this ? in the breakdown lol had to remember where I was
You mean the break room?
T.H.I.W.
Android auto correct<<<<<< -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Outside of their body women aren't that likeable and while you're trying to love them, they don't love you.
Y'all some sucka for love type of ? .
Do you like hanging out with men more than you like hanging out with women.
-
this thread is the reason Amber Rose has a ? walk every year.......
-
This ? tryna shoot his shot
-blockt -
konceptjones wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »Imma leave this right here lmaoEmM HoLLa. wrote: »This is shameful. Hoe or not, you have a daughter by the woman and the internet is forever. Who's gonna take the high road here? I feel bad for the little girl.
Meanwhile, revenge porn is against the law in California. I hope she ? him up.
That man been through enough.. Her tryna prosecute him for revenge porn would be savage.. Not to mention he cant make no paper while locked up.
I don't feel sorry for that dude. He didn't get a crash course in hoeology ? with Rita Ora? I don't respect nor pity men who continuously overlook the red flags over a piece of hot ass.
You play with fire..
Yet we're supposed to respect and wife hors or we corny and insecure.
Is it oochie wally or is it one mic
Lmao how? I edited that superquick. -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
No men are not supposed to be ? a whole bunch of women..... it's wrong when we do it but it is much less damaging to ourselves and our families reputation therefore it's more acceptable because a guy ? a lot of girls is not ruining himself because women will still want him.
but any girl that lets you ? her outside of marriage is of lower standings and does not value herself as much as she should. SHE does not understand that ? has value and that it's the responsibility of a women to protect their ? and not let men just use it. MOST MEN don't want to marry ? .
You still risking std's and pregnancy so yeah you're taking just as big of a risk. ? run around trying to ? every ? that walks by then complain that women can't be trusted and about them having kids by multiple ? . ? ain't even holding themselves to the standards they set for others then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you go on rants about what you do and don't want and what is and isn't acceptable
No you are not taking as big of a risk because to begin with women catch std's easier than men do and we cannot be pregnant...... and I CONDEMED men who ? ? ? around. I had a whole argument in the mgtow thread about ? with no sexual constraints and how not having any constraints is a bad thing.
YOU FEMINIST MALEs ARE DEVOID of reading comprehension and proper thinking ability
But you can still be at risk for creating a child
SO WHAT???? if you did not marry the girl you can always deny it and since she runs ? trains it's probably not yours anyway. YOU need to understand that the possibility of a man just denying his offspring is one of the principle reasons why traditionally women were taught to value their Chasity and wait until marriage.
Now we have dna tests but men still deny their kids or if they are forced to pay CS they still don't properly father their sons......... and that is part of the reason why traditionalism is better
its 2017
ppl like sex
we have condoms, free std testing
date, ? , marry who you please...just be safe and honest with ppl
just because a woman has had multiple partners doesn't mean she is going to mess around on you any more then someone with less partners. a woman with less partners may be more inclined to see what the next ? can do. a woman who subscribes to the belief or grows up in a world that believes sexual activity or wanting to pursue sexual pleasure is inherently linked to immorality, character is more inclined to lie to save face or maybe too ashamed to be seen at the clinic
all this really is is just another way to shame and police ppl, particularly women
and yes the double standard exists because it serves that agenda... if women weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality, it would be just as easy for a man to get sex as it would for a woman
-
Don't.@ me ever again doggy.
I've never been subjected to such flagrant ? flirtation and i drive on the north side.
-
Beware it starts there but the way they talk is by talking about five different topics at once ..i wana join by i aint ready just go thru it an read
-
This ? tryna shoot his shot
-blockt
Not at all.
But it’s crazy that instead of just saying “i like hanging out with women more than men” or “i like hanging out with men more than woman”, you imagine and say some ? ? .
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
No men are not supposed to be ? a whole bunch of women..... it's wrong when we do it but it is much less damaging to ourselves and our families reputation therefore it's more acceptable because a guy ? a lot of girls is not ruining himself because women will still want him.
but any girl that lets you ? her outside of marriage is of lower standings and does not value herself as much as she should. SHE does not understand that ? has value and that it's the responsibility of a women to protect their ? and not let men just use it. MOST MEN don't want to marry ? .
You still risking std's and pregnancy so yeah you're taking just as big of a risk. ? run around trying to ? every ? that walks by then complain that women can't be trusted and about them having kids by multiple ? . ? ain't even holding themselves to the standards they set for others then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you go on rants about what you do and don't want and what is and isn't acceptable
No you are not taking as big of a risk because to begin with women catch std's easier than men do and we cannot be pregnant...... and I CONDEMED men who ? ? ? around. I had a whole argument in the mgtow thread about ? with no sexual constraints and how not having any constraints is a bad thing.
YOU FEMINIST MALEs ARE DEVOID of reading comprehension and proper thinking ability
But you can still be at risk for creating a child
SO WHAT???? if you did not marry the girl you can always deny it and since she runs ? trains it's probably not yours anyway. YOU need to understand that the possibility of a man just denying his offspring is one of the principle reasons why traditionally women were taught to value their Chasity and wait until marriage.
Now we have dna tests but men still deny their kids or if they are forced to pay CS they still don't properly father their sons......... and that is part of the reason why traditionalism is better
its 2017
ppl like sex
we have condoms, free std testing
date, ? , marry who you please...just be safe and honest with ppl
just because a woman has had multiple partners doesn't mean she is going to mess around on you any more then someone with less partners. a woman with less partners may be more inclined to see what the next ? can do. a woman who subscribes to the belief or grows up in a world that believes sexual activity or wanting to pursue sexual pleasure is inherently linked to immorality, character is more likely to lie to save face
all this really is is just another way to shame and police ppl, particularly women
and yes the double standard exists because it serves that agenda... if women weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality, it would be just as easy for a man to get sex as it would for a woman
Ain't nobody tryna police what ? do.
But a ? gotta be a gotdamn fool to cuff a ? that put herself out there like a common yamp -
blackgod813 wrote: »LumGotti wrote:All the flexin DDG does I just take it for what it is considering where he is from. He's from Michigan, and grew up like 30 minutes outside of Detroit. If you've never been to Detroit, that's stunt on everybody city. I've seen it with my own 2 eyes. Folks won't go to the dollar store without wearing they "mink" coat and Cartier glasses.
? ass... muhfucka ain't said ? about a colored linen hookup with the Borsalino and Mauri's to match. -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Outside of their body women aren't that likeable and while you're trying to love them, they don't love you.
Y'all some sucka for love type of ? .
LMAO........who hurt you b?
You sound like a ? right now old ? .
Name something that is likeable about a ? you know. -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
No men are not supposed to be ? a whole bunch of women..... it's wrong when we do it but it is much less damaging to ourselves and our families reputation therefore it's more acceptable because a guy ? a lot of girls is not ruining himself because women will still want him.
but any girl that lets you ? her outside of marriage is of lower standings and does not value herself as much as she should. SHE does not understand that ? has value and that it's the responsibility of a women to protect their ? and not let men just use it. MOST MEN don't want to marry ? .
You still risking std's and pregnancy so yeah you're taking just as big of a risk. ? run around trying to ? every ? that walks by then complain that women can't be trusted and about them having kids by multiple ? . ? ain't even holding themselves to the standards they set for others then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you go on rants about what you do and don't want and what is and isn't acceptable
No you are not taking as big of a risk because to begin with women catch std's easier than men do and we cannot be pregnant...... and I CONDEMED men who ? ? ? around. I had a whole argument in the mgtow thread about ? with no sexual constraints and how not having any constraints is a bad thing.
YOU FEMINIST MALEs ARE DEVOID of reading comprehension and proper thinking ability
But you can still be at risk for creating a child
SO WHAT???? if you did not marry the girl you can always deny it and since she runs ? trains it's probably not yours anyway. YOU need to understand that the possibility of a man just denying his offspring is one of the principle reasons why traditionally women were taught to value their Chasity and wait until marriage.
Now we have dna tests but men still deny their kids or if they are forced to pay CS they still don't properly father their sons......... and that is part of the reason why traditionalism is better
its 2017
ppl like sex
we have condoms, free std testing
date, ? , marry who you please...just be safe and honest with ppl
just because a woman has had multiple partners doesn't mean she is going to mess around on you any more then someone with less partners. a woman with less partners may be more inclined to see what the next ? can do. a woman who subscribes to the belief or grows up in a world that believes sexual activity or wanting to pursue sexual pleasure is inherently linked to immorality, character is more likely to lie to save face
all this really is is just another way to shame and police ppl, particularly women
and yes the double standard exists because it serves that agenda... if women weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality, it would be just as easy for a man to get sex as it would for a woman
Ain't nobody tryna police what ? do.
But a ? gotta be a gotdamn fool to cuff a ? that put herself out there like a common yamp
Says the person who refers to women as yamps
If the next man is cool with being with a "yamp" who cares
You see it as risky from a distance, but her man may see someone who has proven to be trustworthy and able to better satisfy his wants and needs -
mryounggun wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »
? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.
So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?
The way a lot of these ? is talking, namely ? like @LordZuko, is that they seemingly don’t like women...like at all.
Dude literally said that women are worse than used cars.
Take a step back and take that in for all it’s worth.
If that’s how you view women, how do you view men, ? ? You sound wild ? . Like wild. Sometimes, you say a smidge of something that makes sense...like it has logic behind it and you ? it up with some other ? that seems emotionally fueled by ? tears. Your consistency is kinda disgusting. We get it, you don’t like women and their antics...
So contrastly, you either like ? or are asexual or something else. Fact is, the term “men going their own way” even by itself...sounds wild ? . What way you going, ? ? Explain.
Matter fact, don’t.
Been saying this for years. It's clear that a lot of ? don't actually love or like women...they just tolerate them.
Outside of their body women aren't that likeable and while you're trying to love them, they don't love you.
Y'all some sucka for love type of ? .
LMAO........who hurt you b?
front of duke's crib like this:
