YouTuber continues to date girl with video of train leaks out

Options
1242527293042

Comments

  • 2stepz_ahead
    2stepz_ahead Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 32,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    only the most trifling ? will try to point out how other do trifling ? .

    that lets me know they not ok with the ? they did.
  • 2stepz_ahead
    2stepz_ahead Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 32,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    an if we speaking about a phase......then when does it stop?

    when she finds a ? to wife her?

  • HafBayked
    HafBayked Members Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017
    Options
    lol nah man hoes are hoes forever and ever and nobodies wife sucked ? at the movies before
  • konceptjones
    konceptjones Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 13,139 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    LPast wrote: »
    LPast wrote: »
    That's all y'all got?

    Wouls you be ok with your wife and the mother of your children posting nudes all day on the internet?

    No. But I'm not him. If he cared about that he wouldn't of wifed her.

    He wifed her because he was infatuated with her, ? 's pretty well documented. Once she was single he took his shot.
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Westie wrote: »
    Its funny how every woman is calling him a simp and a sucka in that other thread, saying she doesn't respect him.

    Yet you got dudes in here throwing on the cape. "Bu..bu..if he's happy and can look past it" this ain't Disney ? . She's more than likely still getting blowed out.

    Who raised u ? ?

    The better question is why is anyone so bothered about a relationship that is consensual, legal, and not affecting you in any way possible.


    It can affect them. The normalization of the expectation that known hoes will still be wifed and paraded about is what's going on here. This is nothing more than Kim K/Paris Hilton at the Youtuber level. ? like this starts big and trickles down from there. Next thing you know some basic broad in a well viewed shaky-cam video on Shesfreaky.com taking 6 ? in the middle of a busy laundromat is gonna believe that ? don't count anymore and strut around here like her ? don't stink, nose in the air 'cause she genuinely believes she's better than a dude with his ? together.

    Christina-Applegate-Eye-Roll-Married-With-Children.gif?fit=500%2C371&ssl=1

    So are you mad at the fact that the hoes are okay with their decisions or that they're hoes? There will always be glorification of hoes it's been happening for a very long time. There will also always be a stigma attached. Misogyny isn't going anywhere. That double standard isn't going anywhere so I don't know what you ? are scared of.

    You don't want a ? , don't find one. You don't like somebody's background Or when you find out their background? Don't ? with them. I don't know why you're mad at strangers for their choices. Worry about your good girls telling you the truth.

    Also dudes that with their ? together? Are you the same type of ? that always talk ? about women and their choices? Choose better. End of story.
  • playmaker88
    playmaker88 Members Posts: 67,905 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    an if we speaking about a phase......then when does it stop?

    when she finds a ? to wife her?

    a phase is just a mere justification.. adolescence is a phase.. that other ? is a choice
  • T. Sanford
    T. Sanford Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 25,291 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017
    Options
    Pretty much everything that I wanted to say has been addressed by some trill ones. I'm just going to drop this here for the ol simp dude in the video that's suffering from lack of a backbone

    https://youtu.be/dkStzbj0GDQ

    No need to save these hoes
  • Westie
    Westie Members Posts: 12,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    The feelings flying around in here...
  • sunlord
    sunlord Members Posts: 515 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    HafBayked wrote: »
    no lies man.....no lies

    I didnt watch either video....and I cant say for sure I'd just automatically keep her given the same situation

    i've just never been appalled by a woman's past or judged them by it


    Well I judge you for not judging them...... judge them it's the right thing to do.
  • atribecalledgabi
    atribecalledgabi Members, Moderators Posts: 14,063 Regulator
    Options
    LPast wrote: »
    What exactly did Kanye risk when wifing Kim K?

    He's expecting the world to ignore the fact that we've all seen her ? naked getting ? by Ray J and that her only real claim to fame is her ass, naked or covered.

    He's expecting that we take her seriously.

    He's believes that their money should force us to view her as a wholesome, upright, woman of morals despite the fact that the broad is STILL dropping naked or nearly naked pics on a regular basis.

    Despite all of that, Kanye still looks like a chump that wifed a porn star and nothing more.

    Fam...he rapped about getting some chick's ? bleach on his clothes after ? her in a bathroom. Is this really the ? you think cares about 'legitimizing' his wife to anybody? He jokes about the tape every 4th track lol he don't give a damn
  • sunlord
    sunlord Members Posts: 515 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    HafBayked wrote: »
    Will Munny wrote: »
    Damn... just about all hoes become mothers.... that ? is deep.

    while it wasnt meant to be "deep", its true.....people bring up the mother/wife aspect like it changes you as a human or changes your past......some of us here have wonderful mothers......who was bussin it open the summer of '81

    fax

    Not my bloodklatt mother my father married a ? .
  • Will Munny
    Will Munny Members Posts: 30,199 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Sometimes I wonder if the girl I’m dating now found out bout some of the super weird and depraved things I’ve done would make her want to break up with me. I got extremely uncomfortable when she asked me when the last time I had sex before we started dating.
  • Madame_CJSkywalker
    Madame_CJSkywalker Members Posts: 940 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017
    Options
    sunlord wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    LordZuko wrote: »
    Cain wrote: »
    Question for the fellas ........Would you ? with a chick that had the same body count as you?

    No. Not even half my body count.

    OK this is where I draw the line. You just insecure then if you can ? all you want before yall met but she can't?

    ? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.

    So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?

    No men are not supposed to be ? a whole bunch of women..... it's wrong when we do it but it is much less damaging to ourselves and our families reputation therefore it's more acceptable because a guy ? a lot of girls is not ruining himself because women will still want him.

    but any girl that lets you ? her outside of marriage is of lower standings and does not value herself as much as she should. SHE does not understand that ? has value and that it's the responsibility of a women to protect their ? and not let men just use it. MOST MEN don't want to marry ? .

    You still risking std's and pregnancy so yeah you're taking just as big of a risk. ? run around trying to ? every ? that walks by then complain that women can't be trusted and about them having kids by multiple ? . ? ain't even holding themselves to the standards they set for others then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you go on rants about what you do and don't want and what is and isn't acceptable

    No you are not taking as big of a risk because to begin with women catch std's easier than men do and we cannot be pregnant...... and I CONDEMED men who ? ? ? around. I had a whole argument in the mgtow thread about ? with no sexual constraints and how not having any constraints is a bad thing.

    YOU FEMINIST MALEs ARE DEVOID of reading comprehension and proper thinking ability

    But you can still be at risk for creating a child

    SO WHAT???? if you did not marry the girl you can always deny it and since she runs ? trains it's probably not yours anyway. YOU need to understand that the possibility of a man just denying his offspring is one of the principle reasons why traditionally women were taught to value their Chasity and wait until marriage.

    Now we have dna tests but men still deny their kids or if they are forced to pay CS they still don't properly father their sons......... and that is part of the reason why traditionalism is better

    its 2017

    ppl like sex

    we have condoms, free std testing

    date, ? , marry who you please...just be safe and honest with ppl

    just because a woman has had multiple partners doesn't mean she is going to mess around on you any more then someone with less partners. a woman with less partners may be more inclined to see what the next ? can do. a woman who subscribes to the belief or grows up in a world that believes sexual activity or wanting to pursue sexual pleasure is inherently linked to immorality, character is more inclined to lie to save face or maybe too ashamed to be seen at the clinic

    all this really is is just another way to shame and police ppl, particularly women

    and yes the double standard exists because it serves that agenda... if women weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality, it would be just as easy for a man to get sex as it would for a woman

    The year is irrelevant.... history is the best indicator of future action. A woman with less partners may also cheat it would be a surprise and heartbreaking however I would be a ? fool to knowingly get with a ? , bed jumping ? . Wanting to seek sexual pleasure outside of marriage is amoral. Period. YES, ? should be shamed BECAUSE shame is the fuel of social constraints. IF WOMEN weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality society would collapse. The more chaste women are the stronger the society the more sexually liberal the weaker the society. History is littered with examples of this

    EASY SEX IS BAD SEX. Anything you don't have to work for is worthless or worth less..... feminist have devalued female sexuality and in doing so you have made women devalue their very own bodies. SO men almost lost all respect for the female.

    I DON'T DISLIKE YOU but you represent an ideology and perspective I DEEPLY despise. You ? are turning young women into ? of Babylon and we are all suffering because of it

    i say this not to promote promiscuity

    but sex is not a gift or some object someone can earn possession of...treating it as such is really what is apart of the problem........its an act or action to be enjoyed by both its participants ideally

    i say its 2017 to also note nowadays sex, dating has become commercialized...every commercial, music video, movie is glorifying sex or tryna sell you the promise of sex and/or romantic relationship

    because ppl know ppl really like and long for sex... its natural....and they are willing to pay for it...ppl need money to live...etc...etc

    expecting women, or anyone, not to exploit human nature for monetary gain is unrealistic...expecting women to deny a natural impulse and remain celibate or rather virgins until marriage in this environment is unrealistic ...especially when they see their males counterparts running around doing whatever, chasing after the girls who are down for whatever

    and like I said all this "thot this", "? that" talk only leads to ppl not being honest with themselves and others....it leads to women being dehumanized because amoral/immoral ppl are thought of as lesser

    you can't expect chastity and honesty from ppl, but then give them reasons to be dishonest and unchaste
  • CapitalB
    CapitalB Members Posts: 24,556 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    <—- jus came for the 700th post
  • Busta Carmichael
    Busta Carmichael Members, Moderators Posts: 13,161 Regulator
    Options
    Westie wrote: »
    LPast wrote: »
    That's all y'all got?

    Would you be ok with your wife and the mother of your children posting nudes all day on the internet?

    Isn't this thread topic about a girl whose sex tape got leaked and her boyfriend? Why are you all over the place? you're trying to cover a vast array of Hoes. Stick to the hoe at hand.

    My ? ..... he asked me about kim kardashian.

    I answered
  • okaay
    okaay Members Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    ^my boy you sound mad hurt plz calmate

    I smashed a butch with my mans. She requested it
    Didn't touch dude at all


    I don’t get it? Is he saying, LOL, he had a threesome with two ? ! Lol, you and yo ? hit a butch that look like a ? lololol... desperate!

  • sunlord
    sunlord Members Posts: 515 ✭✭✭✭
    Options
    sunlord wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    blackrain wrote: »
    sunlord wrote: »
    LordZuko wrote: »
    Cain wrote: »
    Question for the fellas ........Would you ? with a chick that had the same body count as you?

    No. Not even half my body count.

    OK this is where I draw the line. You just insecure then if you can ? all you want before yall met but she can't?

    ? men and women are not equal therefore what is acceptable behavior for men should not be acceptable behavior for women.

    So if ? is supposed to ? a bunch of women, but women ain't supposed to be ? that much then who you ? ? ?

    No men are not supposed to be ? a whole bunch of women..... it's wrong when we do it but it is much less damaging to ourselves and our families reputation therefore it's more acceptable because a guy ? a lot of girls is not ruining himself because women will still want him.

    but any girl that lets you ? her outside of marriage is of lower standings and does not value herself as much as she should. SHE does not understand that ? has value and that it's the responsibility of a women to protect their ? and not let men just use it. MOST MEN don't want to marry ? .

    You still risking std's and pregnancy so yeah you're taking just as big of a risk. ? run around trying to ? every ? that walks by then complain that women can't be trusted and about them having kids by multiple ? . ? ain't even holding themselves to the standards they set for others then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you go on rants about what you do and don't want and what is and isn't acceptable

    No you are not taking as big of a risk because to begin with women catch std's easier than men do and we cannot be pregnant...... and I CONDEMED men who ? ? ? around. I had a whole argument in the mgtow thread about ? with no sexual constraints and how not having any constraints is a bad thing.

    YOU FEMINIST MALEs ARE DEVOID of reading comprehension and proper thinking ability

    But you can still be at risk for creating a child

    SO WHAT???? if you did not marry the girl you can always deny it and since she runs ? trains it's probably not yours anyway. YOU need to understand that the possibility of a man just denying his offspring is one of the principle reasons why traditionally women were taught to value their Chasity and wait until marriage.

    Now we have dna tests but men still deny their kids or if they are forced to pay CS they still don't properly father their sons......... and that is part of the reason why traditionalism is better

    its 2017

    ppl like sex

    we have condoms, free std testing

    date, ? , marry who you please...just be safe and honest with ppl

    just because a woman has had multiple partners doesn't mean she is going to mess around on you any more then someone with less partners. a woman with less partners may be more inclined to see what the next ? can do. a woman who subscribes to the belief or grows up in a world that believes sexual activity or wanting to pursue sexual pleasure is inherently linked to immorality, character is more inclined to lie to save face or maybe too ashamed to be seen at the clinic

    all this really is is just another way to shame and police ppl, particularly women

    and yes the double standard exists because it serves that agenda... if women weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality, it would be just as easy for a man to get sex as it would for a woman

    The year is irrelevant.... history is the best indicator of future action. A woman with less partners may also cheat it would be a surprise and heartbreaking however I would be a ? fool to knowingly get with a ? , bed jumping ? . Wanting to seek sexual pleasure outside of marriage is amoral. Period. YES, ? should be shamed BECAUSE shame is the fuel of social constraints. IF WOMEN weren't discouraged from openly exploring their sexuality society would collapse. The more chaste women are the stronger the society the more sexually liberal the weaker the society. History is littered with examples of this

    EASY SEX IS BAD SEX. Anything you don't have to work for is worthless or worth less..... feminist have devalued female sexuality and in doing so you have made women devalue their very own bodies. SO men almost lost all respect for the female.

    I DON'T DISLIKE YOU but you represent an ideology and perspective I DEEPLY despise. You ? are turning young women into ? of Babylon and we are all suffering because of it

    i say this not to promote promiscuity

    but sex is not a gift or some object someone can earn possession of...treating it as such is really what is apart of the problem........its an act or action to be enjoyed by both its participants ideally

    i say its 2017 to also note nowadays sex, dating has become commercialized...every commercial, music video, movie is glorifying sex or tryna sell you the promise of sex and/or romantic relationship

    because ppl know ppl really like and long for sex... its natural....and they are willing to pay for it...ppl need money to live...etc...etc

    expecting women, or anyone, not to exploit human nature for monetary gain is unrealistic...expecting women to deny a natural impulse and remain celibate or rather virgins until marriage in this environment is unrealistic ...especially when they see their males counterparts running around doing whatever, chasing after the girls who are down for whatever

    and like I said all this "thot this", "? that" talk only leads to ppl not being honest with themselves and others....it leads to women being dehumanized because amoral/immoral ppl are thought of as lesser

    you can't expect chastity and honesty from ppl, but then give them reasons to be dishonest and unchaste

    You are promoting whoredom and amoral behavior. Sex has become commercialized exactly because women like you have supported sexual depravity.... generations ago there wasn't this acceptance of promiscuity but you speak as if being a ? is natural.... it's not and even if it was people have always had the good sense to put up social constraints against it.

    You forget there was a time relatively recently when most women were virgins before they got married or had sex. Therefore my position is totally realistic and if the social environment is not conducive to my position it means the environment needs changing.

    And you are wrong every male of every species has to earn the right to pass his genes on. Humans are no different. Men objectify women that's how we are wired so women can choose either be objectified into something positive or something negative